Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinto

(106,886 posts)
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:25 PM Nov 2012

Just a side comment among all the hoopla - Ohio and Florida may not matter, electorally.

Consider this -

New Hampshire - 4 electoral votes
Pennsylvania - 20
Virginia - 13
Wisconsin -10
Colorado - 9

Results in 279 electoral votes for President Obama, given the other reliably blue states (assume a win in Nevada here).

Recounts in Florida and Ohio may be needed for the record, but not the electoral outcome. And both states' tallies are needed for the eventual popular vote count.

Follow-up on voting process irregularities will be vital for future election security. That shouldn't go by the wayside, whatever the outcome.

Yet in this scenario, all can take place in their own time without the outcome hinging on an ambiguous electoral count.

Just my two cents. Was growing tired of the endless cable discussions of how many paths would result in a Romney victory. So I looked for one for Obama that didn't include a focus on Ohio or Florida.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just a side comment among all the hoopla - Ohio and Florida may not matter, electorally. (Original Post) pinto Nov 2012 OP
Yup, I'm counting on Virginia tonight Faith9326 Nov 2012 #1
I want 'em all. nt Cognitive_Resonance Nov 2012 #2
LOL. Me too. pinto Nov 2012 #4
That is my hope, that Ohio and Florida will become irrelevant. Avalux Nov 2012 #3
me too! faithfulcitizen Nov 2012 #5
Interactive electoral map for your pleasure Fla Dem Nov 2012 #6
Thanks. I toyed around with the LA Times "Predict a winner: Battleground states" - pinto Nov 2012 #7
Understood. BlueDemKev Nov 2012 #8
We don't need them both PsychProfessor Nov 2012 #9
You forgot New Hampshire BlueDemKev Nov 2012 #10
That's good. LisaL Nov 2012 #11

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
3. That is my hope, that Ohio and Florida will become irrelevant.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:35 PM
Nov 2012

And their asshole governors can go cry with Romney somewhere.

(no offense to Dems living in those states)

Fla Dem

(23,690 posts)
6. Interactive electoral map for your pleasure
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 03:43 PM
Nov 2012

Just for reference: this is how the map looks today on 11/6. Obama 303/ Romney 220 /Tied 15



Got that from this site.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/

But here is a cool interactive map where you can plot your own senarios.

http://www.270towin.com/

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
8. Understood.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 04:16 PM
Nov 2012

But I'm not totally convinced we're going to win both Virginia and Colorado. There are a hell of a lot of conservatives living in both those states (shit, they both voted for Bob Dole!!). I never thought I'd live to see the day when VA and CO would become competitive. It IS nice to see though.

PsychProfessor

(204 posts)
9. We don't need them both
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 04:20 PM
Nov 2012

If we take Iowa, the typical Blue states, and VA the President has 270 votes and is re-elected.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Just a side comment among...