2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRepublicans bristle at notion they failed to vet Trump
By Jonathan Swan - 10/18/16 03:48 PM EDT
Campaign operatives who competed against Donald Trump in the Republican primaries are bristling at suggestions they failed to fully investigate the businessman during his march to the nomination.
Trumps campaign has been rocked by multiple accusations of sexual misconduct, which came to light after a damaging video was uncovered this month from 2005 in which the businessman talks about grabbing women by the pussy. Before that, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton steered media attention toward Trumps treatment of women by calling out Trumps mockery of a former Miss Universe as Miss Piggy.
With each new revelation, political observers wonder: How did such damaging material escape the attention of the 16 Republicans Trump beat during the primaries?
Mike Murphy, who led the $118 million super PAC effort to elect Jeb Bush, said its horseshit to suggest his team didnt do enough opposition research on Trump.
-snip-
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/301616-republicans-bristle-at-notion-they-failed-to-vet-trump
Emilybemily
(204 posts)they were stupid enough to think that his filthy assholeness wouldn't matter.
It doesn't make them look any better to say they DID vet him. Not one bit.
Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)LisaM
(27,840 posts)and they don't have a representative primary system. The winner-take-all in most primary states and the low turnout in caucus states are both a problem. It's very easy to scoop up the delegates in a caucus state with pretty minimal voter participation, but I think the winner-take-all system deserves equal blame here. Trump couldn't have pulled away like that if they'd allocated the primary votes proportionately (and a few people had dropped out earlier).
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)in Trump's favor?
LisaM
(27,840 posts)Yes, apparently that is what I was getting at! Well played!
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)I fully expect the Powers That Be behind the GOP to revamp their primary system
avebury
(10,952 posts)Everything that the Clinton campaign has dug up on Trump would have been just as readily available to the Republicans if they bothered to do their own homework.
Hillary has run a spectacular ground game. She has people watching Trump like a hawk and jumping on the meat he constantly throws out and turning it into great political ads/videos. Their turn around time just blows me away.
mainer
(12,031 posts)and afraid to have Trump accuse them of their own failings. So they said nothing.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)Trump got a lot of attention early for tweeting that Jeb Bush was "low energy" and Bush never recovered from that, and I think a lot of Republicans were afraid of being in Trump's Twitter crosshairs.
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)centrally involved in the biggest scandal. But even take that away, and there has been so much low hanging fruit, from Howard Stern, to what he said about John McCain, to his financial situation etc., that it smacks of incompetence.
apnu
(8,759 posts)Yup, this is on the 15 other Republicans who competed against Trump. This is also on the RNC and every other non-Trump Republican or Conservative organization.
These fools are so tribal, they're gullible to anybody who claims tribe membership. Trump says he's a conservative, therefore, they think, he is a conservative. Trump says he's a billionaire, therefore, they think, he is a billionaire. Pick anything that conservatives say and you'll find that most conservatives believe it simply because it was said by a conservative. They don't have a single skeptical bone in their body when it comes to evaluating one of their own.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Mike Daniels
(5,842 posts)The reality is all the other candidates were more concerned with not alienating Trump's supporters and therefore hung back hoping he'd flame out.
The other problem was that there was no concentrated effort to take him out. If Cruz, Christie, Bush and Rubio (the others were pretenders running for the sole purpose of upping their CPAC speaking fees) had worked together with each attacking Trump on a different weakness they may have been able to take him out. Instead, you had one person attacking him at a time making it easy for Trump to pick off each one.
The entire GOP primary was an example of gross malpractice / incompetence in action.
riversedge
(70,320 posts)rurallib
(62,455 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)The GOP owners pretending they vetted Trump is cute. Makes me think of this;
procon
(15,805 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)All they had to do was speak to Jeb's cousin.
Hekate
(90,840 posts)....to stop Trump. The first was for all the primary candidates to do oppo research on him like you would think anyone with brains would do. The second was the Convention itself.
The first failure was stupidity. The second failure was cowardice. They have no one to blame but themselves. They FAILED.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Teh Donald. No oppo research, never taking him seriously until it was too late, screwing up debates in such a predictable way that it became child's play for Teh Don.
Political malpractice on a scale so YUGE that it may have destroyed the GOP as a functioning party.
Amazing. But, then Teh Donald had a lot of help. The TeaBaggers have done their best to destroy the House, dividing it until it falls. Well, it is now fall, (gawd what a bad pun) and it is more divided than ever.