Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 02:55 PM Nov 2012

Salon.com: Ohio Republicans Sneak Risky Software Onto Voting Machines

Good for Salon and Huffington Post for picking this up. Hope they're followed by the major media.

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/ohio_republicans_sneak_risky_software_onto_voting_machines/

Last week, Bob Fitrakis and Gerry Bello at FreePress.org reported an important story concerning what they described as “uncertified ‘experimental’ software patches” being installed at the last minute on electronic vote tabulation systems in 39 Ohio counties.

The story included a copy of the contract [PDF] between Republican Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted’s office and ES&S, the nation’s largest e-voting system manufacturer, for a new, last-minute piece of software created to the custom specifications of the secretary of state. The contract itself describes the software as “High-level enhancements to ES&S’ election reporting software that extend beyond the current features and functionality of the software to facilitate a custom-developed State Election Results Reporting File.”

A subsequent story at The Free Press the following day included text said to be from a November 1 memo sent from the Ohio secretary of state’s Election Counsel Brandi Laser Seske to a number of state election officials confirming the use of the new, uncertified software on Ohio’s tabulator systems. The memo claims that “its function is to aid in the reporting of results” by converting them “into a format that can be read by the Secretary of State’s election night reporting system.”

On Friday evening, at Huffington Post, journalist Art Levine followed up with a piece that, among other things, advanced the story by breaking the news that Fitrakis and his attorney Cliff Arnebeck were filing a lawsuit for an immediate injunction against Husted and ES&S to “halt the use of secretly installed, unauthorized ‘experimental’ software in 39 counties’ tabulators.” Levine also reported that Arnebeck had referred the matter to the Cincinnati FBI for criminal investigation of what the Ohio attorney describes as “a flagrant violation of the law.”

SNIP

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Salon.com: Ohio Republicans Sneak Risky Software Onto Voting Machines (Original Post) pnwmom Nov 2012 OP
Good catch! ExVAguy Nov 2012 #1
ya would think questionseverything Nov 2012 #4
Welcome to DU, ExVAguy! n/t pnwmom Nov 2012 #8
Thank you! ExVAguy Nov 2012 #10
husted is just evil questionseverything Nov 2012 #2
I am very concerned about any new, last-minute piece of software wildeyed Nov 2012 #3
That software should be examined very carefully C_U_L8R Nov 2012 #5
So glad this story is getting picked up flamingdem Nov 2012 #6
Patches are bad news. I tested sytems for a major insurance company Lint Head Nov 2012 #7
i hope US atterney general Holder is aware of this trueblue2007 Nov 2012 #9

ExVAguy

(10 posts)
1. Good catch!
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 03:02 PM
Nov 2012

I work with servers and I can say that untested or experimental patches are very unpredictable. Ideally critical systems like voting machines should have their patch level frozen some months before the event date to certify that equipment is stable.

questionseverything

(9,660 posts)
4. ya would think
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 03:15 PM
Nov 2012

As The Free Press notes, "Government reports such as Ohio's Everest study [PDF] [the landmark analysis of the state's electronic voting systems by world class academic and corporate computer science and security experts, commissioned by Husted's Democratic predecessor Sec. of State Jennifer Brunner] document that any single change to the system could corrupt the whole voting process."

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
3. I am very concerned about any new, last-minute piece of software
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 03:14 PM
Nov 2012

created to the custom specifications of Husted. There is no way that this si good or legit.

“The reporting system and the counting system are not connected in any actual way. And the results that anybody can get at home on their computer are — they’re going to get them at the same time that I do on Election Night. So we have a very transparent system.”


Yeah, and as we remember from FL 2000, if you can make it look like your candidate won early, and get people to report it as such, it is sooooo much easier to steal it when there are questions later.

C_U_L8R

(45,021 posts)
5. That software should be examined very carefully
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 03:16 PM
Nov 2012

and if there's hanky-panky, these crooks need to go to jail.

flamingdem

(39,324 posts)
6. So glad this story is getting picked up
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 03:16 PM
Nov 2012

It's our only chance - they've done this kind of thing before and gotten away with it

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
7. Patches are bad news. I tested sytems for a major insurance company
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 03:17 PM
Nov 2012

Last edited Mon Nov 5, 2012, 04:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Untested patches and fixes have literally cost millions in recoupment man hours.
.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Salon.com: Ohio Republica...