Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 11:27 PM Oct 2016

LAT: "This wasn't a game changer - which means it was a victory for Clinton."

Bottom line: This wasn’t a game-changer -- which means it was a victory for Clinton. She’s ahead; she doesn’t need the game to change. Trump’s the candidate who needed to alter the direction of the race, and nothing he said or did suggests that he achieved that goal.

http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-second-presidential-debate-scorecard/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LAT: "This wasn't a game changer - which means it was a victory for Clinton." (Original Post) stopbush Oct 2016 OP
But Republican Frank Luntz said... molova Oct 2016 #1
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»LAT: "This wasn't a ...