Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:14 PM Oct 2016

Clinton pulled back on a kill shot for a reason: Keep Trump on the ticket

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/clinton-pulled-back-kill-shot-145130698.html

The bar has now been set so low for the GOP nominee that he could do the following on stage in St. Louis and still receive passing grades: suggest that as president he would jail his opponent; defend Vladimir Putin and Russia over the hacking of the U.S. election; praise brutal Syrian tyrant Bashar Assad; admit to not paying federal income tax; and rebuke his own running mate for daring to criticize Russia over the indiscriminate bombing of Syrian civilians....

Trump also lied with enthusiastic regularity, again saying he opposed the second Iraq war before it started (he didn't), claimed his opponent would jack up the tax rate on the middle class (she says she won't) and protested that he did not Tweet at 3 a.m. that people should check out a sex tape featuring a former Miss Universe (he did)....

And Clinton for her part opted not to go for the kill shot. She mostly laughed off Trump's attacks and declined to bring up the sexual assault allegations against him, instead pivoting to her own vision for the nation's future. The lack of aggression irritated some Democrats who wanted to see Clinton knock down a staggering opponent.

But the high-road approach appeared to work with voters who declared Clinton the winner of the debate in multiple polls. And Clinton may have held back for strategic reasons, preferring to keep Trump alive rather than bait him into campaign killing moments that could drive him off the ticket in favor of Mike Pence . Clinton would likely win in any scenario but a Trump withdrawal would create significant uncertainty in a race that is now tilting back heavily in Clinton's direction.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

unitedwethrive

(1,997 posts)
9. Exactly. The Dems have a well calculated plan to take down as much of the repub party as possible.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:38 PM
Oct 2016

By keeping Donald in the race, and having just enough support of his fellow party members, it makes it much easier for them all to go down together when bombshells are released closer to the election. The Clinton campaign was afraid that the repubs were already imploding over the weekend, and if that had happened, it might have given them enough time in the final month for everyone to separate from Don, and enable them to channel all of their money to down ticket races and save the Senate.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. not so much about keeping him on the ticket, rather to get Republicans to continue to embrace him
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:19 PM
Oct 2016

Let the enemy gather his forces into one concentrated area, centered around one easily located target, then unload the really heavy artillery on them.

ffr

(22,670 posts)
3. I think they know a thing or two about how to win a campaign.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:20 PM
Oct 2016

It'll be up to us to make sure that every eligible voter gets out and EVs or votes on election day.

Lots of work still remaining!

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
4. She's saving the kill shots for later
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:24 PM
Oct 2016

When it's too late for the RNC to replace the Apricot Asshole with someone else.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
10. There are only two ways he could be replaced at this point
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 06:10 PM
Oct 2016

1). He voluntarily quits

2). Mortality calls in Trump's number

That's it. And the only "safety net" left is that there's a lot of back chatter about him quitting and Pence moving up to the top of the ticket. I posted something on DU yesterday from Ben Stein, who salivated over the process of that scenario, with Rubio or his "favorite" Lindsey Graham in the VP slot.

But unless Trump bails of his own free will, this is what the RNC's got.

Of course, the other way of looking at this is that Trump can quit whenever he wants...like, for example, November 7th. He is thoroughly unequipped to handle massive defeat. Even if he plays his "the election is rigged" guy, he lacks the ability to deal with "losing for the first time" (and I put that in quotes because he is in complete denial over his business failures, his bankruptcies, daddy bailing him out, his divorces, any of that).

So I see him pulling every slimy stunt he can before now and November 8th, but his ego cannot handle a loss, and even if he challenged the results, he has to have substantial proof and any recounts won't happen overnight. If he goes for Bush v Gore and loses that, he comes up a bigger loser than losing on November 8th.

This is just one of those rare elections where we can't predict anything. It seems to be certain that Clinton will beat him on November 8th, but what he does between now and then, and after the votes are counted, is anyone's guess.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton pulled back on a ...