Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Defends Email Use, Discusses Potential Sanders/Trump Debate (Original Post) NWCorona May 2016 OP
BIGER pciture, she is pushing back on all networks and at least Blitzer pushed her back hard nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #1
Watch how she tries to mitigate the issue by bringing up the threat of trump NWCorona May 2016 #2
She has, and here as well, we have heard the Trump line nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #3
Yup! She needs trump NWCorona May 2016 #4
Well when Trump says that he wants to run against her nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6
Lol! So true! NWCorona May 2016 #11
Hill did a fine job. kstewart33 May 2016 #5
The word Exclusively applies to her nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #8
I have read the 'exclusive' report. kstewart33 May 2016 #9
So you know that report used that word about her nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #10
Since you know of them, who are these future club fed residents? kstewart33 May 2016 #14
For starters my husand nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #15
I can't take you seriously now. NWCorona May 2016 #13
She should change her campaign slogan Peachhead22 May 2016 #7
There is one question all media skirts that would make headlines. gordianot May 2016 #12
It was asked but it seems lightyears ago. NWCorona May 2016 #16
Jorge Ramos has nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #17
That is what I would expect a non answer. gordianot May 2016 #18
Wolf read from the report nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #19
She has to be shook, even with no indictment it stings. gordianot May 2016 #21
Good interview, good to hear her plans for when primary is over. Thanks for posting her interview. Sunlei May 2016 #20
No problem! my views are known but she did do a good job. NWCorona May 2016 #22
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
1. BIGER pciture, she is pushing back on all networks and at least Blitzer pushed her back hard
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

now I will watch the video.

Edit, did not push as hard as CNN

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
5. Hill did a fine job.
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:02 PM
May 2016

Making the critical point that she broke no rules during her SOS tenure, but later the rules were changed.

If Colin Powell sent State Department emails on his laptop, why are the guns aimed at Clinton?

Obvious question, obvious answer.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
8. The word Exclusively applies to her
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:03 PM
May 2016

you might want to read the report.

We are hosting it, so no hard time finding it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. So you know that report used that word about her
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:07 PM
May 2016

and how that was a serious violation. Good.

This is not a mole hill. I know plenty of folks who would be doing decades at club fed for this.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
14. Since you know of them, who are these future club fed residents?
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:11 PM
May 2016

Can you give us five or six names among the plenty? People who are actually going to do jail time for this?

It would be helpful. Not being snarky here, it would be.

But if you can't/don't, this is simply another example of exaggerating = making a mountain out of a molehill.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
15. For starters my husand
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:14 PM
May 2016

who held a clearance. Then there are a few US Military vets who held above TS who would have years in club fed for doing this.

And this is why this is no joke. except for partisans. The consequences are extremely serious And that report was not a nothing burger. It contradicted major points of her story. like the server was not above board, and they did not report breaches or attempted breaches, as regulations require.

I doubt you read the report.

gordianot

(15,238 posts)
12. There is one question all media skirts that would make headlines.
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:09 PM
May 2016

If you are indicted or is suggested possible violation of the law will you withdraw your name from the Primary?

I have a twenty dollar bet on the table for lunch that Hillary would say "no" (with a Hillary supporter). This person still thinks this will all go away but still takes the bet that she has enough integrity to say "Yes" withdraw.

Surely some game member of the media will ask that question.

gordianot

(15,238 posts)
18. That is what I would expect a non answer.
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:34 PM
May 2016

The bet is specific "No will not resign" for me. For my friend "Yes will resign". Hillary's prepared virtual denial of the report has me excited. One of those reporters could have asked that question today and even the non answer would have created a frenzy.

I want a free lunch!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
19. Wolf read from the report
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:35 PM
May 2016

quoted word for word, and hers was still the same story. Like she is not listening

gordianot

(15,238 posts)
21. She has to be shook, even with no indictment it stings.
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:44 PM
May 2016

At least today they are not issuing positive spin just the same old denial. It's coming and for me it is sport.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Defends E...