Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,713 posts)
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 09:41 AM Oct 2016

538: Clinton’s Lead Is Becoming Safer

FiveThirtyEight

Gary Johnson averaged just 7 percentage points in 11 polls1 released on Thursday, continuing a string of bad results for the Libertarian Party nominee. At the same time, the number of undecided voters appears to be falling. Those two trends are combining to remove some of the uncertainty in our forecasts — historically, the number of undecided and third-party voters has been strongly correlated with both polling volatility and polling error. The share of voters not supporting the major-party candidates remains higher than it was at this point in the 2012 campaign, for example, but the more it shrinks, the safer Hillary Clinton’s lead becomes.

Clinton and Donald Trump now combine for a little over 84 percent of the vote. That’s the highest their combined share has been since we started issuing our forecasts in June.2 There hasn’t been a huge change, but it’s meaningful.

All this shouldn’t be too surprising. We’re now only about a month away from the election; more voters are making up their minds. In recent elections, moreover, third-party candidates have tended to fade in the polls as Election Day approaches — Johnson and Jill Stein, the Green Party nominee, appear to be following the same trend.

With more voters committed to one of the two major-party nominees, Trump simply has fewer people he can appeal to in order to make up his current deficit, which makes Clinton’s lead more secure. A 5-percentage-point lead with about 15 percent of the electorate undecided or voting for a third-party candidate (about where the race currently stands) is far better than a 5-point lead with over 20 percent of the electorate undecided or voting for a third-party candidate (about where the race was in mid-June). That’s part of the reason that Clinton’s chances of winning the election are in the upper 70s now, while they were in the low 70s back in June.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
538: Clinton’s Lead Is Becoming Safer (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2016 OP
I bet Johnson doesn't get 3% nationwide BlueStreak Oct 2016 #1
I bet between 1.5 and 1.75%. .3% for Stein. onehandle Oct 2016 #2
Correct. He got about 4% in an early Oct. 2012 poll from CNN. jpljr77 Oct 2016 #6
I hope he gets quite a bit more than that… regnaD kciN Oct 2016 #3
A month ago, Johnson was hurting Clinton more than Trump BlueStreak Oct 2016 #4
Safer in a lot more ways than just this one. Hortensis Oct 2016 #5

jpljr77

(1,004 posts)
6. Correct. He got about 4% in an early Oct. 2012 poll from CNN.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 01:23 PM
Oct 2016

His final popular vote total in 2012 was 0.99%.

This guy, a former two-term governor, should be doing much, MUCH better in this particular election. But he just didn't bother learning....anything.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
3. I hope he gets quite a bit more than that…
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 10:25 AM
Oct 2016

…with every single one of his votes coming from erstwhile conservative Republicans who can't bring themselves to vote for Drumpf.



 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. A month ago, Johnson was hurting Clinton more than Trump
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 10:30 AM
Oct 2016

But the past 3 weeks of polling (comparing 4-way to 2-way) shows the Johnson impact is about evenly split between Clinton and Trump. That tells me that there were about 3% of the voters who didn't really want to support Clinton and considered Johnson an alternative, if even for a protest vote. But as they get to know what a dumbass Johnson is, they have moved to Clinton.

I think those who are still naming Johnson in the polls are likely to either vote for Johnson or stay home, most likely the latter. After all, why go out to vote when you could be smoking a nice bag of weed?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. Safer in a lot more ways than just this one.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 12:51 PM
Oct 2016

Pollster Matt McDermott points to this as an example of the floodgates opening.

More than 30 former Republican members of Congress issued a scathing open letter Thursday announcing their opposition to Donald Trump and urging fellow Republicans to deny him the White House.

The group recants the GOP presidential candidate's long list of insults and "lies," and said his "disgraceful candidacy is indefensible."

"As Republican members of Congress, we took pride in representing a political party that stood for honest and principled public leadership in which the American people could place their trust," they wrote in an open letter.

"Sadly, our party's nominee this year is a man who makes a mockery of the principles and values we have cherished and which we sought to represent in Congress."

The group includes key swing state figures, and is the largest showing of one-time GOP officials refusing to back the party's presidential nominee this year.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538: Clinton’s Lead Is Be...