2016 Postmortem

LisaM

(27,813 posts) Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:11 PM Oct 2016

Now he's debating Martha Raddetz.

This is the strangest thing I have ever seen.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Now he's debating Martha Raddetz. (Original Post) LisaM Oct 2016 OP

This is surreal uppityperson Oct 2016 #1

She stated the obvious - the military has reasons for what they do - and then WHAT IS YOUR STRATEGY? underpants Oct 2016 #2

And she has been right in those regions that is being talked about. SummerSnow Oct 2016 #3

Big mistake there. TheCowsCameHome Oct 2016 #4

"Let me tell you" ~ he had to work to not say "sweetheart" Lifelong Protester Oct 2016 #5

Afterwards he'll be saying how much of a disaster Martha was meadowlark5 Oct 2016 #6

She was a Pentagon correspondent Worktodo Oct 2016 #7

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)

1. This is surreal

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:12 PM

Oct 2016

underpants

(182,823 posts)

2. She stated the obvious - the military has reasons for what they do - and then WHAT IS YOUR STRATEGY?

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:12 PM

Oct 2016

Wow

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)

3. And she has been right in those regions that is being talked about.

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:12 PM

Oct 2016

But he knows more than her.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)

4. Big mistake there.

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:12 PM

Oct 2016

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)

5. "Let me tell you" ~ he had to work to not say "sweetheart"

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:13 PM

Oct 2016

meadowlark5

(2,795 posts)

6. Afterwards he'll be saying how much of a disaster Martha was

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:13 PM

Oct 2016

She was so unfair. Obviously in the tank for Hillary. Martha never asked Hillary to explain anything blah, blah, blah

Worktodo

(288 posts)

7. She was a Pentagon correspondent

Reply to LisaM (Original post)

Sun Oct 9, 2016, 10:16 PM

Oct 2016

He must not know anything about her because she's an expert. Could explain all these things he "doesn't understand". Also he disagrees with his own running mate! On a national security issue!! WTH!!!

Reply to this discussion