Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:06 PM May 2016

Josh Marshall at TPM: Ok, Enough. Just Pick Warren.

Excerpts:

Warren is off-the-cuff, free-wheeling and direct in all the ways Clinton is cautious and rehearsed. But it is a reinforcing rather than an invidious contrast and likely helps bring to the surface Hillary's progressive background that has been buried by decades at the pinnacle of Democratic party politics and years as the punching bag of the left of the party which feels excluded by the seemingly endless Clinton ascendency.

It may sound crazy to attach so much to her recent Twitter contretemps with Donald Trump. But the tone, rhythm and style are exactly what the Democrats need to knock Trump down and bring out his toxic mix of personal insecurity and emotional instability. It's not over-earnest or off-key or droning (traditional Democratic tonalities - let's be honest). She's mocking, substantive and constantly on target.
Indeed, Trump's responses to Warren, his attacks on her, make it clear to me he'll have a hard time handling her.

My one concern, though I wouldn't say it is a major one, is what I talked about almost a year ago, which is the fact that he moves so quickly, is so protean that he can just rapidly get in the spokes of a conventional campaign. And any Hillary Clinton campaign is highly, highly conventional. Even though Warren is so different from Trump's mix of hatred, bombast and lurking violence, I think Warren can match Trump on this ability to cut free from the media vectors and planning supply lines of the modern presidential campaign and strike hard and fast in real time. That's a big deal.


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/enough-just-pick-warren
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Josh Marshall at TPM: Ok, Enough. Just Pick Warren. (Original Post) kstewart33 May 2016 OP
Maybe because she said, NO. bahrbearian May 2016 #1
Not yet, she hasn't. kstewart33 May 2016 #2
Ok. What do we do with Hillary? leveymg May 2016 #3
Hah! Because he doesn't hate Clinton? You kill me. randome May 2016 #4
Draft Liz. Dump Hill. You'll hear more and more of that. leveymg May 2016 #6
Fuck that. We have Bernie Sanders. Schema Thing May 2016 #5
They won't let that happen. Unfortunately. leveymg May 2016 #7

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
2. Not yet, she hasn't.
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:11 PM
May 2016

Earlier this year, she simply said that she would not endorse anyone for now.

And she's recently making all the moves of a VP wannabe.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. Ok. What do we do with Hillary?
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:11 PM
May 2016

For a second there, I thought Josh had a sudden inspired thought. But, I was wrong.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
4. Hah! Because he doesn't hate Clinton? You kill me.
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:16 PM
May 2016

What he says in the article makes perfect sense. We would suffer a short-term loss of a Senate seat -6 months- but it would probably be worth it.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
6. Draft Liz. Dump Hill. You'll hear more and more of that.
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:26 PM
May 2016

Stick your fingers in your ears, if you want, but that's the way the wind blows.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
7. They won't let that happen. Unfortunately.
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:28 PM
May 2016

The whole thing is a catastrophe, but it was Hillary who forced that outcome. Maybe the Democratic Party will recover. Maybe it won't.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Josh Marshall at TPM: Ok,...