Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 09:27 PM Aug 2016

George Shultz, Condoleezza Rice conspicuously silent on Trump

Shultz praised Romney at a May 2012 fundraiser at the 95-room Chateau Carolands in Hillsborough, where guests paid from $2,500 to $50,000 to attend. Who else was at Chateau that day? Rice. For her, endorsing Romney was about expressing not only her values but the country’s values.

“We have to defend the country, not just from (a position of) strength and power, but from a sense of values of who we are,” Rice said that day. “Friends, who just want to know that when the chips are down, we are going to be there for them ... and that indeed we know the difference between friend and foe.”

“The president of the United States has to understand that the American people have a view,” Rice said, “and that our leadership cannot be (reduced to) the lowest common denominator positions.”

So given Rice’s silence on Trump, we can assume that she doesn’t think Trump has taken any “lowest common denominator positions.” And that they share the same “sense of values of who we are.”

http://www.sfchronicle.com/nation/article/George-Shultz-Condoleezza-Rice-conspicuously-9142089.php

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George Shultz, Condoleezza Rice conspicuously silent on Trump (Original Post) onehandle Aug 2016 OP
Shultz on Trump “God help us” Jarqui Aug 2016 #1
Ah. That leaves Kindasleezsy as the worst Secretary of State in history. nt onehandle Aug 2016 #2
Um, Kissinger? nt geek tragedy Aug 2016 #3
He was an effective megalomaniac. Rice was feckless and accomplished nothing. onehandle Aug 2016 #5
Her record is pretty tough to compete with ... Jarqui Aug 2016 #4
In a just society, Condi would have been shamed into silence n/t hibbing Aug 2016 #6
Money trumps principle... Orsino Aug 2016 #7

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. He was an effective megalomaniac. Rice was feckless and accomplished nothing.
Mon Aug 15, 2016, 10:22 PM
Aug 2016

Except for lining her own pockets.

Kissinger may not have been our cup of tea, but he was proactive in his promotion of destruction.

Rice was way out of her league, and was simply rewarded with the position for being a bumbling idiot that did not prevent 9/11.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»George Shultz, Condoleezz...