Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 09:43 AM Jul 2016

WaPo Editorial: The conventions are done, and it’s clear what is at stake in this year’s election

By Editorial Board July 30 at 8:48 PM

IN A normal political year, the presidential election might have ended at the electrifying moment that Khizr Khan, addressing the Democratic convention in Philadelphia, pulled a copy of the Constitution from his jacket pocket and challenged the Republican nominee.

“Donald Trump, you are asking Americans to trust you with our future,” said Mr. Khan, whose son Humayun Khan, a U.S. Army captain and a proud Muslim American, was killed while protecting his men in Iraq in 2004. “Let me ask you: Have you even read the U.S. Constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy. In this document, look for the words ‘liberty’ and ‘equal protection of law.’?”

But in this unusual year, it may not be disqualifying that Mr. Trump has disparaged Muslims, Mexicans and so many others. It may not be disqualifying that he has little knowledge of the Constitution or regard for the principles embodied in it. Two-thirds of the electorate, according to polls, believe the nation is headed in the wrong direction, and many of them may find Mr. Trump to be a suitable messenger of their discontent.

In response to Mr. Trump’s bombast and his promise of radical but heedless change, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton offered a vision of steady, incremental progress toward goals that matter to most Americans. She chose as running mate a politician, Virginia Sen. Timothy M. Kaine, who embodies that pragmatic promise: His career of public service has combined a commitment to liberal values with an openness to bipartisan compromise. Ms. Clinton acknowledged deep-seated problems troubling many Americans — inequality and slowing social mobility, gridlock in Washington, national security threats — but her answer to them is neither the “political revolution” touted by her primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), nor the nihilism of Mr. Trump.

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-conventions-are-done-and-its-clear-what-is-at-stake-in-this-years-election/2016/07/30/74526940-55a7-11e6-88eb-7dda4e2f2aec_story.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo Editorial: The conventions are done, and it’s clear what is at stake in this year’s election (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2016 OP
Wow. WaPo actually omitted their ritual 'but Clinton is blah-blah-blah flawed too' Princess Turandot Jul 2016 #1

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
1. Wow. WaPo actually omitted their ritual 'but Clinton is blah-blah-blah flawed too'
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 10:23 AM
Jul 2016

Now that the barbarian has eaten a hole in the gate.

Her campaign is betting that Americans instead will buy into her alternative offer of competence and dedication to the task of “step-by-step, year-by-year” change. But what if the wrong-track polls reflect not just anger and frustration but also deep cynicism about the possibility of any change? If that’s the case, detailed policy proposals and testimonials to Ms. Clinton’s experience and doggedness will just bounce off many voters. The more outlandish Mr. Trump becomes — beseeching unfriendly powers to hack into American emails, for example — the more he will appeal. Hearing repeatedly from Mr. Trump and Mr. Sanders alike that the system is “rigged,” voters may conclude it might as well be blown up.

.........The risk to the nation and the world can be glimpsed in the damage already done......... And allied leaders and their populations are questioning as never before whether the United States can be relied upon. They have good reason to wonder.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WaPo Editorial: The conve...