How? How can he stop her from getting 78 delegates? How? This is pure fantasy.

I can bet on double zero ten times in a row when playing roulette and win every time.

It's theoretically possible.

Does that mean it could happen in actuality? No.

Can Bernie win in actuality? No.

But if you prefer to operate on practical impossibilities... then O'Malley can win the nomination.

She needs 78 delegates from June 7......
The SECOND she has them she is the presumptive nominee no matter if Bernie wins or not. He'd need to beat her with nearly 100 percent of all delegates and supers to steal the nom. Time to move on, it's ovah.

No, he was not.

Besides, Hillary will have the nomination sewn up when the polls close in NJ well before they close in CA. CA would just be icing on the cake. Toss in DC and PR and Bernie will be only a dot in her rearview mirror.

also they are using the superdelegates added to the count, which they are not supposed to.

Neither will get it.

Where is the rulebook and where does it say what one is "supposed" to do in these cases?

It may come as a shock to some, but no delegates vote before the convention. And when they vote, the super delegates get just as much say as the rest of the delegates.

This fabricated system where super delegates shouldn't be counted is pure fantasy. I wonder if the people parroting it realize that the super delegates will be at the convention and will be voting on the first ballot?

as much as I dislike her, she was correct when she told media to cut that shit up

Here you go

<iframe width="630" height="354" src="

Almost as scary as the FBI.

How much more "awkward" would it be for Clinton than it was for Obama 8 years ago?

This place is a fantasyland.

about as informational as your post.

Not Sanders country to say the least. Sorry.

They ended at the same time. This one started a week earlier.

Unless you think that Sanders is heavily winning African Americans and Asians, but losing among whites and Latinos?

Not happening.

There aren't enough Asian Americans and other assorted demographics to overcome being behind in the largest groups. Those numbers don't add up at all.

LOL!

Here's an opposing point of view:

http://abc7.com/politics/poll-clinton-poised-to-defeat-sanders-in-california-primary/1351808/

552.

Outlier poll with a dash of mathematical "impossibilities" thrown into the mix.

it becomes another NY or Az type thing where people are disenfranchised and/or thrown off of the voter rolls.

Show our Secretary of State Debra Bowen your proof of voter disenfranchisement in the Golden State where it concerns Bernie Sanders. She'd sure appreciate seeing the proof of what you say.

BernieMath(tm)

19 pct - 69 pct down 50 pct
25 pct swing between two candidates which leaves us with...
44 pct - 44 pct tied and made up 50 pct deficit.

When you use flawed math to insult another Democractic party presidential candidate's 'math' you can easily wind up making yourself not only look more like a candidate's reality blinded worshiper, instead of supporter , but an ignorant to boot.

Just ask the question without the BernieMath crap. You'll look less like a fool if you happen to have made a simple math mistake and it's better for party unity after the primaries are over.

That's disingenuous.

290 White, 134 Latino, 125 Other, 549 Total

Whites: 47/41 Hillary +6
Latinos: 52/43 Hillary +9

"Other" would have to be heavily Sanders to get to 46/44 overall, at least 60/40 or higher. The poll doesn't provide a breakdown, but there's no way Sanders is beating Clinton 60/40 with African Americans and Asians, who make up most of California's non-white/non-Latino 20%.

The crosstabs also don't match up. Household income, for example, matches, but the totals for college/noncollege show Hillary +5. Errors like this exist in many of the totals. They vary from the +2 indicated in the total to +7 or higher.

538 is basically treating it as an outlier, giving it less than 20% the weighting of the SurveyUSA poll from the same timeframe, which shows Hillary up 57/39.

Link to poll data: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/other/Crosstabs_LikelyVoters0516.pdf

poll workers are being trained wrong and told to give NPP provisional ballots which is WRONG