Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:13 PM Jul 2016

"Shills and Scandals: The misleading #DNCLeaks, tweet by tweet."

Shills and Scandals: The misleading #DNCLeaks, tweet by tweet

http://www.amalanetwork.com/2016/07/23/shills-and-scandals-the-misleading-dncleaks-tweet-by-tweet/

"Three days before the DNC is scheduled to begin, Wikileaks dropped a bombshell on the public. Their leak purportedly contains 20,000 emails concerning people within the DNC, as well as their interactions with donors, media, and others.

The leak was announced with a series of tweets—some containing screenshots of text from emails—and links to said emails on their website. Several of these tweets are framed in a compromising way against the DNC and those involved, but examination of their source shows Wikileaks is being a little bit misleading with the public; some tweets make assumptions regarding the information of the emails that don’t really hold up under scrutiny, while others seem to omit important information at odds with Wikileaks’ presentation.

We’ll be looking at ten tweets from #DNCLeaks, comparing the information to the framing used by Wikileaks."

More at link.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
3. Sorry, couldn't find anything on Breitbart or Moonie Times for ya
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jul 2016

That's actually a pretty moving story about the site founder, so thanks for highlighting it.

Article itself is well reasoned and researched.

okieinpain

(9,397 posts)
4. I just left a website that was
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jul 2016

Rinning the story and if you take the emails out of context or look at them with a narrow view, yeah they are terrible. You put them in the correct perspective and it's just office chit chat.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
5. The bolded passage sounds like an excellent summary of the past few months on DU.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:26 PM
Jul 2016

Misleading sources that don't hold up under scrutiny and omit important information. Who needs context!

The intent and context of some of the leaked e-mails that many have already focused on are certainly not as clear as some assert them to be. I suspect there will be a lot of that in the coming days.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
7. color me shocked that a rapist would lie to prevent a woman from becoming President
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jul 2016

of course Assange likes Trump they both have the same opinion of women.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
9. not only that but they never did any public smear about Sanders religion
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:35 PM
Jul 2016

just gripes in a private email about someone they didn't like

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
10. Ah, ... fuckin wow wiki leaks... way to totally remove benefit of the doubt !!! Sounds like
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jul 2016

... a total rat fuck.

FAUX news is trying to raise the notion of dem party split...

Seems "coordinated"

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. They had been sued by Sanders and accused of money laundering
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 09:01 PM
Jul 2016

by Sanders, so yeah some catty gossipy chatter was going to happen.

No indication any of this influenced a single pledged delegate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Shills and Scandals: The...