Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Columbus Free Press

(141 posts)
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 05:28 PM Nov 2012

Free Press TRO denied in state court also

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2012/4797

Breaking News: Results of today’s hearing in state court on the uncertified and untested software
by Free Press staff
November 6, 2012
Bob Fitrakis returned from state Common Pleas Court, reporting that Judge Sherrott ruled against him regarding his request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to remove the uncertified, untested software from some Ohio voting machines. However, the judge left open the possibility that the case could be heard after the election, if there is evidence of election tampering. The judge declined to interfere in an on-going election, but indicated that he would consider taking action as the case continues after the election if it was needed. So, in conclusion, in both the federal and state cases, expert witness Michael Duniho who worked for the National Security Agency (NSA) spelled out in great detail the threat to Ohio’s voting system by the secret, uncertified, and untested software.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Free Press TRO denied in state court also (Original Post) Columbus Free Press Nov 2012 OP
At least there's something on record now. octoberlib Nov 2012 #1
Thanks for the info TroyD Nov 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Free Press TRO denied in ...