What a tool. And if this doesn't expose the entire wikileaks project as a russian tool and completely undermine their supposed mission I don't know what would.

as exactly what you say.

Last week, we learned something else: The Russians aren’t just hackers — they’re also hacks. Turns out that before leaking their stolen information, they are in some cases doctoring the documents, making edits that add false information and then passing the documents off as the originals.

Foreign Policy’s Elias Groll reported last week that the hackers goofed: They posted both the original versions of at least three documents and their edited versions. These documents, stolen from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, were altered by the hackers to create the false impression that Russian anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny was funded by Soros. A pro-Russian hacking group, CyberBerkut, had inserted Navalny’s name, bogus dollar amounts and fabricated wording.

This raises an intriguing possibility: Are Vladimir Putin’s operatives planning to dump edited DNC documents on the eve of the presidential election?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-putin-sponsored-october-surprise/2016/08/29/d7f21d16-6e33-11e6-9705-23e51a2f424d_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.3f7cb5df8528

Remind me why he has a vendetta against HRC?

Trump has also promised Putin Eastern Europe.

Edited documents already discovered to be tainted by Russians, and say anything coming from the Putin camp is going to be doctored, and when did Americans put an ounce of belief in anything a vicious dictator had his hands in?

Just like the maggot.

in a way that looks plausible.

There have already been leaked emails that were proved to have been altered. Why should we trust any further leaks?

"Altered Clinton emails could be released by Russian Operatives Next Week"

as he tries to claim he is and big on the Truth - he would simply dump the raw data.

We generally disregard the ferret rapist and would love to see him tried in Sweden asap. He has zero credibility. Surely that can be shown in the US as well?

prove a negative which takes a lot of time. Perhaps why he is withholding - to shorten the window before the election to disprove anything.

Welcome from afar to DU !!

In the UK as he has no credibility he just wouldn't be listened to. Every time we see him talk....which isn't often we just think about him holed up without bit d in the embassy

Wouldn't an attack on credibility be the best thing. Brexit has taught me playing their game is the only way

It is now obvious that wikileaks is now a front operation for Russian intelligence services.

Assange should be focused on....by someone...and pulled through the mire for being a rapist and Russian puppet

Don't under estimate these people. In the UK for the leave campaign they spread their bile in all the forums and social media. Parenting sites, women's sites anywhere that has a politics or news section. Then after the vote the posters went puff into smoke

It is genearly gossip ed about that we have Russian plants in our social media

There I fixed it.

I have never been a fan of his. I don't think he has done any nation any favors and has sucked some really naive people into his orbit through the utter bs he puts out there.

He doesn't actually have anything of substance, because there's nothing of substance to have.

You can't be even sure they were not altered or fabricated by his Russian buddies...Assange is a tool of Putin and has lost all credibility.

He's nothing more than Putin's tool.

because he already lost the right to pretend he has anyone's best interest in mind except his own.