Even more so if you subtract KS, Utah, Nebraska and maybe Arizona and add NH, Maine, Ohio and Michigan.

Yes to Michigan and Ohio; no to Nebraska and Kansas.

Maine will NOT vote for Donald Rump, and neither will New Hampshire!

I wouldn't be too sure about Georgia, West Virginia or Missouri, either!

PEACE!

1 will go Dem. 2? Who knows? Worst case 2-2 EV.

A candidate who wins in each CD must necessarily have the statewide win, for a 4-0 sweep.

If two candidates each win one CD, then the statewide win (and a 3-1 edge in electoral votes) goes to the one with the larger winning margin.

In the wildly unlikely event of a significant third party with enough statewide support to finish second in each CD but first overall, there could be a 2-1-1 split, but I can't see any way to get to 2-2.

Thought it was possible. To split the vote cor POTUS

violet if not solid blue

Michigan is going to be BLUE!

thinks Trump will win Michigan. Boooooo

But doubtful.

Nebraska and Kansas, nor will Utah be going blue.

Utah is a strong Romney state and Romney is anti-Trump, so enough Utah Republicans could go for Johnson and throw the state to Hillary.

latest projection (July 22, 2016) is nothing less than an absolute debacle for Trump.

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2016-president/

I also think Florida will be really tough. I doubt think North Carolina goes Blue either. On the other hand Ohio might be in play. Drumpt's ego is such that he might put alot of resources into California and waste his time.

There's a lot of dislike for Trump, which could translate into Republican apathy; combine that with crossover voting by moderate Republican women, and we could pull it off. But the apathy would disappear in a strong anti-gun campaign.

I don't think we need AZ to win the presidency, but I'd really like to see things shift left here.

MT go blue this time around, especially if Hillary campaigns there. That may be true for WY as well because the demographics and voting mentalities are similar, except that WY has a smaller percentage of Native Americans in its population.

I know that there aren't that many electoral votes in either state, but it's the principle and if Clinton-Kaine run a 50-state campaign as they say they will, we may be able to knock off MT's Rep Zinke (a dolt). Denise Juneau is running a good campaign against him and the Native American vote (the largest minority at just under 7%) will be out in full force to support her (in MT, they're "Blue" voters, as a rule!). Hopefully, Bullock also retains the gubernatorial seat there.

Trump-Pence epitomize too much hate and bad behavior for most Montanans I know (of both parties) and women especially are turned off by that ticket. Many of those who might have voted GOP this time around will vote for Gary Johnson (there are still RON Paul signs standing in some areas of the state, LOL). Others will either not vote or - very quietly and without fanfare - support the Dem ticket. There will be the stalwart RW nutcases who will support Trump-Pence no matter what, but ....

Ohio will be blue. We need numbers/volume - and since Trump is targeting Kasich now . . . Kasich has nothing to lose by ensuring Trump doesn't win by shenanigans. Add in that I strongly suspect Kasich runs in 2020 with the slogan - I Told You So.

There is an adult in Ohio - whether we agree with him politically or not. And he doesn't have to come out for Clinton or bash Trump.

With a strong showing for the Libertarians (enough to drain the air out of the Rs)

Kansas is some serious Wizard of Oz fantasy, and NE isn't far behind.

if she does, I'll disown her!

Swap Michigan for Utah, Kansas and Nebraska, and the result is almost the same.

So far, I haven't seen or heard any political ads for this race...this is because neither side believes it is in playm

Especially in the plains states. But too much red in the heart of the Midwest. I think Hillary takes Ohio. And she should take Michigan.

Clinton 42.9 Trump 41.2

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-ohio-president-trump-vs-clinton

Oh, well, you see my point. Besides, I guessing the map is going to be a whole lot bluer, A whole lot bluer!

The state is Clinton's to lose.

LePage, winning both terms as governor by splitting the vote with a shady third party opponent, has become one of the most vilified governors in the state's history, and Maine has voted Democratic in the last six elections, with Barack Obama winning by 15 percent over Mitt Romney in 2012.

Kansas and Nebraska are not going blue and Maine and Michigan are not going red.

However the end result is right. Its going to be a blowout win for Hillary Clinton.

I don't want to underestimate Trump but winning a primary is different than winning a general election.

I don't believe she'll win North Carolina either, but think she does win Ohio. Even your map minus the 3 states I mention she's still +300.

Your map indicates what SHOULD happen given the opponent, but Hillary is not going to win those states.

Romney is anti-Trump and Utah was the strongest Romney state in the country. That combination could reslt in enough Utah Republicans voting for Gary Johnson to throw the state into Hillary's column.

But I think we can get Ohio and Michigan, Maine and NH.

Obama won twice...and today's steel need trade with China and trade agreements.

we could have lost Ohio and still won in 12.

If Hillary has lost Michigan, she's lost PA and FL and NC, and probably VA. The white working class in Michigan leans Dem, and there are plenty of POC there too. It goes without saying there's no way she's winning AZ/UT in an election she's losing Michigan.

I think Hillary's ceiling is 400 electoral votes if the DNC runs a crash operation in Texas and spurs record Hispanic turnout.

Even Republicans aren't happy with Pence, and many of them LOATHE Trump. It's possible!