Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 01:15 AM Mar 2012

Gallup: Romney, Santorum Stir Less Enthusiasm Than McCain Did

This is just sad... for them, I mean.

PRINCETON, NJ -- A little more than one-third of Republicans say they would vote "enthusiastically" for either Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum if either candidate were to win their party's nomination for president. Slightly fewer say they would vote enthusiastically for Newt Gingrich. This level of enthusiasm is similar to Republicans' feelings about voting for Romney in early 2008, but lower than the enthusiasm level for that year's eventual GOP nominee, John McCain.

These data are from a Gallup poll conducted March 8-11, 2012. The 35% of Republicans who at this point say they would vote "enthusiastically" for Mitt Romney for president if he were to win the GOP nomination is identical to the 35% of Republicans who said the same about Romney back in late January/early February 2008.

In that same 2008 poll, however, 47% of Republicans said they would vote enthusiastically for John McCain, who ended up as that year's GOP nominee. In short, Romney's enthusiasm deficit in 2008 has carried over to his current campaign, with the difference being that none of the other nominees this year are generating any more enthusiasm among Republicans than Romney is.

Republicans are also less enthusiastic about voting for their party's current pool of candidates than Democrats were about voting for their potential nominees in both 2008 and in 2004. More than half of Democrats in 2008 said they would vote "enthusiastically" for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton if either were to win their party's presidential nomination. Forty-five percent of Democrats in late January/early February 2004 said they would vote enthusiastically for John Kerry for president.

MORE AT...
http://www.gallup.com/poll/153272/Romney-Santorum-Stir-Less-Enthusiasm-McCain.aspx

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gallup: Romney, Santorum Stir Less Enthusiasm Than McCain Did (Original Post) JaneQPublic Mar 2012 OP
At least McCain had a compelling backstory... MADem Mar 2012 #1
So true davidpdx Mar 2012 #2
Ha ha ha! MADem Mar 2012 #6
No, he was creepy. left coaster Mar 2012 #3
Yes, but he had a life before he got creepy. MADem Mar 2012 #5
This is why I think the right's hatred of Romney is going to balance their hatred of Obama. Arkana Mar 2012 #4
Is that like saying "Slime Mold Less Popular than Pond Scum"? Arugula Latte Mar 2012 #7

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. At least McCain had a compelling backstory...
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 01:25 AM
Mar 2012

Reprobate at the Academy, from a line of flag officers, wrecked three planes, acquitted himself well in the Hanoi Hilton...

He may have been an old cuss with some boneheaded ideas and a crazy running mate, but he wasn't boring and creepy. In comparison to the current GOP crew throwing down, he looks almost normal. That's really saying something, because three or four years ago, he looked as 'batshit' as they come.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. Ha ha ha!
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 02:51 PM
Mar 2012

Maybe you could! On the cigarettes, I mean: WARNING: THE SURGEON GENERAL HAS DETERMINED THAT MITT ROMNEY MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. Yes, but he had a life before he got creepy.
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 02:13 PM
Mar 2012

He only turned creepy when he realized he wasn't going to make flag officer, had "trouble at home" (owing to his philandering), got that job at OLA, and started sniffing around for a state with a vacant congressional seat and a rich daughter of a corporate bigwig.

The reason Number One will never say a bad word about him is because of the way he treated her children (adopted them--those are the "McCain boys&quot after she divorced her first, abusing husband.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
4. This is why I think the right's hatred of Romney is going to balance their hatred of Obama.
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 10:36 AM
Mar 2012

Sure, some of them will get out for him on the premise that "HE AIN'T THAT NEGROFASCIST KENYAN USURPER", but Romney's going to realize that you can't win an election without standing for something. What does he stand for? He has no core principles or values--he just goes whichever way the wind blows.

You cannot win by being the "not-" guy unless the other guy is a hateful asshole, and Obama is anything but a hateful asshole.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Gallup: Romney, Santorum ...