Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 12:51 PM Mar 2012

TED STEVENS: Congress reacts to prosecutorial misconduct findings

Meanwhile, Don Siegelman and the corrupt Bush USAs do not get a whisper from the 'Obama' DoJ

==============
Congress reacts to prosecutorial misconduct findings
Defense would have to be told immediately of any favorable evidence.
By SEAN COCKERHAM Anchorage Daily News March 15th, 2012 http://www.adn.com/2012/03/15/2373342/congress-reacts-to-prosecutorial.html


WASHINGTON -- Congress is moving on the findings of prosecutorial misconduct in the Ted Stevens case, with Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski introducing a bill and the Senate Judiciary Committee planning a hearing on what happened. .......

Murkowski told reporters Thursday that the Justice Department did nothing while its prosecutors went over the line ...

Alaska Democratic Sen. Mark Begich, who beat Stevens in the 2008 election shortly after his conviction, is signing on as a co-sponsor.

"This legislation will help level the playing field and ensure citizens of any stature are treated fairly and given the opportunity to confront the evidence against them," he said........

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TED STEVENS: Congress reacts to prosecutorial misconduct findings (Original Post) L. Coyote Mar 2012 OP
Judges Make All the Difference in Federal Corruption Trials L. Coyote Mar 2012 #1
Prosecutors need to be held accountable. LiberalFighter Mar 2012 #2

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
1. Judges Make All the Difference in Federal Corruption Trials
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 12:55 PM
Mar 2012

By Roger Shuler March 14, 2012
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Judges-Make-All-the-Differ-by-Roger-Shuler-120314-512.html

.........

Comparing two criminal trials is tricky because they often come with multiple variables, including different defendants, different prosecutors, different defense lawyers, and different jurors. But the most important difference in the Siegelman and McGregor cases was the most obvious: They had different judges.

Siegelman and Scrushy had the misfortune to draw U.S. District Judge Mark Fuller, a George W. Bush appointee who had been on the federal bench for less than four years at the time of trial. McGregor and his codefendants had the good fortune to draw U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson, a Jimmy Carter appointee who has served on the bench for almost 32 years.
The experience factor is not the biggest difference between Fuller and Thompson. I have been around judges enough to know that an inexperienced judge can be every bit as fair and competent as a veteran judge. The key factor is not experience, but ethics (and respect for the law). Thompson has a huge edge over Fuller in both of those critical areas--and that's the No. 1 reason McGregor and Co. were acquitted while Siegelman and Scrushy still are battling to overturn their unlawful convictions. .......

.......

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»TED STEVENS: Congress re...