Bill and Hillary.

Was Trump running for president when they attended his wedding?

If you are photographed with someone...anyone...it means you are the best of friends, soul mates, bro's, kindred spirits, blood sisters and blood brothers, the same etc. it's an ancient, fringe left custom.

Imagine having to account for the actions of every person they met.

Majority will back HRC.

.


He's just a coward who tried several times to weasel out, before coming up with a lame excuse.


So much for Trump's concerns over women's centers, and their funding.

.

...misdirection, the rest of the article reveals itself as more hot air masquerading as 'news'.

Y-you guys really do just think this whole media blitz thing still works, don't you? LOL.

She will clinch early June 7.

to debate the person who came in second place in the other party.

Talk about gaming the system. He set up a mean, divisive narrative where there is no reason anyone could possibly reject his candidacy or policy ideas, other than they are corrupt or stupid.

PP and HRC endorsed Clinton and they were The Establishment. Southern voters, particularly southern blacks reject his candidacy and it is because they are part of the Confederacy. Any primary he loses is because it is rigged or somehow unfair. And then the non-predictive polls he pimps to justify his poor sportsmanship is just pitiful. The superD flip flops are astounding to watch, too. The "unchanging" Bernie Sanders evolved pretty damn fast on that one. Just like he evolved on the being a Democrat thing. He changes pretty quickly when it suits his political agenda and then throws ANYONE under the bus who doesn't agree with his views 100%.

And many of his supporters question NOTHING. Talk about lack of self-awareness.

Wait, is that the thing they used to bore people with in meetings and lectures before there were really boring PowerPoint presentations? You must be pretty old to remember those so well. I only have vague recollections. Why is your post insulting? It must be completely off base since I have no idea what you are going on about.

Whatever. Reliance on ad homs indicate a weak position.

She promised a debate she reneged on. This is no game Bernie is playing. This is a revolution he is fomenting and it is gonna happen. Even if Bernie is never president, he is changing, forever, the politics of this country. I stand with him. If it means taking down the establishment Dems because they won't get on board, so be it.

Guess who uses his words to also trash HRC.

"I have a lifetime of experience, John McCain has a lifetime of experience, and Barack Obama has a speech."

Good Lord, have you been paying attention to what the Republicans have said about Donald Trump? This is going to be your excuse?

or whether it was a quirk of this particular election.

Don't try to make his a scapegoat for your poor choice for a candidate to defeat Trump.

He has not just gone after Hillary, which is fair up to a point because she's his opponent, but has gone after the party itself. This delusion that the same nominating process that was in place when Obama was nominated is rigged against him is nonsense.

He has throughout shown a disdain for the party, a party that he has criticized for decades. by his own admission, his motive for joining the party was self serving. He did so to gain media attention.

In my book, he's a dogmatic politician who can't accept that some people simply don't want him to be the nominee and voted for his opponent.

candidates like Clinton-Sachs. Why would you think the corporations like Goldman-Sachs would help the working class and the poor? They won't. Not sure Clinton fans care as long as they get their Aristocracy.

Viva Bernie!

that is beholden to them.

Those that can't recognize that the Wealthy control our government are living in a bubble of denial.

and neither can you.

can fool conservatives all of the time. Looks like blind adulation.

Looks like you're trying to live up to your screen name.

Keep repeating an unsubstantiated accusation in an attempt to turn rhetoric into truth. Apparently you don't know the difference between the two.

Why do you think Clinton and Wall Street are fighting so hard against Sanders? It sure isn't because they want to help the poor more that he does. Clinton's positions on almost everything align with those that gave her and Bill well over one hundred million dollars. But her fans think that she will take $600,000 from Goldman-Sachs and then, when president raise taxes on the banksters. Really? How sadly naive.

The oligarchy backs Clinton, both Mr. Goldman-Sachs and the Koch Bros say so. The neocons back Clinton as Richard Perle will tell you.

How can Democrats turn their backs on the working class and the poor and support the Wealthy that run our government?

All you do is repeat the same trite and inane phrases about oligarchy and neocons, and attack other Democrats who don't share your binary vision of reality. Your schtick is really getting old.

And that aint all the Republicon's fault.

2.5 million American children are homeless. 16 million living in poverty with another 16 million living in low income homes and we have the worst infant mortality rate among modern nations. More and more are becoming unemployed or underemployed and our Prisons For Profits are booming.

What is getting old is that everything is wonderful and let's keep going down this path were we are losing homes, jobs and retirements. We still have a poor health care system. But the Clinton fans don't care as long as Goldman-Sachs gets higher and higher profits.

We no longer live in a democracy.

There are thousands of corporations in this country, some worse than others, but the Left seems to be focused on one in particular.

of corporate denial. If Clinton becomes president, then Goldman-Sachs will run our country. How many more TARP can we survive? Why not again? In a matter of a few days approx $12,000,000,000,000 was transferred from the pockets of the 99% to the 1% and nothing was done about it. The greatest heist in history and there is nothing in place to stop it from happening again. The working class and poor will suffer for it forever. But to some, supporting the Rich and Powerful is more important than helping the poor. Goldman-Sachs would love to get their hands on Social Security. But again the Clinton fans aren't worried.

More guilt-tripping.

Here's the thing. When a campaign goes out and subtly or not-so-subtly, through Hillary Clinton or her surrogates, lies that Bernie Sanders wants to "dismantle Medicare", take health care away from "millions and millions and millions of people", that his Civil Rights record is fictitious and Hillary was always there, that he's a "lockstep vote for the NRA" with his D- voting record, that his supporters are racist, and that his supporters are sexist (nice sexism shot at the end there), and that to boot his female supporters have a special place in Hell earned by not supporting Hillary Clinton (which, after laughing and applauding, the candidate herself doesn't back off after a thoughtful and considered bout of reflection) you don't get to complain at the end of the process that you have totally alienated a large swath of voters - voters who the campaign knows are largely Independents and young people who, unlike 2008, have little if any institutional attachment to the Democratic Party like Hillary Clinton's supporters did in 2008. You seem a little confused about who has conducted the scorched earth strategy here.

And when the head of the DNC schedules ~1/4 the number of debates as in 2008, to the objection of all the other candidates at the outset, and goes on live television and lies about imaginary chair-throwing incidents in Nevada that never took place and resulted in no pictures, video, injuries or arrests in a roomful of officers, yeah, there's a problem there. A positive way forward would begin by acknowledging it. An unproductive way is saying "get in line."

Hillary Clinton did these things, Hillary Clinton will decide what to do from here.

rather actually running to win.

Even at that no 3am phone call ads, "not a Muslim as far as I know", no declaration that the TeaPubliKLAN and his self are ready to be Commander in Chief but Clinton isn't, or invoking Bobby Kennedy stuff.

Then he goes from being the third wheel to a sore loser.

He has no interest in helping Clinton beat Trump. His wounded pride won't allow it.

I hope that we are wrong and that he enthusiastically works hard to help Democrats defeat the Republicans. That's what Hillary did in 2008.

When the writing is on the wall, anyone who really cares about what they espouse would take a good look at how to best further their cause. Trump is not that way.

Sorry but Bob-Bye to you

Have you checked under your bed for communists today?

It is "un-American" to call other Americans "un-American".

Particularly when nothing that Trump says can be taken seriously. he switches positions within hours, not days. Trump is just a successful con man, nothing more.