Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:28 PM Nov 2012

Fitrakis awaiting news about experimental patches in Ohio, ruling by Noon

From his Facebook page at 11:20 est:

Bob Fitrakis

Fitrakis returns from federal court hearing on Ohio voting machine software patch
by Free Press staff

November 6, 2012

Bob Fitrakis just returned from court for his lawsuit to stop the software patches on voting machines in Ohio. Judge Frost has not ruled on the matter yet, and at the conclusion of the hearing at approximate 10:20am he said he would issue a ruling “forthwith,”(before noon today).

Mike Donohoe, retired National Security Agency master of computer security, testified by phone. Donohue stated that the software in question is also available for free on the internet, and he was not sure why the state of Ohio paid for it. He said it would have been more sensible for the stated purpose of the software to have placed it onto the secretary of state’s computers instead of the county computers. Donohoe also stated that it is customary, in his experience, if the Secretary of State put "experimental" software on an election system, it is usual to require hand counts in addition, in order to ensure that the added software had not affected the accuracy of the vote count, Donohoe pointed out. He also said that if a virus had been inserted through this new software, it could remain in the system. So removing the software may not remove the virus. That is why a random hand count of 5% is so important.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fitrakis awaiting news about experimental patches in Ohio, ruling by Noon (Original Post) flamingdem Nov 2012 OP
freepress.org version: Fitrakis returns from federal court hearing on Ohio voting machine software flamingdem Nov 2012 #1
Toss the effing patches, Judge! tater_salad Nov 2012 #2
I can't believe they're begging for a hand count of just flamingdem Nov 2012 #3
Ok....waiting for the update! Thanks for reporting this! loudsue Nov 2012 #4
Because no party or media outlet will support riqster Nov 2012 #5
That's why the democratic party NEEDS Howard Dean in charge loudsue Nov 2012 #6

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
1. freepress.org version: Fitrakis returns from federal court hearing on Ohio voting machine software
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:31 PM
Nov 2012
http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2012/4786

Fitrakis returns from federal court hearing on Ohio voting machine software patch
by Free Press staff
November 6, 2012
Bob Fitrakis just returned from court for his lawsuit to stop the software patches on voting machines in Ohio. Judge Frost has not ruled on the matter yet, and at the conclusion of the hearing at approximate 10:20am he said he would issue a ruling forthwith, (before noon today).

Mike Donohoe, retired National Security Agency master of computer security, testified by phone. Donohue stated that the software in question is also available for free on the internet, and he was not sure why the state of Ohio paid for it. He said it would have been more sensible for the stated purpose of the software to have placed it onto the secretary of states computers instead of the county computers. Donohoe also stated that it is customary, in his experience, if the Secretary of State put "experimental" software on an election system, it is usual to require hand counts in addition, in order to ensure that the added software had not affected the accuracy of the vote count, Donohoe pointed out. He also said that if a virus had been inserted through this new software, it could remain in the system. So removing the software may not remove the virus. That is why a random hand count of 5% is so important.

tater_salad

(12 posts)
2. Toss the effing patches, Judge!
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:47 PM
Nov 2012

This shouldn't be an issue even under consideration for a presidential election let alone to have it happening in the state that will decide this election. Effing nuts. [Fingers, toes and eyes crossed till decision rendered.]

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
3. I can't believe they're begging for a hand count of just
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 12:50 PM
Nov 2012

5% of the votes impacted.

I suppose that would trigger a recount.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
4. Ok....waiting for the update! Thanks for reporting this!
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 01:37 PM
Nov 2012

I've pretty much had it with Ohio. Why don't those people throw these crooks out of office?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
5. Because no party or media outlet will support
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:00 PM
Nov 2012

...the effort to clean the state up. It has been too for too many years, and the state Dems don't play to win- they play to not lose.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
6. That's why the democratic party NEEDS Howard Dean in charge
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 02:11 PM
Nov 2012

And until the grassroots makes it happen, it's going to be this way.

I'm sick of a Democratic party that won't fight for what is right, and fight to WIN.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fitrakis awaiting news ab...