2016 Postmortem

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts) Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:52 AM Oct 2016

BREAKING CLINTON + 4 in OH +8 in PA + 4 IN WI before Pu$$ygate

https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/10/08/trump-voters-oh-pa-tape-revelations/

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

*****BREAKING***** CLINTON + 4 in OH +8 in PA + 4 IN WI before Pu$$ygate (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2016 OP

K&R! stonecutter357 Oct 2016 #1

Trashpot once said to Stern "Vagina is very expensive"... Cakes488 Oct 2016 #2

This is great news. Oh yes it it. underthematrix Oct 2016 #3

Senate Numbers: Coolie_J Oct 2016 #4

Before!? workinclasszero Oct 2016 #5

Good results in general. triron Oct 2016 #6

I wondered about that, too. Maybe ... dawg Oct 2016 #9

Definitely not Pa triron Oct 2016 #10

Yet Sam Wang hs HRC win at 95% (bayesian). triron Oct 2016 #7

I think there's a possibility of a 50 state sweep for her. Vinca Oct 2016 #8

stonecutter357

(12,697 posts)

1. K&R!

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:55 AM

Oct 2016

Cakes488

(874 posts)

2. Trashpot once said to Stern "Vagina is very expensive"...

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:56 AM

Oct 2016

I hope it costs you EVERYTHING you trampy trashpot trump

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)

3. This is great news. Oh yes it it.

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:56 AM

Oct 2016

Coolie_J

(6 posts)

4. Senate Numbers:

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:57 AM

Oct 2016

WI: Feingold 45, Johnson 42
PA: McGinty 42, Toomey 42
OH: Portman 49-Strickland 38

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)

5. Before!?

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 11:02 AM

Oct 2016

Wow can't wait to see the after pu$$ygate revelation numbers!

triron

(22,006 posts)

6. Good results in general.

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:18 PM

Oct 2016

I don't understand why 538's now cast went down slightly. Makes no sense at all to me. Ohio win probability has not changed despite 2 new polls showing HRC up there. wtf??

dawg

(10,624 posts)

9. I wondered about that, too. Maybe ...

Reply to triron (Reply #6)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:29 PM

Oct 2016

the PA and WI numbers are below trend?

triron

(22,006 posts)

10. Definitely not Pa

Reply to dawg (Reply #9)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:40 PM

Oct 2016

+12 and +8 is at least as good as ever. Wisconsin +4 maybe slightly below average (but heck that's one poll).
And yet also another Florida poll with HRC +3, then Virginia +12. Could be the stupid gravis poll showing a tie in Colorado?

triron

(22,006 posts)

7. Yet Sam Wang hs HRC win at 95% (bayesian).

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:21 PM

Oct 2016

Vinca

(50,276 posts)

8. I think there's a possibility of a 50 state sweep for her.

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:24 PM

Oct 2016

If the GOP manages to ditch Trump somehow, his supporters will not vote for whoever they put up and the Republican ticket will be sliced and diced to the point they probably won't be able to win in a deep red state.

Reply to this discussion