2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMelania Trump's Nude Pics do indeed tell us a LOT, and we shouldn't be afraid of it
Number one, most libs are not at all phased by nudity, art, even porn. So that a model posed for nude pics back in her beginning is hardly *news*. BUT...
Two: I do remember when a big fucking deal was made about Michelle Obama's exposed arms, so I'm just sayin' on that one
But here's the real deal (and it will *bother* the Trumps too) I think those pics are real; I don't think they are scandalous per se, but they DO indeed show that Melania Trump has had a lot of work done...a LOT, and I am only talking about her face. What kind of message are we sending our girls if someone as beautiful as a model is having all that work done to her face...didn't she think she was valuable enough as she was? Self reliance? Self acceptance? Does she get something tweaked each time Donald criticizes "ugly" females?
Is Melania Trump's MULTIPLE plastic surgeries the result of Donald Trump's America? Is THAT all she thought she was worth?
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)is that they were released as a DIRECT REACTION to the traction the Khan story is getting. They are a deliberate distraction from a story that could be the seed that destroy's Trump's campaign. That's it. The rest is petty, politically speaking (although I understand your point).
SticksnStones
(2,108 posts)and not The Daily News backs up your assertion, IMO.
The Post is pro Trump.
This is his continued attempt to try and control the news cycle.
We need to keep talking about the convention, The Khans and not let him change topics.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)It's clear his own rah-rah rag, The NY Post,
is desperately trying to help Trump change the
topic off the Khans. He botched that one so badly
it's a sure bet that Trump is behind this ploy.
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump supplied the photos.
SticksnStones
(2,108 posts)without his go-ahead.
We dems gotta keep our eyes on the prize!
C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)Brimming with vision, optimism, goodness and heap load of experience and skill.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Just lost the evangelical vote. She's tampered in dark-sided stuff.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Melania had good business reasons as a model. But it is sad Ivanka felt they would make her life better.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Instead of -as Pence thought he should- telling people to pray away their lustful sex urges, the hypocrisy of the GOP -with their "porn is a national health crisis" platform- becomes the only legitimate angle as to why this might be relevant.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/07/mike-pence-condoms-very-poor-protection-against-stds.html
But beyond that, no, I dont give a shit what pictures she took or what she did with her own body as long as she was a consenting adult, and as far as Michelle goes we should not stoop to their level.
When they go low, we go high.
Vinca
(50,304 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)life to know your husband could easily 'upgrade' to a newer model.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Because of all the pressure they're under to constantly look perfect, they never feel thin enough, pretty enough etc. I'm sure being married to a misogynist asshole, while going through the normal aging process, doesn't help either.