Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow Bill Kristol could split the GOP in two
The influential conservative's call for a tax hike on the rich risks re-launching the Republican civil war of 1990
BY STEVE KORNACKI
The biggest news on Sunday was Bill Kristols declaration on Fox News Sunday that Republicans should give in on President Obamas demand that tax rates go up on income over $250,000 as part of any fiscal cliff deal.
It wont kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires, he said. It really wont, I dont think. I dont really understand why Republicans dont take Obamas offer.
As Alex Seitz-Wald explained yesterday, this is a potentially huge development. For more than two decades now, the Republican Party has been absolutely, unanimously opposed to income tax hikes. This might just be Kristol speaking for Kristol and no one else, but if his words signal or trigger an actual shift within the party, the policy consequences will be serious. It could also set off an intraparty civil war.
To understand why, you need to understand the roots of the GOPs intransigence on taxes. Believe it or not, it was fairly routine for Republicans to sign off on tax increases (or not to object to high rates already in place) until relatively recently. When Dwight Eisenhower was president, for instance, the top marginal rate was 90 percent, and at 70 percent through the Nixon and Ford years. It wasnt until Ronald Reagan embraced the then-emerging supply-side school of thought that Republicans really declared war on taxes, with Reagan signing sweeping cuts into law in 1981. But even then, he and his party retained some flexibility, and over the rest of his tenure Reagan backed a number of tax increases.
read more:
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1008 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Bill Kristol could split the GOP in two (Original Post)
DonViejo
Nov 2012
OP
Perhaps Kristol has looked over the results of the election and knows the best chance for Republican
Thinkingabout
Nov 2012
#1
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1. Perhaps Kristol has looked over the results of the election and knows the best chance for Republican
Accepting the right track for America is a good thing, ignoring the likes of Rush and other hater show talkers and perhaps saving the republican party. There is not going to be a war as far as Democrats are concerned, we are about governing. The republican path of obstruction in the past few years has not helped their party only adding to their demise.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)2. Of COURSE it won't ...
Most of them won't even notice the decrease in their bank accounts, for Chrissakes!
At it's core, America has to ask itself "How much money is enough?" for some of these people?
Some of these families have money they will never, ever spend - even over the course of several GENERATIONS. Do they really need that much? Really??