Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:24 PM Nov 2012

Jon Husted Hatches a Plan to Make Sure Democrats Never Win Ohio Again


Jon Husted Hatches a Plan to Make Sure Democrats Never Win Ohio Again

Now that Barack Obama is the official and non-recountable winner in Scott-land, let’s fast-forward to the next bundle of mischief the Republicans are going to unleash on citizen innocents from here to the mid-terms. Like a jumping bean on Meth, far-right dirty tricksters are incapable of taking a break from their treachery of cutting Democrats off at the knees.

The red states are going to be the busiest of little bees (jumping beans?) in the continued creation of their latest political depravity. Here’s one tactic that is a favorite of Ohio’s radical right Secretary of State, Jon Husted, arguably the most partisan state politician in the nation.

This is Jon’s proposal as forwarded to me by an Ohio Professor-Emeritus friend of mine. A little background (spoiler alert: this could be a tad boring). Redistricting takes place every 10 years, right after the Census. The object is to make the population of each district roughly the same, but it’s really little more than establishing political advantage for the party in power. Most legislatures are the majordomos in the process, though they pretend to listen to input from others. The aforementioned Professor and I were both on an Ohio state commission (called a Politician Commission) for 2000 census redistricting. He had a brilliant and extremely fair apportionment idea that I, alone, supported.

As I’ve already explained, the party in power draws up the districts through states and/or commissions to favor their continued power to the greatest extent possible. Back to Husted. Here’s what Jon wants to do as tracked by the Daily Kos Meteor Blades from its origins at Plunderbund, a blog self-described as focusing on Ohio and national politics.

According to the above sources, and I’m quoting here, “The winner of each congressional district is awarded the districts electoral vote.” End quote.

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.politicususa.com/jon-husted-hatches-plan-democrats-win-ohio.html




We have to do our damnedest to make sure that states do NOT do this!
If all the states were to adopt this new way of allocating EVs then there would not really be a presidential election at all - it would end up being which ever party wins The House (the most congressional districts) takes the presidency automatically!



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
6. I don't think he will live long enough politically
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:49 PM
Nov 2012

to pull that one off. That idea simply makes the electoral college contradictory to itself. It cancels out what it's for.

Cha

(297,378 posts)
7. Ohio, Please Vote these VOTER Suppression A$$holes OUT in
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:49 PM
Nov 2012

2014! The Whole Country will Help you..I'm thinking!

InsultComicDog

(1,209 posts)
9. it's hard to imagine that any swing state would want to do this
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 08:40 PM
Nov 2012

Being a swing state with a large number of electoral votes makes a state very relevant and provides advantages to the state which is considered especially important to win favor in.

Splitting the total to make it basically irrelevant negates the state's advantage.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
10. This is why state executive and legislative offices are IMPORTANT. WA just elected a Teahadist SoS,
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 08:45 PM
Nov 2012
State Supreme Court judge, and passed a Nordquist measure to defund the state of needed revenue.

WA also elected a Democratic Governor and other positions, but with those 2 offices in place to diddle with elections, and a measure that goes against the state constitution and their judge to rule on it, it's going to be rough through 2014.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
11. I have a fondness for the
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 08:54 PM
Nov 2012

1792 French Solution. Calling Madame DeFarge! Calling Madame DeFarge~~ We have a front row seat for you and one to hold your knitting.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
12. WHOAH! Speaking of redistricitng, i noticed that Los Angeles lost 3 Dem congressional seats becuase
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:09 PM
Nov 2012

the districts were redistricted and in each case 2 Dems ran against each other. loss of 3 seats is a loss of 3 seats. So I wonder if this is why the GOP has Congress?

mtnlvr1946

(1 post)
14. Dems picked up 3 other seats in L.A. area.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 11:57 PM
Nov 2012

We did not lose because of the Dem vs Dem races. In California as a whole, Republicans picked up 3 seats, and Democrats picked up 6 for a net gain of 3. This could very well be expanded to a net gain of 5 if the 2 outstanding races continue to go to the Dems.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
15. which has nothing to do with the fact that redistricting took away 3 dem seats.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 12:41 AM
Nov 2012

I did not mean to sound rude. sorry bout that. angry at something far far away from DU.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Jon Husted Hatches a Plan...