Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 12:32 PM Aug 2016

If your only source for negative news about Hillary Clinton is Washington Times,

please don't post it here on DU. That is not a reliable source. If you can't find a better source, there's no point in posting it at all. Right-wing sources alone are not enough. We don't need to see Washington Times stories here that are negative about our candidate.

Thanks!

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If your only source for negative news about Hillary Clinton is Washington Times, (Original Post) MineralMan Aug 2016 OP
What? You don't think the Moonies make good reporters? Squinch Aug 2016 #1
Just Plain Ridiculous that some people would purport to be progressives geek tragedy Aug 2016 #2
Where? Kingofalldems Aug 2016 #3
Indeed. MineralMan Aug 2016 #4
Ha! Maven Aug 2016 #5
Ha!! :-D NurseJackie Aug 2016 #8
The Moonie Times not a good source? workinclasszero Aug 2016 #6
It's an excellent source...to ignore. MineralMan Aug 2016 #7
Its funny how easy it is to fool people workinclasszero Aug 2016 #9
Yes, exactly. The name of a source is no indication of its quality. MineralMan Aug 2016 #10
Wait Zo Zig Aug 2016 #11

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
1. What? You don't think the Moonies make good reporters?
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:14 PM
Aug 2016

You aren't letting me trash Hillary! You neo-liberals are violating my first amendment rights! No one can say anything here anymore!

... and so on...

How's my impersonation?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. Just Plain Ridiculous that some people would purport to be progressives
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:17 PM
Aug 2016

while pimping stuff from the Moonie Times and Breitbart

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
4. Indeed.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:24 PM
Aug 2016

I just visited another website, vaguely related to DU, and discovered that it considers Alex Jones sites and 4chan.org to be sources worth posting from. It's full of original posts sourced from sites no self-respecting DUer would ever use as sources.

People at that site are taking such useless websites seriously. How could anyone take a site seriously that is full of material from wackadoo sources?


DU should be a website where people post from reliable, trusted sources that do not have a right wing or other weird agenda. That's how I feel, anyhow.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
7. It's an excellent source...to ignore.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:41 PM
Aug 2016

I'd alert on posts that are sourced there, but too many DUers are not aware of its heavily biased approach. Such alerts consistently fail to get posts with that lousy excuse for a news source as the link.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
9. Its funny how easy it is to fool people
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:51 PM
Aug 2016

with just a name.

The Moonie Times is a right wing cult organ but the Washington Times sound like a proper newspaper.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
10. Yes, exactly. The name of a source is no indication of its quality.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 02:01 PM
Aug 2016

There are tons of websites with names that sound like actual news publications, even though they are little more than personal blogs by someone who is posting nonsense.

The same thing applies to nutcase advocacy websites that pretend to be scientific publications. A site named The International Journal of Nutrition, for example, might well be a website created by some food faddist. It sounds like a scientific journal's title, but the content may be bullshit.

The Internet is a wonderful thing, since anyone can publish their thinking without spending money or making it past an editorial board. Still, it's up to us, as individuals, to assess Internet sources before relying on them. In many ways, the Internet is a mixed blessing. While it makes finding information incredibly easy, it also makes disseminating misinformation just as easy.

Critical thinking is more needed today than ever before. It must be applied to every new source we encounter, or we risk quoting nonsense as though it were truth.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If your only source for n...