2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumExpecting a call shortly from my "friend" in the Ohio Democratic Party...
...who promises a personal mid-day update.
barbtries
(28,798 posts)post it in this thread maybe? i'll have it bookmarked.
TomClash
(11,344 posts)You are slow.
In a nutshell, we are winning comfortably amidst a heavy turnout.
K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)brooklynite
(94,594 posts)Faith9326
(304 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Wednesdays
(17,380 posts)TheOther95Percent
(1,035 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)outsideworld
(601 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)ssaphyre
(26 posts)later also.
Mz Pip
(27,451 posts)Some of the stories about what is happening there is pretty demoralizing. Seems like a big hot mess.
ffr
(22,670 posts)I'd have him keep his information to himself until the OH elections officials release their official numbers.
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)...but knows what the turnout models are saying and how smoothly the voting process is going.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Not actual votes.
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)Voting turnout is high; not as good as 2008 but better than 2010. High turnout of students and minority voters. Large number of early votes already banked. Voting machine issues are being dealt with by their legal team and are being fixed or replaced. Their technical experts and legal people (ditto Chicago) ARE NOT WORRIED about the software patch issue affecting vote accuracy. Expect votes to come out starting 7:45. Will take longer than 2008 to get a tally, but expect one tonight.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Voting turnout is high; not as good as 2008 but better than 2010.
2010 is a pretty low bar, is it not?
That has me worried that high turnout from the Republicans could swamp us there.
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)...and it's as important to see WHO is coming out to vote.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)or that our gross turnout is down, or that our turnout relative to the bad guys is down?
Sorry for the peppering of questions.
IfPalinisAnswerWatsQ
(452 posts)The source saying turnout is better than 2010 but <2008... Is she talking about voting today only? How does she factor in the early votes? We have some decent room in OH. Our early voting numbers are lower I imagine but a 2 pt win is just as good as a 4 pt winZ
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)...didn't ask how students/minority scaled to 2008; I only had a 2-3 minute window.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)mac56
(17,569 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)I assume you mean 7:45 EST?
fugop
(1,828 posts)... but I'm encouraged by the fact that they don't seem worried about the voting issues. I would have liked turnout to be closer to 2008, because "better than 2010" is a bit of a downer (since 2010 sucked).
Anyway, glad to hear they think we'll get a tally tonight. Crossing my fingers, frankly, that we don't need Ohio for the win, just in case...
TomClash
(11,344 posts)Was that the minority vote percentage was better than expected and Dem areas were a bit higher than non-Dem areas. She was pretty optimistic.
fugop
(1,828 posts)smorkingapple
(827 posts)is a waste of time and even Chicago admits it?