2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo Cenk went on Stephanopoulos's show today and said Trump was going to win.
Last edited Mon Aug 1, 2016, 07:38 AM - Edit history (1)
Cenk from TYT slams Trump over and again today as he was on the panel, then at the end has Trump winning on the electoral map and says the Dems made a huge mistake nominating Hillary because it is an anti-establishment year and we picked the most establishment candidate there is.
Hey Cenk, you are out in zero-reality field on what is going to happen in November, and, at least on that point, GO SHIT IN YOUR HAT!
You are acting like a BorB guy, and it STINKS. For SHAME! (PS: And when you show debates on your online program, please SHUT UP and tell your staff to do the same. Let people watch the debates for themselves without all the bla bla bla bullshit.)
geomon666
(7,512 posts)He is a BorB guy.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Yes, he ran "anti-establishment," but it was because the rest of that electorate was so split and they don't do proportional voting over there. Trump won MANY of his primaries with PLURALITIES and not majorities.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Nobody wanted to listen to his anti-Obama bullshit for the past eight years.
He NEEDS Trump to win or his career as a victim pundit fighting "The Man" is over.
montex
(93 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)And a stupid one at that.
LuvLoogie
(7,014 posts)about 6 months.
revbones
(3,660 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)He's a social conservative who claims he's now a progressive yet he still walks and talks like a social conservative.
SheriffBob
(552 posts)he's an asshat.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Cenk was a Repub corporate lawyer making 75 K a year... Become a progressive talk show host was a good way to bank coin.
Sad
revbones
(3,660 posts)You should probably re-evaluate that post if you want any truth to it.
He left that job and stuggled to get where TYT is today.
Also, by your logic anyone that used to be a Republican is not welcome in the Democratic Party.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)As to editing my post I would literally rather die. Some of us are progressive because it's the right thing to do, not for the filthy lucre.
revbones
(3,660 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)How does this post:
fulfill the mission the Administrator has given to to this board:
We are Democrats and we are all Clinton supporters now. Our opponents are Donald Trump and the Republican Party.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/~Skinner
Thank you in advance.
Cha
(297,323 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)There is a difference between discussion and debate among those with basically similar views and goals, and an echo chamber that only allows propaganda from one narrow perspective.
I hope DU stays in the former category and does not devolve into the latter.
GreenPartyVoter
(72,378 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #53)
Post removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)sheshe2
(83,793 posts)I love and voted for Elizabeth Warren. Former Republican.
You may want to rethink your logic.
She was adored by Bernie fans then tossed under the bus when she supported Hillary.
Lol~
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)Forget the ad hominem attacks. Cenk makes many good points if you actually listen to what he said. As for his conclusion (and the similar one from Michael Moore recently), all that means is we can't get complacent and assume Hillary has it in the bag. ---> We don't need to worry about the people on the left who are saying Trump could win. We have to worry about the ones who say he can't. That's the thinking that can cost us the election.
brush
(53,792 posts)Cenk is a Bernie of Buster so I understand his bitterness and why he wants Hillary to lose, as for Moore, I don't get his reasoning at all.
He should be doing a documentary on all the crazy, outrageous quotes from Trump during the campaign that would help us Dems win instead of going around saying Trump is going to win.
Both of these two huge disappointments are wrong however. Trump is going to lose spectacularly as the era of repug candidates winning with the racist, whites only votes is long over. Both McCain and Romney had huge white vote majorities and still lost handily.
We, the Obama coalition African Americans, progressive whites, Latino Americans, Asian Americans, gays, women, Native Americans, sensible left-leaning and moderate independents who don't want Trump appointing the next 3-4 Supreme Court justices, and 80% if Bernie supporters who now are in the Hilary camp we outnumber them.
Trump is not going to win with his insults and bombast. There just aren't enough racist whites to beat us despite what Cenk and Moore claim.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)Good post at http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512323697
We have to take the risk seriously. We are complacent at our own peril.
brush
(53,792 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 1, 2016, 02:09 AM - Edit history (1)
That's a big chunk out of the white vote right there.
There just aren't enough of regular white repugs and racist whites to put Trump over the top. They are outnumbered.
And I don't buy the complacency argument.
Saying people are being complacent is just an opinion, doesn't make it so.
We will GOTV and Trump will lose.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)- also applies to your statement, "We will GOTV and Trump will lose" -- or *anybody's* prediction of what is going to happen in November (unless maybe you believe in psychics).
I do think HRC will win. But it is not a certainty, and I don't think it serves us well to get cocky about it.
brush
(53,792 posts)McCain and Romney both had huge majorities of the white vote and both lost.
The Obama coalition African Americans, progressive whites, Latino Americans, Asian Americans, gays, women, Native Americans, sensible left-leaning and moderate independents who don't want Trump appointing the next 3-4 Supreme Court justices, and 80% if Bernie supporters who now are in the Hilary camp we outnumber Trumps supporters.
The era of repugs winning with white votes only is long over. Until that party becomes something other than a white identity organization they can't win a national election. The last two presidential cycles prove that.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)You can lose the popular vote and still win the presidency.
Watch the video being discussed in this thread. At the end, all the panelists show maps of possible electoral outcomes that could favor one candidate or the other. None were entirely out of the realm of possibility.
brush
(53,792 posts)The news media wants a horse race and talk up right-leaning polls that say it's tied or even that Trump is ahead while ignoring other polls that show Hillary clearly ahead.
Don't fall for the hype.
He'll lose worst than McCain and Romney.
Everyday he's losing more voters with his attacks.
He can't help himself witness him going after not just Khan, but Khan's wife. Women voters will just love that .
He's siding with Putin, asking the Russians to hack into our politics treason or sedition, take your pick.
On a Sunday news program it came out he didn't even know Russia had already went into Ukraine and taken Crimea.
The Koch brothers are refusing to back him as they've declined to run anti-Hillary ads on his behalf. He himself doesn't have enough to self-fund as he did in the primaries.
His run is over. The American people are not crazy enough to elect this know-nothing, racist, anti-immigrant, woman insulting clown.
True Dough
(17,311 posts)I noticed the right-wing pundits had Hillary winning, except for one person who predicted an even split.
I took Uygur's forecast in the same spirit that you did, squanderer. He is serving notice that if the Dems don't get the vote out, then Trump "the anti-establishment candidate" could prevail with so many Americans fed up with the status quo and seeking change (even if Drumpf represents the worst possible example of change imaginable).
nikto
(3,284 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)and he's been cashing in the last few years....but he's not of our crew and I suspect he never was.
I always found him skirting (pardon the pun) the edges of misogyny.
He's just not very GOOD, either.
DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)When the repubs are calling you a tool because your browbeating a female, well theres something wrong.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He made an ass of himself during that incident.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)He has zero credibility any more.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)If the weather takes a turn he just slides under his rock.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Cenk Uygur: If You Don't Think Hillary Could Get Indicted, "You Are Either Grossly Ignorant Or Lying"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/04/28/cenk_uygur_if_you_dont_think_hillary_could_get_indicted_you_are_either_grossly_ignorant_or_lying.html
I slayed every clown who said she would be indicted, just slayed them!!!
OhZone
(3,212 posts)I didn't hear that one.
He's turning into that right wing hack who is ALWAYS wrong! What's his name again?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Did you see Post 6.
I don't know why we liberals allow ourselves to get played.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)that guy who can't breathe most of the time.
But I was thinking of another guy.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)brush
(53,792 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)There's a right wing hack who isn't always wrong?
kcjohn1
(751 posts)If You Don't Think Hillary Could Get Indicted
I watch him all the time. He never said Hillary would get indicted. He actually said the opposite in that its unlikely. But if you think odds of Clinton getting indicted was 0%, then you ignorant or lying..
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)As to your ad hominem attacks I wear them like a medal.
Sorry I insulted your hero though. If you want to keep him around tell him to lose one hundred pounds. He looks like he's heading for a coronary.
Lookie here
"...You got 12 FBI agents looking into you, you're getting arrested..."
-Cenk Uygur
http://tinyurl.com/gvvtbbz
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #34)
Post removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Opinion masquerading as fact Lots of investigations results in no bills. I know the results of this investigation disappoint some people but I digress. If you can provide me with documentary evidence to support your assertion I might be persuaded.
Any way little humble DemocratSinceBirth was right and the great Cenk Uygur was wrong.
revbones
(3,660 posts)He said per your own post, that she could have, not that she would.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)-Cenk Uygur
http://tinyurl.com/gvvtbbz
herding cats
(19,565 posts)This was a witch hunt where he - and every thinking person knew it was a witch hunt - yet he still tried to make it something other than that. Even though the odds were strongly against his beliefs.
People like that remind me of folks who think of the lotto as a viable retirement plan. Sure it could happen, but that doesn't mean it's likely no matter how much you wish it would happen. You're more likely to die from an asteroid strike (seriously!) than see some vague improbable reality like that come to fruition.
Now he's doubling down on his disenchantment. It's not really all that surprising to witness.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Suck a reliable source.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)I've LONG stopped watching Cenk's "Hillary-Hating" ass.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)These people are more deranged than trump supporters...shame on them
kcjohn1
(751 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Slightly paraphrasing: "The Democrats made a huge mistake picking the most establishment candidate there is in an anti-establishment year." And he said he believed Trump would win. I saw the video before I wrote my post.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)His prediction today was that Trump was going to win. Trump winning is not a radical idea. According to 538 he has 49% chance of winning.
If you watch the entire video, he spent the first 9 minutes basically trashing Trump. Your OP insinuated that he was trashing Clinton, and he was butt hurt from the primary.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The Upshot has her at 70%:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fupshot&action=click&contentCollection=upshot®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=5&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0
PEC has her at 85%:
http://election.princeton.edu/
Crystal Ball has the race leaning Democratic:
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2016-president/
as does the Cook Report:
http://cookpolitical.com/presidential/charts/scorecard
Could she lose?
Of course. This isn't professional wrestling where the winners are predetermined But the odds favor her..
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)StraightRazor
(260 posts)And you're right - he was the most anti-Trump panelist for the entire segment but apparently because he feels Hillary was a tone-deaf choice re populism in 2016, his place is under the bus.
still_one
(92,242 posts)98% of the time during the primaries
He is a reverse indicator
Cha
(297,323 posts)of being the cause of him losing his job as msnbc.
Too bad for cenk the President is at an all time high!
still_one
(92,242 posts)Tal Vez
(660 posts)I have no doubt about what he will do in November.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,832 posts)WHY aren't YOUNG TURKS VIDEOS banned from DU? Why not start alerting on every TYT videos? Some one wanted to Ban Thom Hartmen and Mike Malloy as well. I am still waiting for people to start alerting on those posts, if they are so damn bad.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,832 posts)Maybe read it again, words do make sense in proper order.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)What a pathetic bully.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)If asked for prediction on who is going to win, and I say Trump, am a bully?
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)He was a total tool to the hostess.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)who liked to bully around others in his youth. This by his own admission. In the back of his mind, he likes Trump's authoritarian style.
I don't trust him. He is unfair. He is against Hillary no matter what. His ties to the RT network make his suspect.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)for Cenk and a number of other "progressive" heroes now taking a paycheck from Putin.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)i guess being a totalitarian shill pays better
brush
(53,792 posts)Another disappointment.
Guess they are like hired guns who take pride in being able to argue any position as long as a paycheck is waiting.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)kcjohn1
(751 posts)What is your "everything points" based off?
Based on the scientific polling its 50/50. I can respect if you think Hillary will win. If I had to bet money on it now, I would probably lean towards Clinton. But I would not dismiss people who think Trump could/probably will win. This is not radical idea. Almost everything right now is pointing to coin flip election and you have people on this board living in fantasy world where the possibility of Trump winning is nil.
Charles Bukowski
(1,132 posts)have Hillary as the clear favorite.
The poll you're citing is extremely volitale. Trump is at 49% due to his convention bounce, which is all but gone now.
There's little doubt that the Young Turks (and BoBers in general) want Trump to win so they can say, "I told you so". You can deny it but it's as obvious as their #demexit hashtags. A fine bunch of progressives they are.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)In other words, Trumps bounce. That's the high water mark for him.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)brush
(53,792 posts)McCain and Romney both had huge majorities of the white vote and still lost.
That era is over.
The Obama coalition, plus the 80% of Sanders supporters who have come over to the Hillary camp, outnumber Trumps support. He will lose spectacularly to much of an ass hole, no way the majority of American voters are going to put that chump in the White House.
elleng
(130,976 posts)Thanks.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Can't wait to see all these skeptics eat a big plate of crow!
Seahawks
(11 posts)Let's not be complacent!
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Some very valid points. I agree with Greta Van Susterens last word on the matter.
Too many people are being complacent and thinking that Hillary has this locked up while crushing anybody who brings up otherwise.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Presidential races tend to be very close.
Cenk is not helpful. He's more critical of Democrats then he is of Republicans, and he personally buys into and spreads the nutso Clinton conspiracies.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)She's going to crush Don the Con, the worst candidate ever
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Republicans are not only dangerous, but a Trump victory would set civil rights, women's rights, LGBT rights, judicial rights, etc. in a precarious situation.
This is not a joking matter.
But yes, "Don the Con" is the worst candidate ever. Not only is he an embarrassing joke, too many people are feeding on his hatred.
His potential election is not a chance I'm willing to take. And I hope to hell that you are taking this seriously as well, and will vote wisely.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)She's on a roll post-convention and Debbie downers aren't helping.
She's got this
Never take anything for granted.
TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)He was mercilessly attacking Trump on every front? I agree the Trump prediction was probably sour grapes and Cenk generally comes off as mean on TV debate/panel shows, but I don't think it hurts Hillary in the least if we don't unanimously predict a Hillary landslide.
Btw, if you don't want TYT commentary during the debates watch it on CNN or whatever. People watching it on TYT are probably wanting the commentary.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)No complacency here. I'm going to work hard this election.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Before Pat Caddell went full FOX MSMBC would bring him on their show to hate Democrats from the left.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)work to get Hillary and other Democrats elected. Canvas and walk door to door...
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Nobody is actually going to buy this shit.
Everyday it gets worse. By the time they are done with that motherfucker he will lose every state.
PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)"No one in this world, so far as I knowand I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help mehas ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby. "
H L Mencken
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Watch what happens in August.
PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)I never thought Bush would get re-elected though.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)And a death is not the only event to precipitate this. Many of Hillary's 2008 supporters were quite upset at her loss and were going to sit it out as well. Obama was doomed, the pundits predicted. But they eventually came around big time. Cenk may well be representing himself, but he certainly does not speak for all of Bernie's supporters.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)However they offer no analysis to back up their predictions. Dick Morris did much the same four years ago, and it left his so-called career and credibility in ruins.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)My gawd this thread has a lot of ugly hate posts. Such handwringing bug-eyed defensiveness is usually only seen from the other side when they scream about Media Matters calling out Hannity.
Cenk is not perfect. KO is not perfect. Maher is not perfect. Even the sacred cow known as Jon Stewart I recall took grief once for not acknowledging strongly enough the false equivalency on network news.
Even dare I say, Hillary herself is not perfect
Way more often than not Cenk is in the trenches fighting for most of the same issues we all care about.
Cha
(297,323 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)montex
(93 posts)Cenk claimed back in October that Trump would be the nominee. So all you DU's hating on Cenk, remember his track record.
MADem
(135,425 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)world wide wally
(21,744 posts)betsuni
(25,544 posts)It was fun when he got really worked up over something. (Except he has a verbal tic of saying "right?" after every other sentence. Then the other panel members start to do it too, right? Then I start to do it, right?) But last year TYT started getting a Fox/RT Democrat-hate vibe and I stopped reading/watching a lot of places because it was (to me), worse than listening to Republicans, more vicious and hateful for whatever reason.
The "anti-establishment year" idea, I see it as the same Republican anti-government rhetoric as always. Individualism over society. Cynical and highly emotional at the same time. The Democratic National Convention this years was fabulous at pointing out that we are a society, and taking back patriotism was really stickin' it to the Republicans (I cringe though, every time I hear "God Bless America" and the America's-the-greatest-country-in-the-world thing, but I guess it can't be helped -- at least nobody's obsessing about flag pins or whether or not a politician touched themselves in the right place during the national anthem anymore.)
Also, I don't understand why, when someone says that Hillary Clinton will win in November, it's "complacent" but when someone says Trump will win, that's being realistic. Saying Clinton will win automatically means you won't vote? I don't get it.
emulatorloo
(44,133 posts)in her neighbourhood.
Long story short, Cenk needs to ween himself from the sugar rush he gets fron his diet of egregiously false Hillary memes.
Needs a hefty-helping of educating himself about the real HRC.
Scruffy1
(3,256 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)NNadir
(33,527 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)His theory that this is "an anti-establishment year" has some truth but that is only one aspect of what is going on.
Many in the Republican / Tea core are anti-establishment this year, but far fewer in the Democratic core are. Bernie has forced the Democratic Party to change and even Hillary to modify some of her positions.
The Democratic Party is much more unified than the Republicans.
The Democratic Party has more motivated members at large, especially for volunteering. Trump has a core that comes out to rallies, but not a heck of a lot of volunteer activity or organization.
The Democratic Party has more money.
The Democratic Party has a ground game. Trump rejects a ground game.
The Democratic Party has a widely admired sitting President campaigning for the nominee. The other side, not so much admiration, not so widely, and not so active.
The Democratic Party has a nominee who conducts herself professionally, meaning not just Presidentially, but conducts herself in a skillful self-disciplined way. Trump of course is not Presidential, unskilled, and undisciplined. He is showing signs of cracking up and may meltdown at any moment.
dsharp88
(487 posts)You know, telling us what we don't want to hear just so we'll work harder to GOTV for Hillary. If he had that much foresight, it seems to be working judging by the posts on this thread. Michael Moore is probably doing the same thing.
LostinRed
(840 posts)I use to support him and his show then he became anti-Obama and anti-democrat I stopped giving him money after that.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)("55 percent chance he wins the nomination"
Then, after Sanders lost big time -- Why Bernie Sanders Won Super Tuesday
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
/ Yeah, no. I don't think much of his prognostication
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)How many of the detractors here are working towards causing an amendment convention to overturn Citizens United? Eh? Tell us YOUR plan and efforts. I send Wolf-Pac a monthly contribution to this end. Most of you are just happy your candidate has a big Super-Pac war chest. One, of course, that there's NO strings attached thereupon. All the contributions given with only the MOST humanitarian intents one can dream up. Yeah, Cenk and crew are just a bunch of morons. I guess it qualifies me as one too since I'm a member of TYT.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Not only are you a turncoat green POS, you are a ***kin republican!
nadine_mn
(3,702 posts)One, I agree he has some butt hurt over Sanders. 2) I also agree that he makes valid points not to underestimate Trump. I think he is trying to get the other Busters to channel their own butt hurt not at protesting Hillary but to make sure Trump doesn't get elected...trying to get them to GOTV.
TYT has panels a lot, not all Cenk and there have been some extremely heated discussions between Jimmy Dore (die hard Buster who won't vote for Hillary) and Ben Mankiewicz about the reality of it not being the "lesser of two evils" and that there is no way you can say Hillary is just as bad as Trump.
All progressives who are in the "I'll write in Sanders" camp should listen ... Few people thought Trump would make it past the primaries.
He is an opinionated hot head...it is actually refreshing to hear passion sometimes instead of the false "equal time" crap the MSM does.
Many Sanders supporters are good people and damn good progressives, they worked their asses off to get Sanders so close to Clinton. Just like Clinton supporters in 2008 were upset when Obama became the nominee, and that energy and passion is needed.
Trump is an idiot. But there are a surprising amount of ill-informed, angry, racist, bigoted people who are determined to vote against their own interest, these are the same people who supported W, thought Palin was an inspiration and wanted to hang out with Joe the Plumber. You cannot reach these people with facts, all you can do is out vote them.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Geez! I'd never thought about that. What if the "fix" had been in for Obama even before the race for the nomination was begun in '07? I can see where that would've been inspirational (AND kept quiet) if that had been discovered.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)His 15 minutes will be over soon.
pansypoo53219
(20,981 posts)the media is not HELPING the dems. we have the comedians tho.
Cha
(297,323 posts)behind.
jimw81
(111 posts)He was apart of that group of ppl of Thomas Hartmann, Schultz, surandan and Robbins telling people to vote for Nader.
Cenk does make a point but part of thinks he's doing it to get ppl focus and not lazy. But what's more disturbing is that ppl at tyt are campaigning for stein and not encouraging sanders supporters to go Clinton over trump.
But Alex jones did expose his anti liberal position when cenk said to him 'I'm trying to make America better for independents and conservatives' at rnc
Yukari Yakumo
(3,013 posts)And the TYT is a shadow of its former self. It used to get views in the millions. These days, it only cracks 6 digits about half of the time, in an election year.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)He thinks everyone hates Hillary the way the BoB fanatics and the Trumpanzees do.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)predictions, I would be more concerned if he had stated that Hillary would win!
He has zero creds. Shame on the media for putting him on ANY show that wants to be taken seriously.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The do it every single election in an attempt to get viewers. Cenk has simply joined them in their garbage. Anti-Establishment my ass. Clinton took it from start to finish. He might have a point when it comes to Republicans but his need to make it bigger is based in self and padding his bank account. He knows who he is pandering to. He is sounding like H A Goodman.
Response to NCTraveler (Reply #131)
CajunBlazer This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to RBInMaine (Original post)
Post removed
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)I'm a bit with you on this one. But I will say, I saw this one when it happened. He was right that one could take things for granted in this race. It's too close to call right now. His point though about "anti-establishment" might be a bit over baked though. That's a remnant of his Bernie support. I don't think it is so much an "anti-establishment" position as it is the fairly typical "tired of the current party in power" problem. Hillary has the problem that she going to be seen as Obama's "third term". That frequently doesn't work well in American politics. The GOP's problem was that the current leadership were seen as "failures". That's two slightly different phenomenon and both can be described as "anti-establishment" but I don't really think that's what's going on. The democrats have their problems, and the GOP have their own as well. Hillary has to face the reality that she's going to be facing a certain "fatigue" with the democrats being in the White House. Any other opponent would be working that issue hard. Trump does not yet seemed to have figured that out.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Must be a NSNBC thing, right?