Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:30 AM Jul 2016

I had hoped for a progressive-liberal VP pick

I learned Sen. Kaine is a moderate and supports TPP, correct me if I am wrong.

I had hoped for a progressive-liberal. I am disappointed in Hillary's VP pick. I thought she would want to reach out to the Democratic base of progressives. Bernie had stoked the fires of millions, and she is not reaching out to the ready populous of progressives.

I heard her decision for a Democratic moderate was to reach out to republican moderates. I am sure her strategy would be to reach the masses in order to win. Yet, I think she went in the wrong direction. The Democratic base was stoked and ready, why not jump on that train?

We will learn more about him in time and I will keep an open mind, yet concerned.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I had hoped for a progressive-liberal VP pick (Original Post) Equinox Moon Jul 2016 OP
He's already said that he will match Hillary in her opposition of TPP Joe the Revelator Jul 2016 #1
Sorry to hear this, Equinox Moon Jul 2016 #3
Actually I totally blew that OP, edited 'support' for 'opposition" Joe the Revelator Jul 2016 #14
Hmmm... Equinox Moon Jul 2016 #18
It's all a conspiracy, isn't it? yardwork Jul 2016 #37
He also WON multiple times in VA by opposing the NRA, coal and the death penalty Joe the Revelator Jul 2016 #2
Kaine is progressive. Less so than some on banking, but a solid progressive on social issues. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #4
So, a social progressive & fiscal moderate? Equinox Moon Jul 2016 #6
That's a more fair assessment than the people calling him a right-winger. He's on our side, clearly. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #12
He seems to have changed his mind yesterday concerning TPP Mass Jul 2016 #5
Thanks for the excerpt, that helps Equinox Moon Jul 2016 #13
WE ARE GOOD TO GO! Her Sister Jul 2016 #7
Hillary does not support TPP Cattledog Jul 2016 #8
Now... Yurovsky Jul 2016 #32
I like this part in this link on dkos DemonGoddess Jul 2016 #9
We've got the capable team C_U_L8R Jul 2016 #10
I had hoped PROGRESSIVES would do a couple of minutes of leg work on the candidates too ... uponit7771 Jul 2016 #11
All true progressives are already voting for her auntpurl Jul 2016 #15
Kaine will play well kwolf68 Jul 2016 #16
Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia's in play this cycle...etc etc. auntpurl Jul 2016 #22
It doesn't sound like you are keeping an open mind... jcgoldie Jul 2016 #17
I don't think his support of "right to work" laws will help him much with rust belt Dems. nt Snotcicles Jul 2016 #21
All I know about "righ to work" is that it destroyed Wisconsin and their Unions. Equinox Moon Jul 2016 #24
Thanks to Governor Pence, you can add Indiana too. Right to work for less is a Republican B Calm Jul 2016 #26
Governor Snyder of Michigan, another stinking Republican, same thing. nt Snotcicles Jul 2016 #30
That's all it does wherever it is law. It's right to work for less. Snotcicles Jul 2016 #28
So maybe you know more about him in regard to that issue than I jcgoldie Jul 2016 #29
Oh no no no. You got it all wrong. MyNameGoesHere Jul 2016 #19
I am smiling. You must be a journalist. Equinox Moon Jul 2016 #20
Have you read up on him? tallahasseedem Jul 2016 #23
The OP obviously has not done its homework. riversedge Jul 2016 #27
You GOT a VERY progressive-liberal VP pick. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #25
Because she can't win with just the democratic base rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #31
As a lifelong Virginian, dgibby Jul 2016 #33
You can't always get what you want. redstatebluegirl Jul 2016 #34
Look, people here were bitching about how Brown and Warren needed to stay in the Senate. emulatorloo Jul 2016 #35
So, so concerned. It's terribly concerning. yardwork Jul 2016 #36
 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
14. Actually I totally blew that OP, edited 'support' for 'opposition"
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jul 2016

The entire ticket will OPPOSE TPP. Huge f up on my part, posting without coffee!

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
2. He also WON multiple times in VA by opposing the NRA, coal and the death penalty
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:34 AM
Jul 2016

Do you know how progressive those stances were/are in VA in the 2000's?

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
12. That's a more fair assessment than the people calling him a right-winger. He's on our side, clearly.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:42 AM
Jul 2016

There's a small undercurrent of people who were backing Bernie on here who have made it clear they believe fiscal issues are the only ones that define whether or not you are progressive. To them, only Bernie and Warren are progressives in the Senate, so they were the only acceptable picks. To the rest of us, who realize how important the fights for social equality are too, that approach shrinks what is supposed to be our big tent. If one issues is enough to dump Kaine, what kind of party can we ever have?

Mass

(27,315 posts)
5. He seems to have changed his mind yesterday concerning TPP
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jul 2016

so at least he understands his stance is not popular.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-tim-kaine-vice-president_us_577ec219e4b0c590f7e8a3e9?795jn05tnb8x5hfr

In addition, a Clinton aide told The Huffington Post that Kaine had told the former secretary of state that he would oppose President Barack Obama’s signature trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, in its current form. The aide said that at some point in Kaine and Clinton’s two conversations prior to the selection ― which she made Friday night, eight days after the first meeting ― he agreed with her that a trade deal had to meet certain criteria on protecting wages and national security, and that the TPP did not.


It was not my choice either, but we have to live with this choice because frankly, the alternative is not acceptable. I have to say I do not understand the logic of this choice of a white eastern coast moderate Democrat on so many progressive or mid westerner or hispanic (some combining several of these characteristcs), but it's a done deal and we have to live with it, with as much enthusiasm as possible.

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
13. Thanks for the excerpt, that helps
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:43 AM
Jul 2016

The TPP is a disaster to the plant environmentally. I wonder where he stands on caring for the planet and global warming?

Cattledog

(5,915 posts)
8. Hillary does not support TPP
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jul 2016

"The Trans Pacific Partnership, which includes the US and 11 other nations, is the largest regional trade agreement in history. But as of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it. I don't believe it's going to meet the high bar I have set for creating jobs and advancing national security. I am also worried about currency manipulation not being part of the agreement, and that pharmaceutical companies may have gotten more benefits from the deal than their patients."

Source: PBS.org on 2015 presidential hopefuls , Oct 7, 2015

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
32. Now...
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:15 AM
Jul 2016

but it won't matter either way if it goes through before Inauguration Day. Perhaps it'll all work out, but I'm not sold on her level of opposition to bad trade deals that weaken domestic labor.

Look, I've gone away post-primary and figured I'd just suffer through the summer and hope for the best. But I think HRC should have chosen a progressive VP rather than someone who is center-right. I don't think it'll sway the vote one way or another, but I do think it's a passive-aggressive move against her Left flank/Bernie supporters. Not sure if the numbers work out better for her WRT Virginia in November, but I think she wouldn't lose it to Trump unless there was a complete collapse or unforeseen scandal that flipped the script in the last days of the campaign. I just wish she would've chose someone with more bona-ride progressive credentials.

That's about all I have to say about that...

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)
9. I like this part in this link on dkos
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jul 2016
Madame Secretary knows she doesn’t need to rally the base because Trump is a human-base-rallying -bomb. I do not worry that my son will vote for Gary Johnson this November if there is a snowballs chance Donnie Darko could win. Ohio is going to be a wasteland for Trump thanks to John Kasich. Pennsylvania will not be close. Sanders (my very moderate wife pick) or Warren (mine) might gin up the base an iota but Hillary is pushing this campaign deeper into rebel territory than General Sherman.


http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/7/22/1551239/-Kaine-Is-Not-Safe-Pick-Hillary-Is-Going-For-A-Rout

Something that you, and many others NEED to understand, is that the majority of voters are not left or right, they're moderate. Hillary is liberal, she needed to balance that. Before anyone starts arguing with me about "DLC" "Third Way" and "Centrist", kindly remember that she got into loads of trouble as FLOTUS because she is liberal. She cost her husband his governorship the first time, because she refused to take his last name, initially. Those are not the actions of a centrist.

C_U_L8R

(45,003 posts)
10. We've got the capable team
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jul 2016

Versus raging hair-on-fire loose cannon without a lick of experience Trump.

I'm very happy with capable.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
11. I had hoped PROGRESSIVES would do a couple of minutes of leg work on the candidates too ...
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jul 2016

... correct me if I'm wrong but that hope seems to be dashed by the consummate repeating of winger memes.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
15. All true progressives are already voting for her
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:44 AM
Jul 2016

because they are forward-thinking, compassionate people who know that the most disadvantaged of people in society will suffer the most under a Trump presidency. They don't allow their personal ideology to make them selfish and hold out for someone who is "pure". They know that the best way to move forward with a progressive agenda is to get Hillary elected and then work their tails off for progressive candidates at all levels of government.

Anyone who isn't voting for Hillary because she isn't "pure" enough for them is a Hillary hater, not a progressive.

Tim Kaine wasn't my first choice, but I am open minded to learn more about him. What I've heard so far, and particularly from Virginia DUers who have known and worked with him personally, is that he's a kind, decent man with strong Democratic credentials. A man who's never lost an election, who knows how to talk to all sorts of people and connect with them, who would be ready to assume the presidency if god forbid something should happen.

He's a good pick.

kwolf68

(7,365 posts)
16. Kaine will play well
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jul 2016

In Virginia and Pennsylvania, perhaps Ohio too.

My choice was Jeff Merkley, but he wasn't ever going to get the nomination (no more so than Liz or Bern). It's just the reality of the matter, Clinton needs to look at more than ideological purity to win this thing.

Honestly, this choice was probably brilliant.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
22. Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia's in play this cycle...etc etc.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jul 2016

It's a great pick I think.

My choice was Xavier Becerra. Less likely than Merkley probably even!

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
17. It doesn't sound like you are keeping an open mind...
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:46 AM
Jul 2016

Sounds like you have already labeled him without much evidence. The other point is regardless of his ideology, the VP pick does not drive policy it wins votes or it doesn't. If Kaine helps win the election in Va and the rust belt then he was the right choice even if he doesn't make Sanders supporters feel warm and fuzzy.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
26. Thanks to Governor Pence, you can add Indiana too. Right to work for less is a Republican
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:05 AM
Jul 2016

platform.

 

Snotcicles

(9,089 posts)
28. That's all it does wherever it is law. It's right to work for less.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jul 2016

It is a corporate tool to destroy the middle class.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
29. So maybe you know more about him in regard to that issue than I
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:11 AM
Jul 2016

I'll look forward to reading and understanding his history there. But I will say this... I'm a union guy myself in Illinois, and if those union guys like the ones I work with aren't already supporting Clinton then it isn't because of TPP or Right to Work or any other single issue... it's more likely because of something about her that Tim Kaine or nobody else could help her with. Or maybe I should say something about themselves.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
19. Oh no no no. You got it all wrong.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:52 AM
Jul 2016

You concern OP is all out of order. You did well in the opening title with grabbing the attention of like minded people. Then you kind of added a smattering of "see this is bad" points. You kind of effectively added a why can't you people see I am right and x is the answer you should be supporting. But then came the worst mistake made by a concerned person, it was all the way at the end. Rookie mistake I am sure and I am happy to share more insight into crafting a proper concern OP if you wish.

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
20. I am smiling. You must be a journalist.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 10:57 AM
Jul 2016

I am not. Thanks for the tips.

I am concerned and learning about him, both.

But let's be clear, the fascist - tea-party ticket is a nightmare!

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
25. You GOT a VERY progressive-liberal VP pick.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:04 AM
Jul 2016

What's the problem? Kaine is a Social Justice Liberal, not a moderate.

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
33. As a lifelong Virginian,
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jul 2016

I am 100% in favor of Tim Kaine for VP. Although I don't know him personally, a close friend of mine (hair on fire liberal) does, and she is thrilled at his selection. He is well loved in Va., and has done many good things for us. I voted for Bernie in the Primary, but am supporting Hillary now, and happy she picked Tim as her running mate. Do I agree with him on everything? No, but I'm with him about 95% of the time.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
34. You can't always get what you want.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jul 2016

The progressives in our party got a great deal in the platform. Your candidate lost in the primary, you cannot expect to get the whole pie. I trust Secretary Clinton to do what is best in terms of beating Donald Trumper. I am sorry you are "concerned" but if that concern translates into voting for anyone other than Secretary Clinton, or staying home, you are helping elect a fascist as President. Nobody gets everything they want in a party or a candidate.

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
35. Look, people here were bitching about how Brown and Warren needed to stay in the Senate.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jul 2016

As they were too valuable there, and that they would be wasted in the VP spot.

Now everyone is bitching because HRC left them in the Senate.

I will also point out that my Primary candidate Bernie Sanders actively reached out to moderate Republican voters.

It was good when Bernie appealed to Republican voters, but it is apparently bad when HRC does it.

In other words, the goalposts keep moving.

To me Kaine is dull and boring. I would have preferred Warren.

However attempts to demonize Kaine as some kind of evil right-winger don't sit well with me, because it is false.

The platform is progressive, HRC's policy positions are to the left, which Bernie confirmed in his endorsement.

Kaine is on board, her prerequisite was that he oppose the TPP etc and he agreed.

yardwork

(61,650 posts)
36. So, so concerned. It's terribly concerning.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 12:11 PM
Jul 2016

You are concerned. This is a concern.

There's a group called Concerned Women of America. Check them out. They'll have a lot of power if Trump gets in the White House.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I had hoped for a progres...