Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 02:35 PM Jun 2016

Clinton ally stands between Sanders and chairmanship dream

By Alexander Bolton - 06/29/16 01:19 PM EDT

Bernie Sanders wants to chair the Health Committee next year if Democrats take over the Senate.

There’s one problem. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), a strong ally of Hillary Clinton, may not give up the position.

Murray says she loves the Health panel and the alternative, taking over the Appropriations Committee, is not as enticing as it used to be given today's fierce battles over spending and the abolishment of earmarks.

Murray is signaling to colleagues that she’s very happy in her current role and would relish the chance to work with Clinton on major issues.

“She loves the work she is doing on the Health Committee to fight for policies that help women, students, families, seniors, workers and the economy — and there is a whole lot more that she’d like to get done,” said her spokesman, Eli Zupnick.

Murray told The Hill Tuesday that she has “not had a specific conversation” with Clinton’s inner circle about how they might work together next year if Democrats control both the White House and Senate, as they hope.

But Democratic lawmakers on the panel say Murray talks as though she expects to return as its Democratic leader in the next Congress.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/285964-clinton-ally-stands-between-sanders-and-chairmanship-dream

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton ally stands between Sanders and chairmanship dream (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 OP
Go Patty Murray! Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 #1
She is friends with Senator Warren as well. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #12
Isn't she the one who urged Warren to run for the Senate spooky3 Jun 2016 #34
Ya, I did a post on it here.......... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #37
Thanks, sheshe2! spooky3 Jun 2016 #39
You are welcome, spooky! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #40
I love her! pandr32 Jun 2016 #26
Politics requires give and take. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #2
What? What does Murray have to do with him losing? brush Jun 2016 #3
It'll be worked out. If we get the Senate, no one Hortensis Jun 2016 #25
Hillary can make it happen if she chooses. peace13 Jun 2016 #5
she has no reason to nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #7
Just saying peace13 Jun 2016 #15
it's not being taken away from him, it was never his nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #6
Patty Murray has earned the job. If she wants it, it's hers, period. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #4
Isnt Bernie already the lead on budget committee? JaneyVee Jun 2016 #8
not really, it's very dry stuff, mostly about making sure numbers add up nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #23
I hope Murray keeps her chairmanship... SaschaHM Jun 2016 #10
The abolishment of earmarks really crippled how the senate works Blue_Adept Jun 2016 #11
Now that is God's own truth. Ending earmarks comradebillyboy Jun 2016 #17
Yup. The inability to engage in horsetrading pretty much did it all in. Blue_Adept Jun 2016 #19
Transparency metroins Jun 2016 #24
If it takes earmarks to make the government functional again comradebillyboy Jun 2016 #38
Earmarks was hardly wasteful it was less than 1% of the budget. JRLeft Jun 2016 #45
K&R sheshe2 Jun 2016 #13
So Bernie is holding out for a position? sufrommich Jun 2016 #14
You can't say it hasn't happened before. peace13 Jun 2016 #16
Cabinet seats are for closers. Or something. n/t Orsino Jun 2016 #43
"Murray would relish the chance to work with Clinton" .. to keep single-payer DOA. nt 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #18
Bernie killed his own Single-Payer amendment in 2009. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #28
K&R mcar Jun 2016 #20
Murray gives and gives and gives . . . to Boeing and Ryan. Sorry. George Eliot Jun 2016 #21
Fwiw, I see that snot Jun 2016 #22
Bernie shouldn't get to jump the line. Seniority matters. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #27
VP Patty Murray. Mischief managed. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #29
Mischief managed? nt Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 #30
If Murray's been doing a good job, there is BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #31
Nope. Bernie does not deserve that. nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #32
Is there a committe for renaming post offices? cosmicone Jun 2016 #33
As long as he is an Independent, there will be no MineralMan Jun 2016 #35
A Chair who'll work with the Administration vs a Chair who'll go it alone... brooklynite Jun 2016 #36
Bernie should get nothing except get in line for the position, behind the current chair. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #41
ImWithHer and Murray too. oasis Jun 2016 #42
There's absolutely no reason why she should give up her position! MoonRiver Jun 2016 #44

pandr32

(11,588 posts)
26. I love her!
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jun 2016

She was our senator until we recently moved away. She was always responsive to her constituents and engaged in important issues.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
2. Politics requires give and take.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jun 2016

Apparently there is one Senator who refuses to give, even though it's over, so it looks like what he wants will be taken away.

brush

(53,788 posts)
3. What? What does Murray have to do with him losing?
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jun 2016

Why should she give up her seat? What committees were Sanders on before? They don't want him back?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
25. It'll be worked out. If we get the Senate, no one
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:11 PM
Jun 2016

will be "losing," and right now they're all positioning themselves for what they want. Murray is next in line and eager to work with Hillary on these issues, so she will get the position unless she accepts an offer of something even more desirable.

Personally, I would like Sanders to be satisfied, but putting any Democrat in any Senate leadership position where he would work in opposition to the Democrat in the Oval Office seems like a really bad idea. In all likelihood he would be better on any of the committees, as leader or otherwise, where his positions would be basically in line with hers.

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #9)

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
10. I hope Murray keeps her chairmanship...
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 03:08 PM
Jun 2016

She's earned it. I doubt Bernie's post-primary tour makes anyone in the potential Clinton White House or the Senate Dem leadership jump for joy at the thought of working with him to get passable legislation through. There's still time, but Dems are going to have enough of a fight from the republicans on their hand. I doubt anyone wants a Chairman going rogue.

comradebillyboy

(10,154 posts)
17. Now that is God's own truth. Ending earmarks
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 04:07 PM
Jun 2016

ended the biggest incentive for compromise and cooperation.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
19. Yup. The inability to engage in horsetrading pretty much did it all in.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 04:54 PM
Jun 2016

And it almost never gets a mention. I mean, I get the whole problem with the "bridge to nowhere" thing, but a lot of stuff got done because of things far beyond that.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
24. Transparency
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:07 PM
Jun 2016

I'd rather get rid of earmarks and be somewhat transparent than have my tax dollars wasted on useless things.

Congress needs to learn to compromise, which means the GOP needs to come to the middle. There's a lot of middle dems, not so much Rs. We don't need to bribe them to vote for common sense legislation.

comradebillyboy

(10,154 posts)
38. If it takes earmarks to make the government functional again
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jun 2016

I will welcome the change with open arms.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
45. Earmarks was hardly wasteful it was less than 1% of the budget.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 10:36 AM
Jun 2016

It's a great way to get money to districts and states.

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)
28. Bernie killed his own Single-Payer amendment in 2009.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jun 2016

It was in the middle of being read into the record, when he stopped it.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
21. Murray gives and gives and gives . . . to Boeing and Ryan. Sorry.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 05:03 PM
Jun 2016

She is a quiet go-along when we need real change. Not crazy about either of our senators but prefer Cantwell who stood up with Feingold and tries to monitor financial interests. More than Murray does.

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
31. If Murray's been doing a good job, there is
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:53 PM
Jun 2016

NO reason whatsoever to change her leadership role. She has earned it. Some others have not.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
35. As long as he is an Independent, there will be no
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jun 2016

Senate committee chairs available to him. When he becomes Senator Sanders (D-VT), something might be possible if Democrats control the Senate. Bernie could help that happen with an enthusiastic endorsement that would increase turnout.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton ally stands betwe...