Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Apparently Ras was the most reliable in 2008 (Original Post) cilla4progress Nov 2012 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author RandySF Nov 2012 #1
As I'm given to understand Cirque du So-What Nov 2012 #2
Oh, that would be good news! cilla4progress Nov 2012 #4
Not true DrToast Nov 2012 #8
That's what I get Cirque du So-What Nov 2012 #11
Ras was very accurate in 2008 DrToast Nov 2012 #3
As the other posted noted this in Intrade BTW, they have the president up now. Nt helpisontheway Nov 2012 #5
Read their actual claims Progressive dog Nov 2012 #6
Links? cilla4progress Nov 2012 #9
fyi Progressive dog Nov 2012 #12
This is their 2010 poll. cilla4progress Nov 2012 #13
2008 Progressive dog Nov 2012 #14
Like to hear that! cilla4progress Nov 2012 #15
So now looking at RCP cilla4progress Nov 2012 #7
Ras has a tie in Ohio right now cilla4progress Nov 2012 #10

Response to cilla4progress (Original post)

Cirque du So-What

(25,941 posts)
2. As I'm given to understand
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 02:03 PM
Nov 2012

in 2008, (R)ASSmussen consistently showed McAnus ahead of Barack Obama...until the eve of the election, when they made a major course correction and called it for President Obama - just in time to garner the 'most reliable' title.

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
6. Read their actual claims
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

Notice that they only claim this "accuracy" on their last national poll. Maybe do more research before posting.

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
14. 2008
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 02:46 PM
Nov 2012

[link:http://www.fordham.edu/images/academics/graduate_schools/gsas/elections_and_campaign_/2008%20poll%20accuracy%20panagopoulos.pdf|
When assessing polling accuracy, there are various ways of measuring. In 2012, when you have polls that consistently are outliers, like Rasmussen--which were some of the worst polls in the 2010 cycle, it certainly defies credibility that anyone would still consider them as one of the more accurate pollsters.

cilla4progress

(24,736 posts)
15. Like to hear that!
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 03:20 PM
Nov 2012

Not sure @ sustainability of various pollsters. I don't even see PPP in the 2008, nor 2010 (I think?) pollster listings?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Apparently Ras was the mo...