to her foundation.

It's not like this wasn't well known when she was SoS.

Take Qatar for instance:

Hillary Clinton's State Department, decided that the Qatar govt would be allowed to purchase 14 times more military hardware and services than before she took office. This was done despite the the fact that the Qatar govt. was associating with a known financier of terrorism.

Since 2008 a businessman from Qatar who has known ties to the ruling elite of Qatar has been on a world wide black list for funding terrorism. This person provided vast amounts of weapons and cash for terrorists in Syria & Iraq.

How is it possible for then Secretary of State Clinton to not know about the world wide blacklisted terrorist financier and his ties to members of the Qatar government? How much of those arms sold to Qatar ended up supplying terrorists?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/12/01/qatars-arms-aid-found-in-terrorists-positions-in-syrias-lattakia/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/qatar/11110931/How-Qatar-is-funding-the-rise-of-Islamist-extremists.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/08/world/middleeast/qatars-support-of-extremists-alienates-allies-near-and-far.html

The Clinton foundation also received between $1 million and $5 million from the country of Qatar. Hillary Clinton sometime after that increased military sales by 14 fold over what they received previously under the Bush administration.

Did she attempt to hire him at the State Depth before hiring him through her charity?

What kind of relationship would you call that?

Most of our worlds 'movers and shakers' have a LOT of them.

I'd hire trusted friends and family first if possible, wouldn't you?

and hired him privately through her charity. It's all legal but it's obvious smoke and mirrors unless you're a die hard Hillary fan who won't admit the truth.

I think they were/are both excellent SOS.

excellent President/ VP.

I guess his VP took him down. He took money in Ohio to recount and stand tall but after that he threw the hat in. Mr. Edwards came out a few days later with his sad story. What a nightmare.

Go figure!

Action yields the best results.

I find it ironic that since Hillary left State that our foreign policy has been more doveish than when she was SoS and Hillary is given a pass on the hawkish nature from her time in the position.

Better stop both of those, otherwise you will be seen as in the tank for them.

it early on during her first term.

Conspicuous omission of our new bff

isn't this a case of acting before all the facts are in?

particular religious pervert, among many other religous perverts.

That are much more expensive, relatively speaking, than what we pay.

I had a prepaid phone I'm Egypt and my monthly bill was $500 US a month, I paid nearly double that in Qatar.

This is like Matt Sheperd, much larger scale and with an automatic weapon.

Pinning it on radical Islam isn't addressing the heart of this, it is an LGBT hate crime. Start a good quality domestic education and policy program in response to this, don't rev up the Muslim hate.

See what this feels like to many in the LGBT community: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1487297

looking to 'end' his miserable/angry/hateful life and take a very, very soft target of innocent people with him.

That makes as much sense as attacking Iraq when it was Saudi Arabians who did 911. Oops..and now she is funded by the same people that did 911 and is yelling at them for something they didn't do? The wheels are not on the road here. Hill supporters should be wondering about all of this.

In regard to Hill and her falure to follow President Obama's direction. I am referring to Sydney Blumenthol. The fact that the Clinton Foundation hired him to work with Hill when The President refused to let her work directly with Him. This all rolled into the server scandal. This is old news and I an sure you have seen it!

Can you imagine if it came out that Bernie was financed by a foreign country. Especially one with ties to 911. There would be some serious questions!

to be said.

Huge donations from Saudi and then she turns around with this. How do you explain it?

The progenitors of Wahhabi Islam have been donating to her foundation for HOW LONG? Smoke and mirrors, I don't buy it for a second.

Saudi Arabia Has Funded 20% Of Hillary's Presidential Campaign, Saudi Crown Prince Claims


The third area that demands attention is preventing radicalization and countering efforts by ISIS and other international terrorist networks to recruit in the United States and Europe. For starters, it is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations. And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path towards extremism. We also have to use all our capabilities to counter jihadist propaganda online. This is something that I spend a lot of time on at the State Department.

There is nothing wrong with that statement, as it is the whole truth - Saudi Arabia's involvement in supporting terrorism stretches from Sept 11 all the way through to ISIS - however, where there is a big, and potentially law-breaking, problem is what Jordan's official news agency, Petra News Agency, reported on Sunday citing the Saudi crown price, namely that Saudi Arabia is a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next president of the United States.

As MEE notes, the Petra News Agency published on Sunday what it described as exclusive comments from Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman which included a claim that Riyadh has provided 20 percent of the total funding to the prospective Democratic candidate's campaign.

The report was later deleted and the news agency has not responded to requests for comment from Middle East Eye. However, the deletion took place too late, as the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs managed to capture the report and has re-published the original Arabic Petra report, which quoted Prince Mohammed as having said Saudi Arabia had provided with “full enthusiasm” an undisclosed amount of money to Clinton.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/saudi-arabia-has-funded-20-hillarys-presidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims

Is she trying to make Trump look more normal?

Showing middle-right Independents that she can be "tough" on terrorism.
Her senior spokesman advocating for greater surveillance of "Islamic element" and now this aggressive lashing out at governments we give millions of dollars of weapons, much of it under the premise to fight terrorism.

Leveraging this attack to make political points seems tactless.
Our nation exports more weapons than all the top ten 1st world nation exports combined. comcombined.

It is very hard to take these comments as self-serving and opportunistic.

but has already told them behind closed doors that they shouldn't worry, it's just part of campaigning and it'll be business as usual once she's in.