Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,487 posts)
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 11:59 AM Aug 2016

Noonan: The Week They Decided Donald Trump Was Crazy

Politics is about trends and tendencies. The trends for Donald Trump are not good, and he tends not to change.

All the damage done to him this week was self-inflicted. The arrows he’s taken are arrows he shot. We have in seven days witnessed his undignified and ungrateful reaction to a Gold Star family; the odd moment with the crying baby; the one-on-one interviews, which are starting to look like something he does in the grip of a compulsion, in which Mr. Trump expresses himself thoughtlessly, carelessly, on such issues as Russia, Ukraine and sexual harassment; the relitigating of his vulgar Megyn Kelly comments from a year ago; and, as his fortunes fell, his statement that he “would not be surprised” if the November election were “rigged.” Subject to an unprecedented assault by a sitting president who called him intellectually and characterologically unfit for the presidency, Mr Trump fired back—at Paul Ryan and John McCain.

The mad scatterbrained-ness of it was captured in a Washington Post interview with Philip Rucker in which five times by my count—again, the compulsion—Mr. Trump departed the meat of the interview to turn his head and stare at the television. On seeing himself on the screen: “Lot of energy. We got a lot of energy.” Minutes later: “Look at this. It’s all Trump all day long. That’s why their ratings are through the roof.” He’s all about screens, like a toddler hooked on iPad.

(snip)

Here is a truth of life. When you act as if you’re insane, people are liable to think you’re insane. That’s what happened this week. People started to become convinced he was nuts, a total flake.

(snip)

This is what became obvious, probably fatally so: Mr. Trump is not going to get serious about running for president. He does not have a second act, there are no hidden depths, there will be no “pivot.” It is not that he is willful or stubborn, though he may be, it’s that he doesn’t have the skill set needed now—discretion, carefulness, generosity, judgment. There’s a clueless quality about him. It’s not that he doesn’t get advice; it’s that he can’t hear advice, can’t process it or turn it into action.

(snip)

His supporters hope it will all turn around in the debates: He’ll wipe the floor with her; for the first time she’ll be toe-to-toe with someone who speaks truth to power. But why do they assume this? Are they watching Mrs. Clinton? She doesn’t look very afraid of him. “No, Donald, you don’t,” she purred in her acceptance speech. In debate she’ll calmly try to swat him away, cock her head, look at the moderator, smile. She’ll be watching old videos of Reagan-Carter in 1980: “There you go again.”

(snip)

Her debate approach will be this: In spite of what will no doubt be some uncomfortable moments, she will, in comparison with him, seem sturdy and grounded—normal.

More..

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-week-they-decided-he-was-crazy-1470354031

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JHB

(37,161 posts)
4. No reason to think she hasn't...
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 12:21 PM
Aug 2016

Really, what's not blindingly obvious in that column? What's there that isn't regurgitating what others have said much earlier?

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,842 posts)
5. She's built a career on cloaking horrible policy with pretentious-sounding prose.
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 01:03 PM
Aug 2016

So, yeah, this is obvious stuff but I can't imagine what compelled her to write it when she could have just sat the whole thing out.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
6. Never underestimate the need for a 'me too'...
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 01:11 PM
Aug 2016

...when there looms the prospect of veritable exile from her accustomed social circle for being on the wrong side.

Plus she has her eye on a case of Petrus Pomerol 1998, and the payment for the op-ed should cover that nicely.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
2. If you compared the debates between Hillary and Bernie, where they answered questions
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 12:09 PM
Aug 2016

on the REAL issues facing our country, not just tax cuts and terrorism, with the Republican debates which were void of any talk of policy, you know the debate outcome is pre-ordained. Trump will not be able to answer anything with substance while Hillary can intelligently discuss any issue. Trump hasn't a clue!

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
3. Fuck you, Noonan. Fucking hack.
Sat Aug 6, 2016, 12:17 PM
Aug 2016

I don't give a flying fuck what you think, even when you're saying negative shit about the Rs you've supported for decades. You're part of the problem, you overrated hack.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Noonan: The Week They Dec...