Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:28 AM Jun 2016

Diplomats’ Dissent on Syria Is a Signal to Clinton -- Russia Too

Diplomats’ Dissent on Syria Is a Signal to Clinton -- Russia Too

June 17, 2016 — 3:58 PM EDT

A "dissent memo” signed by dozens of State Department officials urging U.S. airstrikes on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces is a message to their former boss Hillary Clinton -- and a warning to Assad and the Russians -- that career diplomats want President Barack Obama’s successor to take a harder line against the dictator.

The memo calls for limited U.S. airstrikes on Assad’s forces in response to the collapse of a tentative cease-fire in Syria’s five-year civil war, according to a person who has been briefed on the letter. Assad said this month that he would take back "every inch" of Syria from opposition forces. The 51 officials who signed the document argue that U.S. military action would force Assad and his ally, Russia, to make concessions in negotiations to resolve the conflict.

Clinton, the former secretary of state who’s now the Democrats’ presumptive nominee for president, already has signaled a preference for a more aggressive course in Syria than Obama, including enforcement of a no-fly zone to protect Syrian civilians. Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has said he would order more aggressive military action against Islamic State but not Assad.

Former diplomats and Syria policy analysts said the memo is unlikely to force a change in Obama’s strategy toward Assad. A White House spokeswoman, Jen Friedman, on Friday acknowledged dissenting views on Obama’s Syria policy and said the administration is "always open to new or different ideas." She didn’t know if Obama had seen the dissent memo.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-17/diplomats-dissent-on-syria-is-a-signal-to-clinton-russia-too

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Diplomats’ Dissent on Syria Is a Signal to Clinton -- Russia Too (Original Post) Purveyor Jun 2016 OP
Great... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #1
And it's great for keeping people blinded to the pressing issues at hand. NWCorona Jun 2016 #3
Sadly, yes. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #5
I think it's cover for Clinton to break with Obama NWCorona Jun 2016 #2
Exactly that. JackRiddler Jun 2016 #8
That was me being a bit snarky. People here were acting like NWCorona Jun 2016 #10
While I support Hillary and this would seem to dovetail with her preferred policy, I disagree. stevenleser Jun 2016 #4
And, last time I checked... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #6
Those are many of the reasons why I think this is a bad idea. stevenleser Jun 2016 #7
But knowing how well the US is at... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #9

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
1. Great...
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jun 2016

Just what we need more war. The military industrial complex needs to make profits after all -- and the amount of people that are killed be damned.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
3. And it's great for keeping people blinded to the pressing issues at hand.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:40 AM
Jun 2016

Remember how Bush was on life support before September?

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
2. I think it's cover for Clinton to break with Obama
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jun 2016

I do find it odd that this is coming from state department people.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
10. That was me being a bit snarky. People here were acting like
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016

The State Dept acts lock step with the president when Hillary and Syria was brought up.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. While I support Hillary and this would seem to dovetail with her preferred policy, I disagree.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:41 AM
Jun 2016

If we are to do anything at all, and I am skeptical that we should, it should be narrowly focused on ISIS/ISIL, not Assad.

It's not up to us who leads Syria.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
6. And, last time I checked...
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jun 2016

Assad was fighting ISIS. Wouldn't it be counter productive to take him out? Also, isn't there a high likelihood that if we take him out ISIS would be able to move deeper into Syria during thw immediate chaos?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
7. Those are many of the reasons why I think this is a bad idea.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 12:24 PM
Jun 2016

This is a great thing to stay as far away from as possible.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
9. But knowing how well the US is at...
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 12:33 PM
Jun 2016

Staying out of the Middle East, I think that war in Syria is almost guaranteed. If we do go in, it will be Iraq 2.0 but worse because ISIS will take over and it will ensure conflict with Russia because that country is a major Syrian ally.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Diplomats’ Dissent on Syr...