Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 06:24 PM Nov 2012

Michael Smerconish: The smearing of a president: From start, unrelenting, unfair

http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20121104_The_Pulse__The_smearing_of_a_president__From_start__unrelenting__unfair.html

The Pulse: The smearing of a president: From start, unrelenting, unfair
Michael Smerconish, Inquirer Columnist
Posted: Sunday, November 4, 2012, 4:01 AM


This election has always been a referendum on Barack Obama. For some, not on matters of substance. They can't have it both ways. It's hypocritical to distribute a vicious, false narrative about him while fancying yourself a patriot and a great American. Vilify a sitting president of the United States with fiction and innuendo, and you are neither.

I objected when George W. Bush was the subject of undeserved hyperbolic criticism, but the baseless scorn heaped upon President Obama makes Bush's detractors look diplomatic. The president, the office, and our nation deserve better.

It's been unrelenting.
The day after Obama took office, Rush Limbaugh told Sean Hannity he wanted him to "fail." Later, Glenn Beck called the president a "racist" with a "deep-seated hatred of white people." Donald Trump's birtherism took hold while words like socialist were uttered with increased frequency. And a prairie fire of falsehoods spread through the Internet suggesting, among other things, that Obama is a Muslim or refused to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, paving the way for Dinesh D'Souza's fictionalized "documentary" 2016, which characterized Obama as fulfilling the anticolonial agenda of his father - a man he literally knew for just one weekend!

Among the usual memes used to undermine the president is the threat of some apocalyptic cataclysm, usually in the form of an assertion of federal power, like the seizing of guns. These predictions demand unthinking acceptance of the notion that the president, like a bizarre Manchurian candidate, is saving his nefarious agenda for a second term that might never arrive. By my count, the website Snopes.com has evaluated and debunked 103 of 124 Internet assertions about Obama.

snip//

The reality is that there is much to be admired in the president and his rise to power. Replace Kenya with Poland or Germany, and you'd have observers rightly saying that only in this country could such a career path be possible. He is a loving husband and father who, with the first lady, is ably raising two daughters in the glare of the White House. He is an intellectual heavyweight. And his personal ethics have been above reproach.

Real patriots vote for or against candidates based on substance, not smears.



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michael Smerconish: The smearing of a president: From start, unrelenting, unfair (Original Post) babylonsister Nov 2012 OP
The list goes on forever. There has NEVER been anything like this in our history and I am world wide wally Nov 2012 #1
Exactly Michael Smerconish.. and that goes for everyone who Ignores the Substance. Cha Nov 2012 #2
KICK!!! calimary Nov 2012 #3
Wow. That sums it up --in a very powerful way. Phx_Dem Nov 2012 #4
I like this article. treestar Nov 2012 #5

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)
1. The list goes on forever. There has NEVER been anything like this in our history and I am
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 06:39 PM
Nov 2012

embarrassed by it. My personal theory on how all this began goes back to when Clinton beat Bush and threw a complete monkey wrench into the neocon (or whatever you want to call them at that point in time) plan.

Bush 1 was supposed to keep the ball rolling from Reagan for two terms and this fucking upstart Governor from Arkansas upset the apple cart. Republicans attacked him relentlessly pushing it all the way to impeachment.

Then of course, we got Bush 2 with the rigged Supreme Court and their plan was back on track. But he fucked up the country so bad that he was literally thrown out by the people and there was little anyone could do about it. What they could do was attack the black Democrat who won and make his life as miserable as possible from day one at the expense of the entire country.
Now they put up their own little corporate puppet so they can get their plan back on track. Obama is in their way, so this is how they deal with it. Promote hatred, enlist the ignorant, and spend whatever is needed. Lie, cheat....... and... let's just not let them steal!

Cha

(297,304 posts)
2. Exactly Michael Smerconish.. and that goes for everyone who Ignores the Substance.
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 06:56 PM
Nov 2012
This election has always been a referendum on Barack Obama. For some, not on matters of substance. They can't have it both ways. It's hypocritical to distribute a vicious, false narrative about him while fancying yourself a patriot and a great American. Vilify a sitting president of the United States with fiction and innuendo, and you are neither.


Excellent.. "Real patriots vote for or against candidates based on substance, not smears."

Thanks babylonsistah
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Michael Smerconish: The ...