many bongs has he been drinking from???


.

I have this image of Bob Woodward reeling around a college dorm room.....

Piffle on you, sir. Piffle on you.

Is that not reserved for the exclusive use of the GOP?

Because he's from that generation, and it shows. While a great portion of people "of a certain age" have grown out of such misogyny, Woodward, it would appear, remains.

http://crooksandliars.com/cltv/2016/02/woodward-complains-about-clintons

Wanna really have your head spin? Check out MediaMatters collection of sexist attacks on her from 2008
http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/02/05/a-comprehensive-guide-to-sexist-attacks-on-hill/199700

What an utterly ridiculous thing to say. He's been resting on his Watergate laurels for 40 years and it's time to hang it up. He's like a singer who was a one-hit wonder back in the day, but can't come up with anything else.

Pathetic.

Oh, give me a break!

Idiotic argument. Sorry, Woodward. Better think of another excuse.

don't you understand, you syphilitic has been.

Trump is so over the top batshit crazy, Hillary's allies are actually toning it down.

No, really. Trump just called for the assignation of Hillary and Woodward is talking about the over the top rhetoric of Hillary's allies??!?!?!! WTF is wrong with you Bob Woodward?!?!!

You were the undisputed king of investigative journalists--one of the people responsible for taking down the Nixon administration.

What, is this a ham-handed attempt to return to your glory days?

I almost hope that some young actor/actress in Hollywood makes an accurately disparaging remark against him just to PROVE it!

"Your acting was boring and you'll never amount to anything."

... poor Donald had no choice but to call Obama "literally the founder of Isis".

WTF Woodword...you are sadly and totally losing it.

be a whining bore.

He's a straight up lunatic.

His commentary has seemed off for at least the last 8-16 years.

Compare these two things:

1. His book https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_of_Attack and its contention, "that President Bush planned from early in his presidency to remove Saddam Hussein from power by force, rather than making any serious effort to use diplomacy or other means." with...

2. This article: http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2015/05/26/bob-woodward-bush-didnt-lie-to-start-iraq-war "An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."
According to Woodward, Bush himself was skeptical about the presence of weapons of mass destruction and urged caution on then-CIA Director George Tenet lest he stretch the case that there were."
------------------------------

Something is wrong with someone who posits both of those things. #1 shows that Bush wanted to go to war and was pretending to try to use diplomacy. #2 Gives the opposite impression.

Then of course if you factor in the Weapons Inspectors reports 11 days before we went to war that showed there were no WMD in Iraq, Woodwards #2 really looks silly.

Quit trying to relive your glory days. Watergate's over and no one takes you seriously any more.

Like Eastwood, stop talking. Try to salvage your legacy instead of destroying it by continuing to talk.

Rhetoric is responsible for demagoguery.. that's a winner.

Woodward should work for the National Enqirer.

... In recent years after writing some early puff piece books about Dubya. He is way past his prime.