Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*****BREAKING***** Washington Post/ABC A + Rated National Poll Clinton 51 - Deplorable 43 (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 OP
Wowza vadermike Sep 2016 #1
nt SCliberal91294 Sep 2016 #2
But - but - but - OhZone Sep 2016 #3
Try as they might... Democrats Ascendant Sep 2016 #6
Slipping deplorably in the polls.. misterhighwasted Sep 2016 #4
That's what they're gonna say... LakeArenal Sep 2016 #60
Well vadermike Sep 2016 #5
Exactly! Democrats Ascendant Sep 2016 #7
And vadermike Sep 2016 #8
'National' poll elleng Sep 2016 #9
And Morning Consult's 50 state poll had results in line with this. n/t pnwmom Sep 2016 #14
We have an Electoral College but a candidate winning the popular vote by eight percentage points... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 #18
If she gets over 50%, there's no way Drumpf can win. longship Sep 2016 #38
National vadermike Sep 2016 #10
A Freaking Plus at 538 DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 #13
Above 50% is very, very good. tinrobot Sep 2016 #11
Way better than I expected. Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #12
My e- buddy figured out the URL DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2016 #19
The trend is good in this one. +4, +7, +8 over 4 weeks Dem2 Sep 2016 #15
And vadermike Sep 2016 #16
21.5% are deplorable bluestateguy Sep 2016 #17
And that is with Dem enthusiasm depressed due to non-stop media geek tragedy Sep 2016 #20
Hillary is firing up enthusiasm by engaging and beginning to own the news cycle with "deplorable". Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #31
Yes Johnny2X2X Sep 2016 #34
That just makes me angry MFM008 Sep 2016 #43
LOL still_one Sep 2016 #21
I needed to hear this bmstee01 Sep 2016 #22
Welcome to DU, bmstee01! calimary Sep 2016 #53
I winder vadermike Sep 2016 #23
RCP Johnny2X2X Sep 2016 #24
The methodology concerns me.. SCliberal91294 Sep 2016 #25
Sigh Johnny2X2X Sep 2016 #26
There are more Dems than Republicans in the country. RandySF Sep 2016 #27
I know, SCliberal91294 Sep 2016 #28
Nope Johnny2X2X Sep 2016 #29
True, SCliberal91294 Sep 2016 #30
Random Johnny2X2X Sep 2016 #32
Actually this would be a stratified random sample Persondem Sep 2016 #55
question is, what turnout model(s) did they report 0rganism Sep 2016 #33
The polls are biased right Johnny2X2X Sep 2016 #35
there are a couple reasons for that, i think 0rganism Sep 2016 #54
It concerns you because Clinton is ahead? Democat Sep 2016 #40
Welcome to DU, concerned one molova Sep 2016 #41
Party ID is fluid Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #46
And Trump's honest/trustworthy number is 4 points LOWER than Hillary's bluestateguy Sep 2016 #36
Teflon works both ways I see. ffr Sep 2016 #37
I would suggest only one per week. world wide wally Sep 2016 #39
Deplorable Donald murielm99 Sep 2016 #42
yep ... napkinz Sep 2016 #50
K&R livetohike Sep 2016 #44
That might stop my hyperventilation . . . for today. Vinca Sep 2016 #45
I wonder if the reasonable 3rd party supporters will start moving mcar Sep 2016 #47
Go tweet that Donald! Nt helpisontheway Sep 2016 #48
Clinton net advantage over Trump on issues: economy +4, terrorism +3, immigration +2, taxes +9, trad riversedge Sep 2016 #49
Tuck Frump!!!!! workinclasszero Sep 2016 #51
Oh dear Uponthegears Sep 2016 #52
And even THESE numbers are closer than they'll be in November! TonyPDX Sep 2016 #56
As the election nears, third party candidates numbers soften. alfredo Sep 2016 #58
In a fucking landslide! Take that deplorable et al lonestarnot Sep 2016 #57
Hillary may have tagged him for the Ages bucolic_frolic Sep 2016 #59
Why the frack is it only 8 points?? Beartracks Sep 2016 #61
Man, Deplorable just can't get above 45% for love or money. Awwwwwwww catbyte Sep 2016 #62
Yes shenmue Sep 2016 #63
"Deplorable" SusanCalvin Sep 2016 #64

vadermike

(1,417 posts)
5. Well
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:03 AM
Sep 2016

Now the narrative is going to shift again till the debates Hillary campaign going into high gear not backing down They must see her internals Looks like 3rd party's decreasing People are horrified of the Putin thing too looks like

vadermike

(1,417 posts)
8. And
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:05 AM
Sep 2016

If the trumpets go after Hillary tmmrw they fuck themselves people won't put up with it Its sept 11 and u think people getting tired of the shit That goes for Hillarys campaign too which I think she will respect Trump won't be able to help himself I think tmmrw

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,714 posts)
18. We have an Electoral College but a candidate winning the popular vote by eight percentage points...
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:34 AM
Sep 2016

We have an Electoral College but a candidate winning the popular vote by eight percentage points is very likely on his or her way to an Electoral College landslide.

longship

(40,416 posts)
38. If she gets over 50%, there's no way Drumpf can win.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:34 AM
Sep 2016

It won't even be close.

So sometimes national polls say something meaningful.

That would be true of this one.

vadermike

(1,417 posts)
10. National
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:08 AM
Sep 2016

Is a good indicator She is still up in majority of states she needs not just blue states WAPO is pretty good

vadermike

(1,417 posts)
16. And
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:27 AM
Sep 2016

That's when they threw everything at her emails emails , coughing bullshit this bullshit that and she's ahead and gaining They have no idea that trump is fucking them Good

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
20. And that is with Dem enthusiasm depressed due to non-stop media
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:48 AM
Sep 2016

feeding frenzies over emails and the Clinton foundation.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,045 posts)
31. Hillary is firing up enthusiasm by engaging and beginning to own the news cycle with "deplorable".
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:09 AM
Sep 2016

Trump is being Trumped with his own technique. He's an entertainer and that is all he's got, trying to dominate the news cycle.

Johnny2X2X

(19,116 posts)
34. Yes
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:24 AM
Sep 2016

Last edited Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:33 AM - Edit history (1)

And the difference might be is that Trump just flies off and says something outrageous that hurts him, this struck me as calculated. Not in a bad way, but it would not surprise me if Hillary's team planned the statement, the aftermath, and the non apology that allowed her to stick to her guns and still look congenial. It was well played. Contrasted to Trump's regular outbursts and it was quite thought provoking and well crafted.

calimary

(81,501 posts)
53. Welcome to DU, bmstee01!
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:50 PM
Sep 2016

Remember - it's "D" for Donald, AND "D" for Deplorables! See how it all fits? The "D" is the thing! Grades him on the most favorable curve possible and he STILL gets a "D"!

vadermike

(1,417 posts)
23. I winder
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:52 AM
Sep 2016

What the effect of today's brouhaha will have on it I'm glad Hilary's team is not backing down on pointing out racism etc I'm nt not gonna get too worried about it Hillarys team must be confident with their internals

Johnny2X2X

(19,116 posts)
24. RCP
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:54 AM
Sep 2016

Now watch, RCP will take a few days to add this to their average and then they'll remove it as soon as possible after. RCP is right wing and their methods are suspect. The lone poll that showed Trump ahead will spend 3 weeks in their average while this one will spend less than a week. Watch.

SCliberal91294

(170 posts)
25. The methodology concerns me..
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 12:59 AM
Sep 2016

It sample 10% more dems than Republicans. This should cancel out that CNN poll at least

SCliberal91294

(170 posts)
28. I know,
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:05 AM
Sep 2016

Shouldn't it be more like 34% dems and 28% republicans? Obviously we would still be winning, but maybe subtract 1-2 points.

SCliberal91294

(170 posts)
30. True,
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:09 AM
Sep 2016

Obviously the CNN poll was way off. At a very minimum it should have had Hillary up 2 in LV and up 5 in RV.

Johnny2X2X

(19,116 posts)
32. Random
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:17 AM
Sep 2016

It's called random sampling for a reason. You don't pick a sample and then start throwing away parts of it because it doesn't match what you expected(they do throw out some for other reasons). And pollsters aren't asking people their party affiliation before they start the poll. +10 Dem is what they reported, +10 is within reason. This is the best pollster out there, if someone asked me what the Dem-Rep ratio is in this country I would say a recent ABC-WAPO poll put it at plus 10 Dem and that would likely be the latest and most accurate number we have.

Again, this is just one new data point, just like other polls, but this one means slightly more because it's from the strongest rated pollster. Hillary could reopen a decent lead, but Trump will likely find a way to close the gap again. Hillary has been in the eye of the country a lot more recent though and she's leading a strong campaign. She's a solid favorite to win.

Persondem

(1,936 posts)
55. Actually this would be a stratified random sample
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 03:17 PM
Sep 2016

"A stratified random sample is a population sample that requires the population to be divided into smaller groups, called 'strata'. "

So if you know your total sample size will be say 500 voters then based on demographics you try to match the sample's characteristics to the population as a whole. So if 34% of voters are D's then you stop taking data on D's when you get 500 x .34 = 170 D's contacted. Rinse and repeat for other categories.

0rganism

(23,970 posts)
33. question is, what turnout model(s) did they report
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:22 AM
Sep 2016

previous poster is correct in that there really are more self-identified Democrats than Republicans. however, this has always been a problem for pollsters using random sampling - sometimes you get too much of a demo, sometimes too little. so in the case of an election poll the results of each demo get weighted to match a turnout model. to a certain extent this immunizes the poll to demographic inconsistency, but it does introduce a few other problems (e.g., accuracy of the turnout model). sometimes pollsters compensate for this by reporting several turnout models to adjust their sample, and sometimes the news picks up on the results of one such model to support a given narrative.

for instance the turnout model for the recent CNN poll that had people here shitting bricks included the highest proportional turnout for white voters in decades. it will be interesting to look at the turnout model used in this poll by way of comparison.

Johnny2X2X

(19,116 posts)
35. The polls are biased right
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 01:27 AM
Sep 2016

Look at the last two GEs, almost every poll had Romney closer to Obama, basically only 1 or 2 out of a few dozens of polls were slightly biased left, the rest all were biased right.

We'll see this week, but it I suspect we'll see a slight widening again.

0rganism

(23,970 posts)
54. there are a couple reasons for that, i think
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 02:49 PM
Sep 2016

first, iirc, many polls use a demographic "likely voter" model that overweights voters who align more to GOP these days - white, elderly - and discounts minority votes. so we see Clinton ahead 10 points using a "registered voter" model, and then that lead drops to 5 points using the "likely voter" screens. there's probably a more accurate middle ground with Clinton up 7 or 8 now.

then that "likely voter" model gets reinforced every couple years during the off-year elections where a lot of Democrats somehow decide there's something more worthwhile to do than voting.

and the mass media, bless their stony little hearts, has long since opted for a "horse race" narrative as the most profitable source of advertising revenue so they'll tend to select poll results where the turnout model has been used to boost the major underdog(s). even when multiple turnout models are presented, they'll only report on the one most favorable to the pre-established big picture.

over the last year, the worst effect of this has been a normalization of racism and bigotry through an editorial slant that promotes false equivalency: "see? the two parties are still the same, it's just the other side of a fair coin." when one of the parties has gone full-on sithlord, false equivalency is poison for democracy.

 

molova

(543 posts)
41. Welcome to DU, concerned one
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 04:05 AM
Sep 2016

How do you know that there are not 10% more Dems than Republicans in the nation?

world wide wally

(21,755 posts)
39. I would suggest only one per week.
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 03:40 AM
Sep 2016

She doesn't need to get into a pissing contest with Dipshit Donald, but a cold slap in the face now and then is just what the doctor ordered.

murielm99

(30,765 posts)
42. Deplorable Donald
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 05:49 AM
Sep 2016

That is his name now, since he calls her Crooked Hillary. She doesn't need to say anything. We will say it for her.

riversedge

(70,306 posts)
49. Clinton net advantage over Trump on issues: economy +4, terrorism +3, immigration +2, taxes +9, trad
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 10:53 AM
Sep 2016





TWEETS
John Harwood Verified account
?@JohnJHarwood

Post/ABC Poll, Clinton net advantage over Trump on issues: economy +4, terrorism +3, immigration +2, taxes +9, trade +16

7:47 AM - 11 Sep 2016
48 retweets 68 likes


Reply to @JohnJHarwood



VetsForObama ?@VetsForObama 2h2 hours ago

@JohnJHarwood Shorter version: @HillaryClinton is better at everything related to being President
0 retweets 2 likes

Ken Buddha ?@jwellingtonpeev 2h2 hours ago

@JohnJHarwood Poll: Clinton, Trump tied in 4 battleground states http://politi.co/2cAV0hU | Getty
0 retweets 1 like
ESQUELETO ?@ES_QUEL_ETO_ 1h1 hour ago

. @JohnJHarwood Thanks for pointing out that this poll is faulty. It's clear by those results this poll is completely wrong.Great reporting!
0 retweets 0 likes
Gadiri Diallo ?@gadiri28 2h2 hours ago

@JohnJHarwood Trade +16? Impossible...take this shady poll and dump it in the trash where it belongs!
0 retweets 0 likes
Macro Insight Group ?@macroinsightgrp 2h2 hours ago

@JohnJHarwood Trump doing a better job lately of making this a referendum about HRC, not himself.
0 retweets 0 likes
BS400 ?@blacksmith400 2h2 hours ago

@JohnJHarwood In my white/educated neighborhood folks have started to put up Trump/Pence yard signs. I would say 5% reluctant to say.
0 retweets 0 likes
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
52. Oh dear
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 11:05 AM
Sep 2016

and I so wanted to spend today on some serious hand-wringing.

Thanks for ruining everything.

(Actually, just thanks . . . even though I imagine there are some who really will be disappointed).

bucolic_frolic

(43,302 posts)
59. Hillary may have tagged him for the Ages
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 05:48 PM
Sep 2016

The Old Pretender
Old Hickory
Tippecanoe and Tyler Too
Old Kinderhook (Martin van Buren, and the origin of the term OK)
Tricky Dicky

How about

Old Deplorable?

Beartracks

(12,821 posts)
61. Why the frack is it only 8 points??
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 07:29 PM
Sep 2016

Is that solid? Comfortable?

I'd rather see it be more like 15-20!

Honestly, how do Trump supporters sleep at night? What fantasies must they tell themselves?

====================

catbyte

(34,455 posts)
62. Man, Deplorable just can't get above 45% for love or money. Awwwwwwww
Sun Sep 11, 2016, 08:02 PM
Sep 2016

Little Donny haz a sad. Especially after tape of his despicable comments on 9/11 were aired. Even in the middle of a national crisis, Don the Con managed to make it all about him.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»*****BREAKING***** Washin...