2016 Postmortem

CK_John

(10,005 posts) Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:37 PM Sep 2016

By 2024 we will need to drop the natural born citizen and allow those with 21yr residence

in the US, along with citizenship and 35 yr of age to be allowed to run for President.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

By 2024 we will need to drop the natural born citizen and allow those with 21yr residence (Original Post) CK_John Sep 2016 OP

why? niyad Sep 2016 #1

Because jberryhill Sep 2016 #3

In order to have some sort of plan for making the millions of people alreadyi CK_John Sep 2016 #6

By January? Or later in the year? jberryhill Sep 2016 #2

Yep. Eight years (and a Constitutional Amendment). That's all it'll take . . . Journeyman Sep 2016 #4

please provide us with some reasons for amending the constitution like this niyad Sep 2016 #5

See 6 and it also will be demanded by the 16 million new citizens. CK_John Sep 2016 #8

Seems the OP posted about one issue and is DURHAM D Sep 2016 #9

certainly sounds that way to me. niyad Sep 2016 #18

Your predictions are ridiculous and ignorant alcibiades_mystery Sep 2016 #7

You must be the smartest person in the world who knows what is going to happen CK_John Sep 2016 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author kestrel91316 Sep 2016 #11

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #12

Don't you get tired of being so negative? CK_John Sep 2016 #13

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2016 #14

Great. So now Arn-nuld could be president. bigwillq Sep 2016 #15

Or the former Gov of Michigan. CK_John Sep 2016 #16

and Putin's operative who is one of DURHAM D Sep 2016 #17

Yesterday you were wanting to decrease the range of people eligible to run for President. NCTraveler Sep 2016 #19

I'd like to limit the age to 35 -55, for 1 term of 6yrs, and add those who came CK_John Sep 2016 #20

Now you are back to more stringent limitations. NCTraveler Sep 2016 #21

If you want to run it's time to get started before it gets changed. CK_John Sep 2016 #23

If it gets us "President Jennifer Granholm", I'm all for it. n/t GoCubsGo Sep 2016 #22

niyad

(113,343 posts)

1. why?

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:45 PM

Sep 2016

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

3. Because

Reply to niyad (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:50 PM

Sep 2016

CK_John

(10,005 posts)

6. In order to have some sort of plan for making the millions of people alreadyi

Reply to niyad (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:57 PM

Sep 2016

here without papers legal some benefits will be needed.

Also the mass migration around the globe without any real papers will make background checks just too much work to even try.

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

2. By January? Or later in the year?

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:49 PM

Sep 2016

Journeyman

(15,036 posts)

4. Yep. Eight years (and a Constitutional Amendment). That's all it'll take . . .

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:50 PM

Sep 2016

niyad

(113,343 posts)

5. please provide us with some reasons for amending the constitution like this

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:51 PM

Sep 2016

CK_John

(10,005 posts)

8. See 6 and it also will be demanded by the 16 million new citizens.

Reply to niyad (Reply #5)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:02 PM

Sep 2016

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)

9. Seems the OP posted about one issue and is

Reply to niyad (Reply #5)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:08 PM

Sep 2016

then posting about another?

niyad

(113,343 posts)

18. certainly sounds that way to me.

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #9)

Fri Sep 16, 2016, 12:06 PM

Sep 2016

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)

7. Your predictions are ridiculous and ignorant

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:00 PM

Sep 2016

CK_John

(10,005 posts)

10. You must be the smartest person in the world who knows what is going to happen

Reply to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #7)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:10 PM

Sep 2016

in 2024. It's is my opinion.

If my OP annoy you so much that you must insult me, please put me on ignore.

Response to CK_John (Original post)

kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.

Response to CK_John (Original post)

Post removed

CK_John

(10,005 posts)

13. Don't you get tired of being so negative?

Reply to Post removed (Reply #12)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:34 PM

Sep 2016

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)

14. BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Reply to CK_John (Reply #13)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:47 PM

Sep 2016

Calling ME negative after posting this shite!!!!

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)

15. Great. So now Arn-nuld could be president.

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:50 PM

Sep 2016

CK_John

(10,005 posts)

16. Or the former Gov of Michigan.

Reply to bigwillq (Reply #15)

Fri Sep 16, 2016, 12:04 AM

Sep 2016

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)

17. and Putin's operative who is one of

Reply to CK_John (Reply #16)

Fri Sep 16, 2016, 12:42 AM

Sep 2016

Trump's top surrogates

Boris Epshteyn

- http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-surrogate-on-cnn-russia-did-not-seize-crimea/

Great...a KGBer as our President.

NO THANKS

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

19. Yesterday you were wanting to decrease the range of people eligible to run for President.

Reply to CK_John (Original post)

Fri Sep 16, 2016, 12:07 PM

Sep 2016

Today you are saying you want it increased.

WTF?

Opposing positions on back to back days.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)

20. I'd like to limit the age to 35 -55, for 1 term of 6yrs, and add those who came

Reply to NCTraveler (Reply #19)

Fri Sep 16, 2016, 01:11 PM

Sep 2016

into the country, who are citizens who have 21 yrs of residence along with natural born citizen.

These would require 3 changes to the constitution and would also need a base who wants them.

So I'm giving my support.