2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSiwsan
(26,262 posts)Rachel is doing a good job, but I'm pretty stunned.
Mike Nelson
(9,954 posts)...spinning for dollars. She better get the money from The Donald up front.
Siwsan
(26,262 posts)And she hides her inexperience by fast talking yammering. If I was interviewing her, I'd likely have let loose with a number of expletive deleted, by now.
chillfactor
(7,575 posts)and her fake smile is as irritating as her voice.
Seen her on Bill Maher a few times. Then I heard all these things about how awesome she is. I figured maybe she had a lobotomy since the last time I saw her. Turns out.....not so much.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)I was familiar w her from watching Maher, and while not surprised have been banging my head over all this "she is so sweet" bullshit.
Prototype fantastical positive spin that a Republican gets. She is nasty piece of work.
skylucy
(3,739 posts)hour of Rachel letting KellyAnn answer powder puff questions and occasionally getting away with slamming Hillary with nasty right wing talking points. Rachel needs to let Hillary's campaign person have one hour to do the same. Excuse me while I
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)RapSoDee
(421 posts)she got all gooey and let yet another Republican liar slither away...
spartan61
(2,091 posts)after about 32 seconds of Kelly Anne. Awwww, the sweet sound of silence.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)She gives such obtuse arguments that the others just go huh until their head hurts and they have to stop
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)the whole thing. It was my first time listening to Kellyanne Conway, and she seems to have a warm and affable personality initially, and is a step up from listening to a campaign speech from her boss, but that's not saying much. When KC kept getting grilled during the interview, she unsurprisingly tried to turn it around with attacks on Hillary Clinton. There was one point where she said that HC needs to "get out more because that's what the voters want". Apparently, HC seems to be talking enough and getting out on the campaign trail enough while maintaining leads in every swing state, and we haven't even reached the debates yet. Why should her campaign take advice from a campaign that is losing against her? That's exactly what Mr. Caterpillar Hair's camp wants her to do, though: talk enough to where she puts her foot in her mouth. Everyone (well, at least anyone who has a brain and has been paying attention) knows that TV and online media are typically quick to dissect (and sometimes twist) HC's words and desperately scavenge for any perceived flaws. Because of that, there is little room for error with her. Keep doing what works.
duncang
(1,907 posts)suggestion on how the Clinton campaign should be run was pretty stupid. Con-way saying she should do this so we may have a chance of catching up. Only something that could come from a con campaign.