2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe @nyTimes' mincing coverage of this campaign has left me turning, more & more to the Post, which
Nicole Merchut Retweeted
Matt Brennan ?@thefilmgoer 42m42 minutes ago
Matt Brennan Retweeted Joshua Chaffee
The Times' mincing coverage of this campaign has left me turning, more and more, to the Post, which has been great.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)very publicly. Say on twitter--where the world can see.
Mme. Defarge
(8,033 posts)I lost all respect for the NYT after this Tuesday's over the top coverage of Hillary's illness. The WP, on the other hand, is a serious newspaper.
EV_Ares
(6,587 posts)Also, if you are a Prime Member, get a good buy.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)meme for decades too. Trump made the mistake of cutting the Post out of his news conferences, and they retaliated by giving him the Hillary treatment.
This election year I have subscriptions to both. No excuses, no excusing, no forgiveness for what I have witnessed.
Kber
(5,043 posts)The nytimes is my local paper, so it kinda sucks, but I subscribe to thr Washington post for national and international news. (Like I pay for it. Nytimes I only read what I can for free.)
Democat
(11,617 posts)I wonder who has put money in the company to keep them afloat?
EV_Ares
(6,587 posts)but some time ago I read where for a lot of the business reporters they are always going back & forth sort of from the Wall Street Journal & the NY Times. I don't know but they have really seemed to go after the Clintons this election.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)When I first saw the title of your OP, I thought you meant the New York Post.
Thank heavens that I read the full OP. You meant the WaPo. Whew!
As some have noted, the WaPo - until recently - has been every bit as bad as any M$M source. But it has been better in some respects lately.