Seems to be one they keep pounding lately anyway.

Just to correct you: She wins when she is nominate on the floor of the convention 2 months from now. SHE HAS NOT WON ANYTHING YET!

Rules".

The real world is going to stick with the old rules, which on June 7th will have President Obama, Senator Warren, the media, and 99 percent of national and downticket Democrats on Hillary's side against sore-loser crybaby Bernie Sanders. He should have conceded MONTHs ago, when he first fell behind by so many hundreds of delegates that nomination became impossible. That's what other Democratic also-rans have done for decades.

I'm not a Hillary supporter at all. I really can't stand Third Way policies at all.

by them.

the people have spoken. No gymnastics required.

A way the system is rigged. Also the constant pressing that Hillary is inevitable. She can't win fairly.

Speaking of mental gymnastics, how to explain Clinton losing to Obama when Clinton has the magic powers to rig the system?

Clinton won fairly except in the bitter minds of some Sanders supporters who can't come to grips with it yet.

It takes years and a lot of work to get name recognition.

He didn't.

I don't attack either candidate because I find them both acceptable and there's more than enough hate in the world.

All we need to know

Winning is the only thing.

6. Libya
7. Honduras
8. Iraq vote
9. Election fraud doesn't exist
10. Voter suppression - it's just filthy independents, not people willing to engage with democrats and become one.
11. Horrible trade deals
12. Fracking

Why has BS been such a poor candidate? And why is he losing by so much?

And pretending that all his problems are because the DNC is rigged against him and that so many of his supporters were disenfranchised (and that Secretary Clinton's were not) ... is a cop out. That isn't why he is coming in second place.

but that doesn't make it so. Massive cheating via DWS is a completely legit answer for why the primaries have turned out as they have.

You've still addressed nothing. Being dismissive doesn't change the facts.

and that's a fact. What happened is politics and the rules as they exist. BS knew what they were (or he should have) when he signed up for this. And now a year later, you can't come back and say how unfair those rules were and that they cost him the nomination ... because they didn't. BS cost himself the nomination, BS handicapped himself right from the beginning.

Nothing to see here

The Clinton Foundation exists to do charity work.


Cher

And it was never used for weapon deals for people who donated to it, and if that did happen pure Coincidence!

Saudi Arabia did not donate to the foundation while Hillary was secretary of state. They donated before but then it was not known she was going to be secretary. No quid pro quo was possible

Arms deals are extremely complex and go through many entities. They can take as long as seven years. Most of what happens comes under the Pentagon. Its not as if somebody could take a bribe and just approve one.

The Saudi Arms deal was a major initiative of the entire administration. It started under Bush but was expanded under Obama for two major reasons. First, it was expected to produce 50,000 or 75,000 jobs. This was at a time when the 2008 crash left the country with high unemployment and the arms jobs were among the few that could be produced. The administration also wanted to build a barrier to Iran. The Saudi deal was the largest arms sale ever. It was inconceivable that Hillary wouldn't approve it. Tying the approval to donations to a foundation the Clintons got no direct compensation from is far fetched. Its like a whole city being flooded by a hurricane and somebody saying the flood was caused by someone letting their faucet drip.

The falsehood that Hillary's approval was because of Saudi donations to the foundation comes from an International Business Times article that is full of holes.

Who paid for her speeches when she was a "private citizen" !! Forgot to add that too!

Thanks! 9/10 of Mental gymnastics landing!

change of subject. 10

Truly huge.

Then again some get so full of themselves they don't even notice it till it's too late

Bernie is pretty darned old, and it sometimes leads to warped visions of reality and to falling back on old slogans without any comprehension of details.

My mom is 87, i see her everyday and help her out with whatever she needs. Though some of her capacities have diminished you would still have a hard time finding somebody that has a grudge or something else to hold against her. The solid fact she has been as honest as she could be all her life makes it easy for her.

Trust is not an easy thing to find but is easy to see

It's not what you forget when you get old, it's just the things that you thought you knew.

He will recreate the 90's just wait everyone will love it

the 1890s and you will love that.

To get everyone back together again. Many who are voting for him need to see who really is shipping their jobs overseas they don't seem to understand. Trump will make them feel better.

15. She is more progressive than Bernie

16. She is more electable vs Trump than Bernie is

17. Despite the scandalous way she ran the State Dept., and the resulting investigations she is going to be mired in for endless months, she will STILL be "more effective" than Bernie could be.

18. Democrats who are critical of her are secretly right wing or sexist or both.

19. Her Haiti minimum wage hike suppression never happened.

Sanders

1. Sierra Blanca
2. Jane's university loan.

Cartwheel away.

I give that somersault a 1 out of 10.

Talk about Pretzel Logic!

Holy crap, you have to be made of rubber to bend that many directions at the same time.

...from stances she's taken to statements she's made in her own words are part of a RW conspiracy.

Bernie would never give over a milllion to someone to buy influence, even if that person is Chuck Todd's wife.


Wall Streeters and bankers are bad. Banks must be broken up. Banks fucked people over. No one, not even the President of Burlington College
would ever fuck over a bank. Or a college. Or the Catholic Church. Or a state development agency.

Bern would never adopt a less than progressive stance on guns just to gain entrance to the Congress.

Bern would never vote for wasteful military pork that benefits his constituents just to get reelected.

Crusty. Old. Opportunistic. Political. Hack.

7. A congressional oversight committee accused her of lying and after three years of investigation she decided not to press charges.

8. Her emails have revealed she is so adept at negotiation a Nigerian prince wired her 1.3 million without asking for any upfront costs.

9. She retroactively made one of her pantsuits top secret.

10. She's on a first name basis with the world.

Stay silly my friends!

She has the power and authority to de-classify military and other state classified information by telling employers to take off security headers and saying, "Send it to me at home!"

She can use a personal email 'cuz "other people working for State have done it."



Cher

Hillary books her rallies into small convention centers because she wants a more intimate setting to speak to her voters.


Cher

There's no quid pro quo, not even a potential conflict of interest.

Her real position is the one she stated most recently.

She dodged sniper fire in Bosnia.

Quoting her verbatim is a right-wing attack.

She tries to tell the truth.

She's not influenced by money.

She always remains calm and collected.

This is not her picture.

First, a factoid: "In addition to the normal Democratic supporters, Sanders does well among young white males."
From this, a strawman: "Sanders supporters are racists and sexists!" (ignore for the moment, the fact that this strawman is itself inherently a bigoted stereotype)
From that strawman: "Nothing you can do will ever get young white men to stop voting for Republicans".

... which is inherently contradicted by the factoid itself.

At least when I can't find my phone, I can dial the number.

Congrats!

but the mental gymnastics required to believe Bernie has a chance at the nomination are truly olympic-worthy.

Are you also worried about her Twitter too?

Before she announced: Citizens United is horrible.
After: Banks being her largest donors over her career and her getting more money from banks this election cycle than all the other candidates combined, her getting filthy rich thanks to large corporations, isn't a concern. She's Hillary, and everyone else are just humans.

The Iraq War was horrible, Bush lied and people died.
She becomes the nominee, and whoopsie, she made a mistake (and continues to, with her continued to support of regime change, and hawkish foreign policy positions).

She won many primaries based on her "electability". Never mind that she was never more electable, polls horribly, does much worse than Sanders versus Trump and is not liked or trusted. Look at their silly justifications for overlooking all that when explaining why they still back her.

Then there's the justifications for all their damn lies, the Berniebros, the outright lies about what happened in Vegas, the "English only" lie. Remember when he hinted at her not being qualified? They went crazy over that fake controversy. None of them would dare to address the horrible, and often racist, things she said in 2008 when running against Obama, and certainly never touched her saying on numerous occasions that she and McCain were qualified and he wasn't (I think she she said on numerous occasions that all he had was a speech). Blatant, constant lying, intentional short term memory, and no damn shame.

It doesn't change the fact that more Democrats prefer the Democrat, and voted for her.