Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYes - media will call Clinton"presumptive nominee" before CA - not because of Superdelegates but bec
As it should be. Let it be. The Force is with Her. #SheswithUs
Benchmark Politics ?@benchmarkpol May 25
Yes - media will call Clinton"presumptive nominee" before CA - not because of Superdelegates but because she'll clinch pledged del lead.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
17 replies, 790 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes - media will call Clinton"presumptive nominee" before CA - not because of Superdelegates but bec (Original Post)
riversedge
May 2016
OP
Yeah, screw the voters. All that matters is the coronation; let's get on with it.
lagomorph777
May 2016
#7
Sorry - mixed you up with a poster who said "media will call Clinton 'presumptive nominee'"
lagomorph777
May 2016
#13
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)1. they might call her "defendant" before California too. nt
Response to Jack Bone (Reply #1)
NowSam This message was self-deleted by its author.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)3. 19 days and counting nt
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)6. Welcome back!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)11. thank you
riversedge
(70,239 posts)5. Hard to tell Sanders fans from RW fans so many times.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)4. ...just because...
Just because, you know... this...
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)7. Yeah, screw the voters. All that matters is the coronation; let's get on with it.
And pay no attention to that man behind the subpoena.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)8. Oh, you mean that 3 million or so more voters than what have voted for Bernie?
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)9. I mean the 50 million or so who have yet to vote.
Whom you say you want to ignore.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)10. Nobody is ignoring the states to have yet to vote. the primaries go on.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)13. Sorry - mixed you up with a poster who said "media will call Clinton 'presumptive nominee'"
"as it should be"
mythology
(9,527 posts)15. There are most certainly not 50 million people left to vote
There may be 50 million in the remaining states/territories but nobody things anywhere near that many will vote in the primaries/caucuses remaining.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)17. OK - how many voters is it OK to dismiss?
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)12. I was gonna guess it was because they're a bunch of nincompoops.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)14. She will NOT clinch the pledged delegate majority until CA.
She'll only have to wait a couple more hours for it to be an accurate call.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)16. Presume all you want, it's still not a clinch.