The FBI is currently investigating whether or not Hillary Clinton’s email practices constituted a threat to national security. It’s not clear how much Lehel’s alleged hack revealed about the vulnerability of the former secretary of state’s communications.

https://www.rt.com/usa/344131-guccifer-clinton-hacker-guilty/

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)

8. The logs from the Fortinet security device that they used show no intrusions

Reply to Meteor Man (Reply #5)

Sat May 28, 2016, 05:21 PM

May 2016

Meteor Man

(385 posts)

9. Nice link

Reply to BlueStateLib (Reply #8)

Sat May 28, 2016, 05:24 PM

May 2016

Did you get that information from one of Hillary's emails?

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)

10. Security Logs of Hillary Clinton’s Email Server Are Said to Show No Evidence of Hacking

Reply to Meteor Man (Reply #9)

Sat May 28, 2016, 05:29 PM

May 2016

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/us/politics/security-logs-of-hillary-clintons-email-server-are-said-to-show-no-evidence-of-hacking.html

Meteor Man

(385 posts)

11. That was the story in March

Reply to BlueStateLib (Reply #10)

Sat May 28, 2016, 05:35 PM

May 2016

This was the conclusion of the March NYTimes story:

hey are not definitive, and forensic experts can sometimes spot sophisticated hacking that is not apparent in the logs, but computer security experts view logs as key documents when detecting hackers.

msongs

(67,420 posts)

6. exactly what law = no response lol nt

Reply to riversedge (Reply #2)

Sat May 28, 2016, 05:15 PM

May 2016

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)

4. Two whole minutes for replies.

Reply to XemaSab (Original post)

Sat May 28, 2016, 05:06 PM

May 2016

Most of us peasants have a Yahoo or Google for things like weddings and family and social events. Unless they are operatives no one would care. Heck, you can get multiple accounts.What one needs Super Duper Privacy for tells the story

It's just one big Duh

Response to XemaSab (Original post)

silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.

Reply to this discussion