I watch especially on CNN.

"What Director Comey said UNDER OATH was that none of the 30,000 emails were properly marked as classified, and that no one - including Hillary Clinton - possesses clairvoyant abilities that would have allowed her to divine if any of them were actually classified. In addition, when under oath, Director Comey corrected the impression he had given while not under oath in his press conference that any of the emails were marked classified. He also agreed with the State Department that two of the three emails that he had implied had been classified were - in fact - improperly marked so."

And as I understand it, the &quot c)" was at the bottom of these emails, which were an accumulation of like 10-12 responses per email. And didn't the state dept. determine that they were marked with the &quot c)" erroneously? I remember someone on the committee asking Comey if he knew that the state dept. had determined that none of the 3 were actually classified, and he answered, "no" with a look of surprise on his face. Did I imagine that or did that also occur?

that there is disagreement between what she says and what, apparently, Comey says. I would have thought that at least, on MSNBC, someone would have commented.

this morning was visibly animated with excitement about some gotcha questions about that Hillary/Chris Wallace interview last weekend. Of course, no one even gets to the part that you posted.

I think I'm going to print this portion out to keep as a quick reference. This puts it all to bed. Sometime soon the campaign just needs to read this portion of the Comey questioning and leave it at that. This is just entertainment at this point.

... a report even on PBS that gives the whole story. Lisa DeJardin's was an improvement because she ended with "Did Hillary lie? We don't know." or "We don't yet know." That's a step forward from "She lied." (Domenico Montanaro). But yeah, let's report that a reasonable person could easily have missed the (c)'s, according to Comey's own opinion.