2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWTF - After Overriding Obama's Veto, Congress Is Now Having Second Thoughts About the 9/11 Bill
Republican congressional leaders said Thursday they might need to revisit a measure that allows victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to sue Saudi Arabia over worries that it will expose U.S. officials to lawsuits abroad.
It was just this week that Congress overwhelmingly voted to override President Obamas veto of the measure, which is now law. But some lawmakers already seemed to be backtracking from their embrace of the measure shortly before leaving town until after the November elections.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Thursday the law could have unintended ramifications and needed further discussion. But he blamed the White House for not making a forceful argument about the threat posed by the legislation to to U.S. officials.
Everybody was aware of who the potential beneficiaries were, but nobody had really focused on the potential downsides in terms of our international relationships, said McConnell, who voted to override the presidents veto.
Their comments infuriated White House officials who contend the dangers posed by the bill were obvious and articulated well ahead of the votes to pass the bill and then to override the veto.
The suggestion on the part of some members of the Senate was that they didnt know what they were voting on, that they didnt understand the negative consequences of the bill, he said Thursday. Thats a hard suggestion to take seriously.
The White House has warned the legislation is too broad and could set a dangerous precedent, inviting other nations to respond by suing American diplomats, military personnel and other officials in foreign courts over U.S. foreign policy actions.
While the bill is intended to aid 9/11 victims families pursuit of Saudi Arabia through the court system, it is broader than that and would allow courts to waive claims to foreign sovereign immunity in situations involving acts of terrorism on U.S. soil.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/09/29/republican-leaders-say-911-measure-may-need-to-be-revisited-after-elections/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_1_na
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)How about a) reading a bill before voting on it; and/or b) listening to the people, including the president, who warned you, clearly and often, about negative consequences inherent in that bill.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)For every US bomb that has harmed a child.
Baitball Blogger
(46,753 posts)rebuild New York at the country's expense, is it possible to pass on the reimbursement for damages to everyone else? For example, lower oil prices for everyone for the next twenty years?
C_U_L8R
(45,014 posts)They didn't freakin' read the bill.
They deserve the trap they fell into.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)So much incompetence so little time....
Maven
(10,533 posts)Like, a lot smarter. Than all of you and your reptilian GOP friends. NEXT TIME, listen, you fucking dunderhead.