Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 10:48 PM Oct 2016

So I headed over to JPR to see how the Piners were handling the Assangeraper not having Wifi...

And I immediately got sidetracked by the funniest thread ever: http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/oh-my-the-national-enquirer-tomorrow-will-be-hot/

REALLY? This is where they get their breaking news about Hillary? No wonder...



Oh my!!! So I guess I got what I deserve for even looking in over there. So I said,"Let me try again." And got to looking. I typed 'Assange' into the search doohickey and presto! Maybe presto is the wrong word, but I did see THAT nugget of pure nonsense fantasy...
I see people are just tossing shit out and serving it up, but not many takers this day, it happens. But really, I did want to know what they thought about assange losing the web. Looked again; found it!

Very interesting opinions:http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/we-can-confirm-ecuador-cut-off-assanges-internet-access/


Here is a sampling of the range of opinions, paraphrased, of course:

Assange will be abducted!

They already tried, but failed!!

John Kerry made them cut off his internet on Queen Hillary's orders!!

Somebody needs to helicopter in and save him!

We'll never hear from him again!

We need help from The Russians!!

The Russians can save him!!

He is not a Russian puppet!!!

Maybe the Russians can fly in and transfer him to their embassy!

Or China!!

Plus Snowden!!

Kerry, Obama, and Hillary are a nazi haven of fools more dangerous than Trump! Must be stopped! This is attempted murder!


There you have it. This has been my review of JPR and the Assange has no Wfi story. See you all tomorrow for the debate!


301 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So I headed over to JPR to see how the Piners were handling the Assangeraper not having Wifi... (Original Post) bravenak Oct 2016 OP
So WTF. I see many duers over there that I don't see over here any more. What is the deal? All of lonestarnot Oct 2016 #1
Most of them could post here if they wanted to bravenak Oct 2016 #3
They bashing Hillary. I never heard such bullshit. Some of them I really really liked. WTF! I am lonestarnot Oct 2016 #5
Yup. n/t zappaman Oct 2016 #13
That's how I felt too. bravenak Oct 2016 #15
I believe so. lovemydog Oct 2016 #127
They made the primaries a living hell here. nt JTFrog Oct 2016 #159
Yup -- and, they posted horrible stuff against Hillary during the Primaries obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #194
I think they GP6971 Oct 2016 #6
They made that as a supposed Bernie site or so they said. Rex Oct 2016 #27
they support a confessed stalking sexual predator, racist, sociopathic liar, Cha Oct 2016 #31
I hope they stay there after the election. Rex Oct 2016 #35
They'll be back...with lots and lots of "concern" or outrage NYC Liberal Oct 2016 #249
I've been enjoying the absence of the bashing threads. Rex Oct 2016 #274
who also greymattermom Oct 2016 #207
The JPR posters do not live in the real world Gothmog Oct 2016 #218
They have gone from pro-Bernie to pro-Trump, pro-Putin with Bernie thrown under the bus. pampango Oct 2016 #191
Many were Obama haters too...they are not and never were progressive Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #210
Agreed-many of the JPR poster were never democrats Gothmog Oct 2016 #220
Lot of far-lefters started as and still are anti-Democrats, Hortensis Oct 2016 #212
I wish I could feel kinder toward them. Or more sympathetic. calimary Oct 2016 #242
Can't say I miss them Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2016 #51
Still are. nt sheshe2 Oct 2016 #134
Many started out BOB but are now mostly Stein or Trump supporters...amazing how Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #208
I can't see anybody over there, you sure? snooper2 Oct 2016 #236
The masks came off n/m ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2016 #247
The hatred for Hillary is strong. Dawson Leery Oct 2016 #7
Overpowering bravenak Oct 2016 #20
Agree Renew Deal Oct 2016 #199
Definition of misogyny: oldtime dfl_er Oct 2016 #65
Really is frightening how dim some people are. NCTraveler Oct 2016 #8
The horseshoe effect in action bravenak Oct 2016 #16
Yep, you nailed it CajunBlazer Oct 2016 #55
Could it be Stockholm Syndrome? sheshe2 Oct 2016 #89
I think we need to take the idea very seriously bravenak Oct 2016 #95
Oh my goodness. sheshe2 Oct 2016 #146
It takes years :( bravenak Oct 2016 #149
sigh~ sheshe2 Oct 2016 #168
I'm starting to feel it, sister! bravenak Oct 2016 #175
I am thinking that too, bravenak. sheshe2 Oct 2016 #186
Haha! lovemydog Oct 2016 #151
Lol! sheshe2 Oct 2016 #169
Fuck those worthless losers GusBob Oct 2016 #9
Knock it off. Some of those "worthless losers" were good friends of mine for many years, scarletwoman Oct 2016 #11
No GusBob Oct 2016 #17
I feel the same way. Thanks. zonkers Oct 2016 #21
I agree with you, scarletwoman. I actually feel sad about it myself. Hekate Oct 2016 #25
Excuse me, let me get this straight. DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #37
Where did I say that I wanted anyone to feel sorry for them? scarletwoman Oct 2016 #45
I wouldn't even call them friends anymore. VulgarPoet Oct 2016 #201
If their current actions merit it, then why shouldn't they be called out? mythology Oct 2016 #47
Even the ones who support Trump? CajunBlazer Oct 2016 #57
Some chose to leave because they couldn't use the "c" word, or other sexist slurs when referring to still_one Oct 2016 #68
I'm not defending those who chose to leave DU. All I said is that I'm sad to have lost old friends. scarletwoman Oct 2016 #76
I know you are not defending those who chose to leave. It would have been nice if everyone had still_one Oct 2016 #99
There were many Hillary supporters who are no longer here thanks Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #216
I know. I am well am aware of that, and those that were involved with those bullying still_one Oct 2016 #240
Absolutely right. Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #284
I agree elmac Oct 2016 #86
You're absolutely right, they're not idiots and losers RonniePudding Oct 2016 #183
Knock it off. Some of those "worthless losers" were good russian trolls. stonecutter357 Oct 2016 #192
Then you should ahve changed your friends obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #196
You are entitled to your opinion, even when it's wrong. BobbyDrake Oct 2016 #202
Read their posts. Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #211
Many of the JPR types are now supporting trump and Russia Gothmog Oct 2016 #224
Your last sentence.................. nini Oct 2016 #241
I am not defending them. Sheesh! All I said was that I'm sad to have lost old friends. scarletwoman Oct 2016 #282
I understand how you feel bravenak Oct 2016 #287
Thank you, that means a lot to me. (nt) scarletwoman Oct 2016 #298
And now they've dropped the "both parties are bad" pretense and gone full Trump ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2016 #248
Do you still talk to these good friends? Are you on good terms? Cakes488 Oct 2016 #252
No. I've had no contact with any of them once they went over to JPR. (nt) scarletwoman Oct 2016 #283
Thank you dflprincess Oct 2016 #301
You most certainly can give your opinion. Cha Oct 2016 #33
Almost at the finish line Cha! fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #82
I just saw you on another Cha Oct 2016 #88
A few decent people post in both places geek tragedy Oct 2016 #74
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #10
RW sites have been discussed on DU ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #14
because "the left" and "the right" are not equal and opposite evil forces to your wonderful center. yodermon Oct 2016 #41
they support Trump there so they are a Right wing site just like Freepers JI7 Oct 2016 #53
No not the same in ideology - they simply exhibit the same behavior... CajunBlazer Oct 2016 #59
The tactics of those Jamaal510 Oct 2016 #63
JPR pushes RW talking points ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #75
jackpine would be shaking his head. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2016 #139
I know. NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #145
They support Trump and pimp O'Keefe and Breitbart geek tragedy Oct 2016 #85
I see some of the pro Monsanto people over there loving Trump womanofthehills Oct 2016 #260
Is this a personal attack on a current member here? Tsk tsk! bravenak Oct 2016 #18
Sounded like one to me. Cha Oct 2016 #38
Hey! bravenak Oct 2016 #42
Yeah.. he must know how Cha Oct 2016 #64
Sorry if you feel your friends over there got dissed, but their names were not even used... Hekate Oct 2016 #22
I know, jeeze bravenak Oct 2016 #32
I just Cha Oct 2016 #40
This op was the least offensive I could find on the subject bravenak Oct 2016 #43
They have gone insane over there womanofthehills Oct 2016 #131
The 90s called, they want their Clinton conspiracy theories back. betsuni Oct 2016 #136
It's like, a cornucopia of infuckingsane bravenak Oct 2016 #144
Oh, so we're not allowed to see what a rwing site is doing to support Cha Oct 2016 #34
I have no rules. You are allowed to do whatever you want. zonkers Oct 2016 #44
Yet you called brave out by name on a Democratic site. sheshe2 Oct 2016 #118
This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2016 #39
Project much? JTFrog Oct 2016 #160
Talking is fun. lovemydog Oct 2016 #162
The rumor mill was he was porning an 8-year-old girl, using her 22-year-old sisters dating account. TheBlackAdder Oct 2016 #12
Let's just hope that's not true. Otherwise they need to kick him out of there. bravenak Oct 2016 #19
It's as if the Republican party doesn't exist over there. betsuni Oct 2016 #23
Succinctly put! bravenak Oct 2016 #24
A lot of them post on DI Rex Oct 2016 #26
Holy shit. bravenak Oct 2016 #29
Looks like the LoonyToons express to Koo-Koo for Cocoa Puffs Junction to me. n/t The Genealogist Oct 2016 #279
Good job Bravenak! Ligyron Oct 2016 #28
Anytime! bravenak Oct 2016 #30
Someone tell the Primary is over Jason1961 Oct 2016 #36
Nothing we can do to stop this bravenak Oct 2016 #46
And I love how they've whipped out their magnifying glasses and Sherlock Holmes hats betsuni Oct 2016 #48
Right?!?!! bravenak Oct 2016 #58
What's hilarious about that too lovemydog Oct 2016 #173
The two-faced are the worst. betsuni Oct 2016 #182
They actually hide posts over there! CajunBlazer Oct 2016 #49
It was the crazy National Enq. shit that got hidden bravenak Oct 2016 #52
All you have to do is say something nice about Hillary. nt JTFrog Oct 2016 #165
I joined last December GulfCoast66 Oct 2016 #50
Ahh! You witnessed my fall from grace in real time. bravenak Oct 2016 #56
You are spot on with this JustAnotherGen Oct 2016 #231
I had forgotten that GulfCoast66 Oct 2016 #235
Nope - I quit JustAnotherGen Oct 2016 #245
It's like free Teapublic Agnosticsherbet Oct 2016 #54
Worse in a way since I used to like many of them bravenak Oct 2016 #61
Yes, but they appear to have chsnged. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2016 #98
I know! It's sad to me bravenak Oct 2016 #101
I liked many of them too. sheshe2 Oct 2016 #154
I know. We must forget them bravenak Oct 2016 #158
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #60
Boring bravenak Oct 2016 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #66
I'm sure I have no clue what you're on about bravenak Oct 2016 #67
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #69
Oh dear, I'm shocked! CajunBlazer Oct 2016 #70
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #71
"That troll should be banned. " ucrdem Oct 2016 #72
Hi Aloha, ucr! Cha Oct 2016 #94
If I were you, I would be more concerned about what your posts say about you. CajunBlazer Oct 2016 #73
So glad no one suffered Cha Oct 2016 #92
The stalkers are here? sheshe2 Oct 2016 #128
Ah bravenak, that's just "locker room talk" don't you know. fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #77
My bad! It's all good. I'm just hysterical, my period, apologies... bravenak Oct 2016 #78
You period. No wonder you posted these bloody facts. sheshe2 Oct 2016 #157
She is fantastic!! bravenak Oct 2016 #161
Rose Garden? sheshe2 Oct 2016 #171
Hell, she can do both! bravenak Oct 2016 #177
She is Woman! sheshe2 Oct 2016 #185
Yeah! bravenak Oct 2016 #187
Flea! Cha Oct 2016 #83
Cha! fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #87
Agi-prop it seems, or lame satire. Coyotl Oct 2016 #79
Why not? Just as important as half the shit posted here bravenak Oct 2016 #80
Is there a numbered ranking system of importance here that I missed? nt fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #91
.. Cha Oct 2016 #96
! JTFrog Oct 2016 #167
By the way, I completely agree with your now-deleted post below, every word. (nt) betsuni Oct 2016 #179
because idiots need to be exposed? snooper2 Oct 2016 #238
What leads you to intentionally conflate benign interest with importance? LanternWaste Oct 2016 #239
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #102
It seems the JPR has morphed into a 100% anti progressive site elmac Oct 2016 #103
Yaaaass bravenak Oct 2016 #104
I haven't checked out the site in months elmac Oct 2016 #106
JPR is a pro trump site now which is sad Gothmog Oct 2016 #228
The thing about JPR ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #105
Fuck yeah bravenak Oct 2016 #107
JPR has been ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #115
I think they took most of our rightwinger with them when they left bravenak Oct 2016 #125
"Hating Hillary: An Internet Tale" -- at least do an article! betsuni Oct 2016 #130
I'd have to decide which stuff to put in bravenak Oct 2016 #141
So true. NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #152
Talk about 'uninformed' bravenak Oct 2016 #153
Well, they're "informed" enough to KNOW ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #163
Of course they are! bravenak Oct 2016 #166
Even as we speak ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #174
Of course! bravenak Oct 2016 #178
RW talking points. sheshe2 Oct 2016 #180
+1 betsuni Oct 2016 #124
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2016 #259
So, you had to go over there zentrum Oct 2016 #110
"That's it exactly." grossproffit Oct 2016 #111
Bingo! bravenak Oct 2016 #114
Bonzai! Cha Oct 2016 #117
Oh Snap! sheshe2 Oct 2016 #181
It took negative thirty seconds to find something foolish bravenak Oct 2016 #113
Some of the people zentrum Oct 2016 #120
I didn't name any names, I just posted the reaction to 'Assange has not internet' bravenak Oct 2016 #123
You're on a soapbox about "what DU should be" even as your membership there has been revealed? BobbyDrake Oct 2016 #204
What is JPR trying to accomplish? Airing every conspiracy theory they can come up with? randome Oct 2016 #222
"long-time DUers" obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #254
Yeah, she did.. they're advocating for trump And, you're excusing Cha Oct 2016 #116
It takes no time at all, it's a vending machine of stupid. betsuni Oct 2016 #122
"A vending machine of stupid." NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #143
Yeah, they were posting close-ups of her pants and insisting metal bolts fell out betsuni Oct 2016 #148
I know - can you believe people are THAT gullible? NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #155
WTF -- for real???? obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #255
For real! NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #280
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Oct 2016 #170
Lol, active JPR member exposed! BobbyDrake Oct 2016 #203
"try not be sore winners" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2016 #250
Oh, everything totally is as the OP says obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #253
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #112
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #119
More comic relief. lovemydog Oct 2016 #121
It's like watching that dumb ass Jill Stein commercial on repeat bravenak Oct 2016 #126
I haven't seen it. lovemydog Oct 2016 #132
I won't. It irritates. Saw it over and over and over... bravenak Oct 2016 #138
That's what I say.. Cha Oct 2016 #129
We gotta keep laughing! lovemydog Oct 2016 #133
Right. They will NOT Stop US. Cha Oct 2016 #135
That's some sick shit lillypaddle Oct 2016 #137
Glad we are here instead! bravenak Oct 2016 #140
No doubt. lillypaddle Oct 2016 #142
The National Enquirer lovemydog Oct 2016 #147
OMG OMG OMG sheshe2 Oct 2016 #184
I wouldn't put them past it, tbh. nt VulgarPoet Oct 2016 #205
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #150
what a bunch of nut jobs stonecutter357 Oct 2016 #193
That site's "about us" page is REALLY REALLY REALLY out of date. NurseJackie Oct 2016 #198
You will never find..... Adrahil Oct 2016 #200
THIS! BobbyDrake Oct 2016 #206
K&R mcar Oct 2016 #209
The thing that upsets me the most... Adrahil Oct 2016 #213
That is the maddening thing to me too bravenak Oct 2016 #217
At least some of them had the sense Bobbie Jo Oct 2016 #214
I know, right? bravenak Oct 2016 #221
The JPR posters are sad people who believe any and all conspiracy theories Gothmog Oct 2016 #215
Me too it's hilarious bravenak Oct 2016 #219
The threads on election law are really sad but funny Gothmog Oct 2016 #232
I am ashamed that I used to post, there. Odin2005 Oct 2016 #223
Don't be bravenak Oct 2016 #225
Yeah, I joined because they had a lot of pro-Bernie stuff. Odin2005 Oct 2016 #229
You live up to your name brer cat Oct 2016 #226
It WAS scary. bravenak Oct 2016 #227
We could have a bake sale brer cat Oct 2016 #233
You deserve it! NastyRiffraff Oct 2016 #246
Everybody on that site represented the worst of DU. sufrommich Oct 2016 #230
There are still a few lurking here who need to be cleaned up ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2016 #251
THIS 100% -- and obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #256
And many of them were perma- hosts who loved ignoring alerts from "SJWs".... bettyellen Oct 2016 #257
Buncha crazy people ismnotwasm Oct 2016 #234
Hee hee. I thoght this had to do with "Pinin' for the fjords" from Monte Python! CTyankee Oct 2016 #237
These people and The_Donald redditors make Freepers look sane budkin Oct 2016 #243
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #244
On November 9, some of the posters there MineralMan Oct 2016 #258
elected officials are not the only ones who should be held accountable for their bad acts nt geek tragedy Oct 2016 #262
I've noted this phenomenon...this tendency to scurry back under the tent flaps msanthrope Oct 2016 #264
I expect to use the subject line geek tragedy Oct 2016 #267
Yes, MsA, this -- hold ground and not give them the attention obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #269
Haven't been there in a while. fifthoffive Oct 2016 #261
"both ways" obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #270
LOL Blue_Tires Oct 2016 #263
Here you can't whisper anyting bad about Hillary LiberalLovinLug Oct 2016 #265
the vast majority of Bernie supporters have lined up behind geek tragedy Oct 2016 #266
seriously -- whatever obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #271
Let's be clear. NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #275
I agree 100% mcar Oct 2016 #276
Exactly. ismnotwasm Oct 2016 #277
This of course GusBob Oct 2016 #278
Really. NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #281
As clear as an unmuddied lake LiberalLovinLug Oct 2016 #285
The 85% Bernie supporters number ... NanceGreggs Oct 2016 #286
Yeah, she's fighting for Trump now. A real "fighter." grossproffit Oct 2016 #295
"I hope after the election that the more brighter ones come back." betsuni Oct 2016 #296
Usually DU burn boards are amusing, but that one is just tragic. Starry Messenger Oct 2016 #268
Hi, brave. Skidmore Oct 2016 #272
And after the election when returning/reincarnated trolls/Democrat-haters return, betsuni Oct 2016 #288
I hope so too bravenak Oct 2016 #289
The feet to the fire crowd allows the GOP to win mid-term elections Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #297
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #290
Oh honey, nobody cares because those JPR trolls are perfectly described as terrible liars. betsuni Oct 2016 #291
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #292
Okay, maybe a nice bath before beddy-boo? betsuni Oct 2016 #293
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #294
Granted, my available time follow stuff varies, but I never heard of "JPR" themaguffin Oct 2016 #299
Jackpine Radicals dot com bravenak Oct 2016 #300
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
1. So WTF. I see many duers over there that I don't see over here any more. What is the deal? All of
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 10:56 PM
Oct 2016

them canned from here? People I haven't seen in years are over there.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
5. They bashing Hillary. I never heard such bullshit. Some of them I really really liked. WTF! I am
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:01 PM
Oct 2016

really fucking disappointed. Did they troll here for all those years?

obamanut2012

(26,077 posts)
194. Yup -- and, they posted horrible stuff against Hillary during the Primaries
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 06:16 AM
Oct 2016

DU became a Hillary Hate Site for a few months, for real.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
27. They made that as a supposed Bernie site or so they said.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:01 AM
Oct 2016

Turns out it was all HRC hate. Depresses me too, some of those names are old names that posted here on DU1 and 2. Now they support Trump...I have no respect for them. None.

Cha

(297,244 posts)
31. they support a confessed stalking sexual predator, racist, sociopathic liar,
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:08 AM
Oct 2016

really stupid asshole for potus. They're ok with that.. and twist themselves into stupid pretzels to make it so.

The HDS is rotting their brains.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
35. I hope they stay there after the election.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:12 AM
Oct 2016

I won't be kind to anyone that supported Trump that crawls back over here.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
249. They'll be back...with lots and lots of "concern" or outrage
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:17 PM
Oct 2016

about every little thing Hillary does. Just like they did win Obama.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
274. I've been enjoying the absence of the bashing threads.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 06:13 PM
Oct 2016

It won't be the same for them, a lot of us will never let them live this down. It will be their Used Car Salesman moment. IMO.

Gothmog

(145,264 posts)
218. The JPR posters do not live in the real world
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:57 AM
Oct 2016

Some of their posts and threads are so far out there that they are funny

pampango

(24,692 posts)
191. They have gone from pro-Bernie to pro-Trump, pro-Putin with Bernie thrown under the bus.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 05:47 AM
Oct 2016

As with most forms of hatred, Hillary-hate has made nominally progressive posters (at least some of them) go down the dark road of 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'.

At first it seemed to be largely pro-Bernie and quite progressive which is fine. Then it seemed to morph into a pro-Green Party mindset. Again that's not bad, IMHO. But bitterness has driven them over the edge. It is now full of links to right wing sites and conspiracy theories and praise for Trump. Progressive media is treated with disdain while Drudge and Gateway Pundit are treated as 'truth tellers'. It feels like a far-right site like freeperville or Red State now.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
210. Many were Obama haters too...they are not and never were progressive
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:29 AM
Oct 2016

in my opinion. They posted vile stuff about Obama and because the could not get single payer and everything they claimed to want, they attacked him mercilessly.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
212. Lot of far-lefters started as and still are anti-Democrats,
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:34 AM
Oct 2016

though. For most of those, H is just the main focus of a constant hostility toward Democrats, especially mainstream liberals.

They're the type of far-lefter who is very emotionally involved in hating the generally moderately left Democratic Party--so much so that these people can't be bothered with worrying about other groups. (They're in addition, of course, to JPR conservatives who delight in the same hates.)

Rough quote from a social scientist who's studied the far left and far right: "The difference between the far right and the far left is that the far right hates everyone else and the far left hates itself."

calimary

(81,267 posts)
242. I wish I could feel kinder toward them. Or more sympathetic.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 11:29 AM
Oct 2016

But if they've just gone over to Trump, or just wanna hate on Hillary or kick our Bravenak around, well, that's quite different.

I'm already in trouble with one friend from Catholic school who chastises me for the way I feel about - well, shall we call 'em Trump jumpers? That I should be more understanding, and less judgmental, and all that.

Well, that's just too damn bad. I find myself standing firmly with the Rude Pundit on this one... NO sympathy for those who relentlessly and willfully refuse to open their eyes and/or their minds, despite any and all evidence to the contrary.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2016/10/yeah-sorry-but-fuck-donald-trumps.html

And I did find this, an article titled "Here's the One Frightening Psychological Characteristic that Online Trolls Tend to Share", which I found MOST instructive:

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/09/heres-the-one-the-one-frightening-psychological-characteristic-that-online-trolls-tend-to-share/

From the story:
The question for non-trolls is, behind the layer of protective anonymity, what lies at the core of the troll psyche. The findings of a few studies suggest that trolls who are mean-spirited and manipulative online have offline personalities to match, and that insecurity drives a fair amount of their trollery.

Case in point are two 2014 studies from Canada’s University of Manitoba that looked at the personalities of some 1,200 people who engage in trolling, which the researchers described as “behaving in a deceptive, destructive, or disruptive manner in a social setting on the internet” for seemingly no purpose at all. (The trolls would likely say they do it for the “lulz,” or laughs that come at another person’s expense.)

In the first study, participants were given tests measuring sadistic tendencies to get a feel for how much they enjoyed hurting other people. One a scale of 1 to 5, those surveyed were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with statements like, “hurting people is exciting’’ and, ‘‘I enjoy hurting people.’’ They were also posed questions that gauged their levels of psychopathy, and asked about fairly mundane things, like the amount of time they spend on the internet and their favorite online activities (with trolling given as one option). The second study “assessed trolling behavior, identification and enjoyment” along a rating scale, along with a few other things.
“Both studies revealed similar patterns of relations between trolling and the Dark Tetrad of personality: trolling correlated positively with sadism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism,” the researchers wrote. In other words, those who took part in trolling generally enjoyed watching others suffer, were pathologically self-absorbed and lacked “conscience and empathy.”

“Of all personality measures, sadism showed the most robust associations with trolling and, importantly, the relationship was specific to trolling behavior,” study authors note. “Enjoyment of other online activities, such as chatting and debating, was unrelated to sadism. Thus cyber-trolling appears to be an internet manifestation of everyday sadism… Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have fun… and the internet is their playground!”


Notice, too, the empathy thing here, in the last two paragraphs above. Remember who sneered and scoffed at the idea of empathy? This was back after John Kerry lost to bush/cheney in 2004 (under some questionable circumstances involving vote counting in Ohio, with Kenneth Blackwell - then Ohio's secretary of state and conveniently enough, chair of the state bush/cheney campaign - a male version of Florida's Katherine Harris from Selection 2000?). Answer: Dick Cheney.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
208. Many started out BOB but are now mostly Stein or Trump supporters...amazing how
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:25 AM
Oct 2016

many support Trump; they were never progressives,never true Bernie supporters and caused an enormous amount of trouble in the primary...good riddance.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
236. I can't see anybody over there, you sure?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 10:08 AM
Oct 2016



Your access to this site has been limited

Your access to this service has been temporarily limited. Please try again in a few minutes. (HTTP response code 503)

Reason: Manual block by administrator

Important note for site admins: If you are the administrator of this website note that your access has been limited because you broke one of the Wordfence firewall rules. The reason your access was limited is: "Manual block by administrator".

If this is a false positive, meaning that your access to your own site has been limited incorrectly, then you will need to regain access to your site, go to the Wordfence "options" page, go to the section for Rate Limiting Rules and disable the rule that caused you to be blocked. For example, if you were blocked because it was detected that you are a fake Google crawler, then disable the rule that blocks fake google crawlers. Or if you were blocked because you were accessing your site too quickly, then increase the number of accesses allowed per minute.

oldtime dfl_er

(6,931 posts)
65. Definition of misogyny:
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:54 AM
Oct 2016

misogyny
noun
1. hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women, or prejudice against women.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
8. Really is frightening how dim some people are.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:06 PM
Oct 2016

Many of them should be supervised and have their internet taken away.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
95. I think we need to take the idea very seriously
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:30 AM
Oct 2016

SS is no joke!!! Hell, I still suffer from it, but Auntie Hillary says Obamacare will help me.

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
146. Oh my goodness.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:54 AM
Oct 2016

I faintly remember a post or two about that topic. I can't remember all those details, my silly woman's mind has trouble with those things. So sorry for your suffering, brave.

To quote Barbara Bush:

Former First Lady Barbara Bush said of the war in Iraq: "Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? It's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"


It is okay, Auntie says you are covered. We will get others that are obviously suffering from TDS and JSDS the help they need. They will no longer suffer from Stockholm Syndrome, it will take time yet we will prevail. Therapy is good.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
149. It takes years :(
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:02 AM
Oct 2016

My recovery is assured though, thank you for your support. Though once the SS is gone, I will still be hysterical often, my hormones you know? I sometimes get sick and have my period at the same time, puts lives in danger. I worry for this world with all of us pussies running wild and voting. My uncle says these are the end times and his wife is acting all bold and doing what she wants to anytime she wants. He blames Hillary. I'm sure he's right, my aunt did early vote.

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
168. sigh~
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:30 AM
Oct 2016

I pray for your speedy recovery, I know many people in the past were so unsure of that. I have faith in you. I know you have one hell of a mind. I know you will make the right choices for you. YOU!

Dear, bravenak. Deep breath, shed the mantle of SS that has burdened you for so long, and go out and fucking vote! Vote for you. Vote for your future. Vote for the men that have been murdered and the babies that were left behind. Vote the past, Vote the future. BLM.

As you well know some of this was tongue in cheek. The rest was not. I stand with you.

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
186. I am thinking that too, bravenak.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:12 AM
Oct 2016

Well you know. I think us womens are going to vote us a Senate majority as well!

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
9. Fuck those worthless losers
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:09 PM
Oct 2016

Every single one of those assholes are worthless people

Not worth a minute of our time

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
11. Knock it off. Some of those "worthless losers" were good friends of mine for many years,
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:25 PM
Oct 2016

and good friends of many people here.

I am immensely saddened by the fact that they've chosen to leave DU, but I will never call them "worthless losers" or "assholes".

There is far too much free-floating hostility and denigration of others happening in our country these days, I do not care to add to it.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
37. Excuse me, let me get this straight.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:14 AM
Oct 2016

you want us to feel sorry for those posters who not only degrade our nominee but also take the part of Trump. Trump, who self confesses to serially sexually assaulting women. Who also is trying undermine our democratic system by alleging voter election fraud and using dog whistles to do it, these same posters have sat by while Trump is sowing this racial discontent. These posters are also taking Putin's side over the USA. I maybe a newbie, here at DU less than a year. But it seems to me that they are getting what they deserve.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
45. Where did I say that I wanted anyone to feel sorry for them?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:26 AM
Oct 2016

I said I was sad because some of the people there used to be my friends. I'm sad that they've gone down the path they've gone down, but I don't feel sorry for them - it was their choice.

The fact is, the only person I feel sorry for is me - because of the old friends I've lost.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
201. I wouldn't even call them friends anymore.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:04 AM
Oct 2016

They're outright unhinged-- In the same breath, Putin, Assange, Ecuador, Kerry, and MK-fucking-Ultra. They've gone full Alex Jones. Cut them out, forget.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
47. If their current actions merit it, then why shouldn't they be called out?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:29 AM
Oct 2016

If somebody is so pissed off that more people voted for Clinton than Sanders that they are happy to support not one, but two men who have committed sexual violence against women, then I don't see anything wrong with calling them assholes.

I'm not sure I'd be so eager to describe people who think sexual violence is okay as long as the person doing it is opposing Clinton on something would meet my standards for a "good friend", what with them not even qualifying as being good people.

still_one

(92,192 posts)
68. Some chose to leave because they couldn't use the "c" word, or other sexist slurs when referring to
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:56 AM
Oct 2016

Hillary.

The TOS were made very clear to anyone who wanted to remain a member. Those who chose not to remain members did so because they refused to abide by those TOS.

but it really comes down to this. This election is the election of a lifetime. The course of the Supreme Court will be decided for decades to come by the next President. If there were no other issues for the next president, that would be enough reason alone to vote for the Democratic nominee, and a good number of those who choose to leave did so because they refused to vote for the Democratic nominee



scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
76. I'm not defending those who chose to leave DU. All I said is that I'm sad to have lost old friends.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:06 AM
Oct 2016

And that I'm sick of name-calling.

still_one

(92,192 posts)
99. I know you are not defending those who chose to leave. It would have been nice if everyone had
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:36 AM
Oct 2016

toned it down a level. Maybe if the new TOS were implemented sooner things would have been different, but it is what it is.

I agree, name-calling is counter productive



Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
216. There were many Hillary supporters who are no longer here thanks
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:56 AM
Oct 2016

to the efforts of many who sit at Jackpines...so I hope they never come back. There is a difference between discussing issues and literally stalking people with the intention to get rid of them. I would like to add that I had a timeout that was my own fault and not associated with this. But people I knew for years were pushed out during the primary. Thank God the primary is over and the new rules are working well for all in my opinion.

still_one

(92,192 posts)
240. I know. I am well am aware of that, and those that were involved with those bullying
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 10:42 AM
Oct 2016

tactics, because that is what they were, are persona non grata, and they made this place a living hell for those of us who supported Hillary, and good riddance to them. I have nothing but disdain for them, and the fact that most of them threw Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and other progressives who supported Hillary under the proverbial bus, exposed them for who they were.

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
86. I agree
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:21 AM
Oct 2016

there was a lot of infighting on DU during the primary and things got pretty heated at times. To this day there are those who cannot say a kind word about Bernie supports which is a shame. I can understand why some chose to look for another venue and I will never do a Trump on anyone by calling them grade school names.

 

RonniePudding

(889 posts)
183. You're absolutely right, they're not idiots and losers
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:06 AM
Oct 2016

They are insufferable fuckwits. And I will be enjoying their crying immensely in a couple of weeks. To hell with them all.

obamanut2012

(26,077 posts)
196. Then you should ahve changed your friends
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 06:21 AM
Oct 2016

They always were horrible posters, and now are literally Fascists. They turned DU into a Hillary Hate site during teh Primaries, and silenced most of us, while good folks got canned.

No, we will not shut up about those haters and Fascists. Check yourself.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
202. You are entitled to your opinion, even when it's wrong.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:06 AM
Oct 2016

Your choice in friends casts suspicion on the quality of your judgement. JPR is staffed by and filled with right-wing dirt bags, and it's not new behavior on their part. Maybe you chose hot to notice, and want to continue doing that, but the rest of us aren't going to bury our heads in the sand the same way.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
211. Read their posts.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:33 AM
Oct 2016

They add to the hatred. And many have bragged about how they 'got rid of Hillary supporters' at DU. I have no use for any person who is voting for Trump directly or via Stein. It says something about their character or lack- there- of. Also, they trash this site on a regular basis. And those who have posting privileges still try to stir up trouble...including the 'be nice to greens' and many of the 'concern' posts.

Gothmog

(145,264 posts)
224. Many of the JPR types are now supporting trump and Russia
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:01 AM
Oct 2016

Many of the JPR posters were never democrats and never supported the Democratic Party. I am glad that they left

nini

(16,672 posts)
241. Your last sentence..................
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 10:48 AM
Oct 2016

'There is far too much free-floating hostility and denigration of others happening in our country these days, I do not care to add to it.'

Have you seen what they post over there? Yet you are defending that with those asshats. Can't have it both ways.

If they simply left to go somewhere else that's one thing but the vomit they are spewing over there is disgusting and quite frankly unhinged.

Maybe they do need you as their friend - they need someone to make sure they don't implode on Nov 8.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
282. I am not defending them. Sheesh! All I said was that I'm sad to have lost old friends.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:26 PM
Oct 2016

I've only gone over to JPR twice - once when it was first started - and I knew I wanted nothing to do with it - and then yesterday when I followed bravenak's link.

I have no interest in that place. I found it totally offensive from the get-go because they named it after a wonderful DUer who was deceased and had no say in their exploitation of his good name. He was a very enthusiastic Bernie supporter, but I'm quite sure that he would NEVER have agreed with the rabid Hilary hate that was making DU so awful.

You know, I've been on DU for over 15 years. Over those years I have made many good friends, and there are lots of them who are no longer here. Some were lost through death (too damn many!), some were lost because they've simply moved on and lost interest in DU, and some were lost because they have become "unhinged". Those are all different ways of losing friends. And every loss, no matter the cause, saddens me, that's just how I am.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
248. And now they've dropped the "both parties are bad" pretense and gone full Trump
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:15 PM
Oct 2016

Sorry for your loss, but fuck them.

dflprincess

(28,078 posts)
301. Thank you
Thu Oct 20, 2016, 10:46 PM
Oct 2016

I'll admit I had high hopes for the site when it started and I did join it. I was shocked by how quickly it deteriorated and I'm glad I never donated.

I check it out once in while but less frequently and I've noticed fewer and fewer posts by those who tried to be reasonable (and by reasonable I mean, still support Bernie's positions and are with him on who to vote for.)

Cha

(297,244 posts)
88. I just saw you on another
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:22 AM
Oct 2016

post. lol

I see we're all hangin' in there.. doin' what we do best for democracy, flea!

I thought of you the other day when I posted this from Oregon..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512512718

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
74. A few decent people post in both places
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:06 AM
Oct 2016

But largely that site's membership is a bunch of dirtbags

Response to bravenak (Original post)

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
14. RW sites have been discussed on DU ...
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:26 PM
Oct 2016

... since day one. And that's what JPR has become - and we're free to discuss it.

I don't see DUers referring to discussions about Freeperville as "stirring up shit". Why should JPR be treated differently?


yodermon

(6,143 posts)
41. because "the left" and "the right" are not equal and opposite evil forces to your wonderful center.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:16 AM
Oct 2016

it's very simplistic to reduce it to that binary state.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
59. No not the same in ideology - they simply exhibit the same behavior...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:50 AM
Oct 2016

... in support of their chosen ideology. They are all "true believers" - read the book.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
63. The tactics of those
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:52 AM
Oct 2016

on both fringes are similar, though. Like the denizens of sites such as Free Republic and InfoWars, these people are hostile towards anyone who doesn't walk lock-step with their political views. Both crowds loathe Hillary Clinton and those of us who support her, they bear resentment towards the Democratic Party, they believe in some of the wildest political conspiracies, and they're acting as if they'd rather have Trump win than endure 4 years of a Hillary Clinton administration. It's one thing to be a liberal or a conservative, but it's another to be totally unreasonable and pout about not getting one's way.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
75. JPR pushes RW talking points ...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:06 AM
Oct 2016

... 24/7, quotes Brietbart and other RW sources, links to RW sites, praises RW authors/bloggers, etc.

There is nothing "left" or "progressive" about any of it. JPR has become a RW site. It certainly didn't intend to be that when it started - but it is nevertheless what it's become.

I check JPR every morning to find out what the RW is up to. I am never disappointed in that regard. Whatever the RW sites are spewing that day, JPR is spewing it as well.

That's not simplistic - it's just a fact. When a website is full of RW bullshit to the exclusion of all else, it's a RW site.


 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
85. They support Trump and pimp O'Keefe and Breitbart
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:19 AM
Oct 2016

They are rightwingers and the enemy.

They're also racists and misogynists.

womanofthehills

(8,710 posts)
260. I see some of the pro Monsanto people over there loving Trump
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:56 PM
Oct 2016

They also name themselves something that sounds progressive when they really are racists and misogynists like you said.

In my small town - some Trump people registered Dem for the primary just to vote against Hillary.

Hekate

(90,692 posts)
22. Sorry if you feel your friends over there got dissed, but their names were not even used...
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:40 PM
Oct 2016

Whereas you felt compelled to call out Bravenak by name.

Why?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
43. This op was the least offensive I could find on the subject
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:24 AM
Oct 2016

Just the tweet, no more! But my oh my, the things folks read into that one tweet!!! Amazing shit!

womanofthehills

(8,710 posts)
131. They have gone insane over there
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:35 AM
Oct 2016

Some forums:

This Could Be a bombshell — Vince Foster affair with HRC

Oh my… The National Enquirer tomorrow will be hot
Hillary Fixer Breaks Ranks: I Arranged Sex Trysts For Her — With Men & WOMEN
PLUS more stunning revelations from the Clintons’ bag man!

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
136. The 90s called, they want their Clinton conspiracy theories back.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:46 AM
Oct 2016

Maybe they'll think up new ones once Hillary is president? That would at least be something a little different.

Cha

(297,244 posts)
34. Oh, so we're not allowed to see what a rwing site is doing to support
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:11 AM
Oct 2016

trump?

That against your rules, is it?

Response to Post removed (Reply #10)

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
162. Talking is fun.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:20 AM
Oct 2016

I can only take so much reading. Makes me feel more human when I'm relaxing & conversing.

We're discussing people who used to post here. Many of whom we spoke with and argued with. Some were friendly with them. Some express dismay. A natural feeling. Some are surprised that some of them are supporting Donald Trump for president. Some, like me, are not.

Human nature. Plenty of others are conversing on this thread. It interests us. Even if it doesn't interest you.

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
23. It's as if the Republican party doesn't exist over there.
Tue Oct 18, 2016, 11:43 PM
Oct 2016

Trump and Putin are the nice ones while mild-mannered Democrats like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are the raving Nazis. Oh well, they'll have a very happy eight years getting high every day on panic about the Illuminati Clinton Administration. Cheers, losers!

Jason1961

(413 posts)
36. Someone tell the Primary is over
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:14 AM
Oct 2016

They need to grow up, it's past time to move on and support Hillary.

Bernie lost, hard to accept when your candidate doesn't win the primary but if they think they can punish us by electing Trump they're sadly mistaken.

I can't wait to see them eat crow once Hillary wins AGAIN.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
46. Nothing we can do to stop this
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:26 AM
Oct 2016

Just watch. And on election night we can check back to see how they handle it. I bet it's better than Kkkarl Rove making Megyn Kelly run down to the counting room on the Night Mitt Lost America.

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
48. And I love how they've whipped out their magnifying glasses and Sherlock Holmes hats
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:33 AM
Oct 2016

to carefully read all the Clinton emails, desperate for something bad, anything bad, there MUST BE BAD ELITE THIRD-WAY THINGS THERE MUST.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
58. Right?!?!!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:49 AM
Oct 2016

The want to ignore admitted rape/sexual assault to harass folks about Podesta's emails

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
173. What's hilarious about that too
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:40 AM
Oct 2016

is that pretty much everyone is saying that Clinton & Podesta were surprisingly similar in their private emails & speeches as they are in their public ones. I like people who are consistent & not two-faced.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
49. They actually hide posts over there!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:33 AM
Oct 2016

I saw several "Content removed for violations of the community standards & guidelines" You gotta wonder what post would be so bad that they had to remove it from that shit hole site.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
52. It was the crazy National Enq. shit that got hidden
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:35 AM
Oct 2016

Which is actually kinda nice. But then they let other even crazier shit stay right up. Just dont get the logic. Makes no sense.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
50. I joined last December
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:34 AM
Oct 2016

Right before things went crazy here. I almost left.

But you were one of the first to call these folks out for their rhetoric. And you really paid an on-line price! I suspect you really did not care!! And while I may think you went a little to far, or perhaps way to far, you have been proven correct.

Turns out there were many trolls here who were not only misogynist but at the end of the day not comfortable with a Black Man as president.

And I can't believe that there are still people here defending JPR exiles as good people and lamenting their exit. Any honest progressive, liberal or even moderate who spends even 10 minutes over there will see they are in the sewer. Misogynist and racist. Hell, most of the poster support Trump. I could give a god-damn for any active member over there. Hell, I respect republicans more because they are honest with their hatred.

The sad thing is that they will be back. They can't help themselves. But not in their old names. After the election you will see a whole lot of new members joining who seem to know the lingo and immediately begin attacking Hillary for various and sundry reasons.

I hope you have a very nice evening.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
56. Ahh! You witnessed my fall from grace in real time.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:45 AM
Oct 2016

Must have been nutso to see what was going on. Sure, I have a big mouth and should have kept a whole lot more of my observations to myself, but I was shocked at how folks I had really liked got on the bandwagon and lost the ability to self correct or be corrected or even be told they are offensive and maybe care a bit.

I knew they were going to support Trump. Hillary is a woman and they judge her a billion times more harshly because they are unsatisfied with self. I believe it was my predicting their next move as they were making the previous move that enraged them to no end. Felt like I was FORCING them, 'egging them on' and I must be internet destroyed to salvage their self perceptions as the leftiest leftist lefties and super intersectional best people ever.


But anyone with a memory and a bit of honesty knows that this started when us angry blacks had the nerve never nerve to be insufficiently grateful to them and demand a voice in this election. It started a few years back when I posted about the demographic timebomb looming. It would have happened regardless of who ran. This has been a fucking interesting few years.

JustAnotherGen

(31,824 posts)
231. You are spot on with this
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:09 AM
Oct 2016


The sad thing is that they will be back. They can't help themselves. But not in their old names. After the election you will see a whole lot of new members joining who seem to know the lingo and immediately begin attacking Hillary for various and sundry reasons.



Since you witnessed a lot of the nonsense - what'cha think? Think they are going to get paid by Alex Jones to post here?

All of those accusations about folks being 'Paid Hillary Posters' was nonsense and they knew it. But maybe it wasn't. Maybe they know something we don't know - but it ain't Hillary or the Democratic party paying people to post here.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
235. I had forgotten that
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 10:04 AM
Oct 2016

Oh, on a side note; have you received your Christmas party invite from David Brock?

JustAnotherGen

(31,824 posts)
245. Nope - I quit
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:02 PM
Oct 2016

Know why? She shorted me 2 cents my last paycheck.

It's $500 per post. That week I should have received $25K pre tax. I did the math. Brook only cut a check for $24,999.98

*hmph* So I quit the cheap bastards!

Now I post for Phil Murphy. He's running for Governor in NJ next year. Ka ching!

Response to bravenak (Original post)

Response to bravenak (Reply #62)

Response to bravenak (Reply #67)

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
70. Oh dear, I'm shocked!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:00 AM
Oct 2016


Reads like your source was egging him on.

You're really something if you will post someone's private messages. I'm sure that you are proud of yourself, but I'm not.

Response to CajunBlazer (Reply #70)

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
128. The stalkers are here?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:33 AM
Oct 2016

Bless there hearts.

Ouch, saw a few screen shots. They use to be our....



Friends.

Sad they have to be so nasty.

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
157. You period. No wonder you posted these bloody facts.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:15 AM
Oct 2016


Lol~ I read a comment the other day that women are to irrational during their "time" therefore should never be President.

Well since they think she still gets her period at 68, maybe they should be more concerned that we will have the first woman President deliver when she is in office.

Woot! That would freak them out!
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
161. She is fantastic!!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:20 AM
Oct 2016

She can do anything, it's obvious they really are scared of how much she will get done. If she had a baby in office? Omg, I'd enjoy that shit immensely! Breast feedings in the Rose Garden, at functions, on air force one? I feel my misandry rising, hold me back!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
239. What leads you to intentionally conflate benign interest with importance?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 10:38 AM
Oct 2016

What leads you to intentionally conflate a benign interest and simple bemusement with importance?

Response to bravenak (Original post)

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
103. It seems the JPR has morphed into a 100% anti progressive site
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:44 AM
Oct 2016

dedicated to Trumped up charges and conspiracies Drudged up from the past

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
105. The thing about JPR ...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:46 AM
Oct 2016

... is that they all believe that there is a vast, world-wide conspiracy in play - and everyone is "in on it" except them.

Bernie endorsed HRC - he's "in on it".

HRC stole the election - and every election worker in every state she won is "in on it".

Liz Warren, Al Franken, John Lewis, Howard Dean - anyone who supported/endorsed HRC is "in on it".

And they just keep adding to the list. Every time someone says anything remotely positive about HRC or the Dem Party, it's because they're "in on it".

They keep screaming that Bernie won the primaries, and it was "stolen" from him - and wonder why people like Warren are going along with it and keeping their mouths shut. It never occurs to them that no one is talking about the primary being stolen because it wasn't. They just keep insisting it was, and everyone who says different is "in on it".

They talk about Hillary's "obvious crimes" and "illegal activities". They can't understand why no one is speaking up about them. Again, it doesn't occur to them that no one is speaking up because there are no "crimes" or "illegal activities" to be spoken about. They'd rather believe that everyone is covering-up Hill's many crimes because they're all "in on it".

JPR is a case study of how the easily-led ARE easily led. The combination of conspiracy theories and paranoia is a potent mix for people desperate to believe that they "know" what's really going on - and anyone who doesn't buy their schtick is "in on" the conspiracy to silence them.

It's cult-like behaviour - and they are downing the kool-aid faster than you can say "Jonestown".






 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
107. Fuck yeah
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:49 AM
Oct 2016

I try not to look, really, I try hard! But I keep going back to see what the RIGHTWING has to say without actually going to Freeperville. But there are times, many many times, that the same damn 'news' pops up at both places damn near simultaneously. Strange that.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
115. JPR has been ...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:02 AM
Oct 2016

... my go-to site for RW talking points for months. Much easier to navigate than FreeRepublic, and I can get the down-low on what RWers are saying.

I can't even remember the last time I saw a RW talking point that wasn't being promoted on JPR. It's ALL there - all day, every day.

I think JPR was infiltrated by RWers from day one - and as long as they presented as anti-HRC/anti-Dem, they were accepted as being disgruntled Bernie supporters. But the fact is the RWers have taken over the site, and the True Progressives (TM) are too dumb to realize it.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
125. I think they took most of our rightwinger with them when they left
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:23 AM
Oct 2016

Easy to blend in for them, so no big surprise. I find it odd that folks are angry at my reporting on their reactions to the news that Assange has no internet.

But you are right. Much easier to navigate than most rightwing sites, helps me fight the rightwing new straight away. And their rightwing new search feature is a god send. Just type in a ame or term and voila! All the day's rightwing headlines at your fungertips! Really time saving. Helps me keep my fingers on the pulse of Trumpville.

They even have photo thread where they add poop to the back of Democratic Women's skirts to make it look like they pooped themself! So mature and liberal. Anybody with any stabdards has left there already and those who have not are either trying to make it work, trying to keep friendships, or just plain strange. Honestly, they must like their name as the new up and coming rightwing CT site else they'd change.

I honestly feel bad for folks who kinda miss some of them. But those people are just not the same as they were. Supporting Trump changes folks. As does hating Hillary. I want to write a book called "Hating Hillary: An Internet Tale" about this season but I am lazy. I need somebody to make me submit chapters to them an then I'd get something done. Bet it would sell.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
141. I'd have to decide which stuff to put in
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:50 AM
Oct 2016

No matter what somebody will be mad that their thing did not make it in. I might just do it though. It needs doing.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
152. So true.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:04 AM
Oct 2016

Thing is when the Bernie supporters were pretty much running DU because they were 85% of the site, they accepted anyone who was anti-HRC as "one of their own". They never looked beyond that.

Now they're doing the same thing at JPR - they accept anyone who is anti-HRC/anti-Dem as being one of them. The RW talking points then became acceptable, because they were coming from people who were "on their side".

It's been fascinating to watch how easily led people can be.



NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
163. Well, they're "informed" enough to KNOW ...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:21 AM
Oct 2016

... that HRC is actually sinking in every poll, that Bernie only endorsed HRC after being beaten by Clinton Goons wearing brass knuckles, and that Hill is dying of at least a dozen diseases.

Why is no one else talking about this? Because they're all "in on it".

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
166. Of course they are!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:24 AM
Oct 2016

Did you not see the scratches on his face where she personally attacked him with her talons? Nobody said shit and he just let her abuse him.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
174. Even as we speak ...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:40 AM
Oct 2016

... they've come up with a new RW meme!

"The Obama State Department asked the FBI to phony up the emails marked confidential so the emails were consistent with Hillary’s story. In return, the FBI would get some juicy overseas slots."

Where is this gem from? "American Thinker", a RW daily online magazine. And they're eating it up!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
178. Of course!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:52 AM
Oct 2016

Every Breitbart, kookoo conspiracy finds it's way there almost immediately. It's like their reading the words as the rightwinger types them in, basically reading their minds. Or they are the very rightwingers that write that shit. That was one massive troll they pukled off though. Took sustained effort.

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
180. RW talking points.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:56 AM
Oct 2016

That is the prerequisite to be a member at JPR. You also must use the C word against Hillary daily and use it in every way, or you will be fined.

However there is a rule that WILL BE ENFORSED. You never call another member the C word at JPR. Ever. Never. If you do, and the goddesses is my witness an Admin said this, you will be banned. I know the Admin, I can see their avatar as I post. They said it.

How do you spell fucking misogynistic hypocrite?

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
110. So, you had to go over there
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:53 AM
Oct 2016

....and drag back all the mockery of them you could? Really?

Not everything at jpr is as you say. Must have taken quite a lot of your time to find the most foolish statements you could, if these are exact quotes.

Seems petty and gloating. I remember Skinner saying "try not be sore winners".



 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
113. It took negative thirty seconds to find something foolish
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:58 AM
Oct 2016

It took more time to find something less foolish, because the other shit is unpostable here. You're welcome.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
120. Some of the people
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:11 AM
Oct 2016

…..at jpr were long, long time Du-ers. What's the point of going out of your way even for 30 seconds?

It's beneath what DU is trying to be to go over there and trawl amongst them.

But okay—that's you. I get it.




 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
123. I didn't name any names, I just posted the reaction to 'Assange has not internet'
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:14 AM
Oct 2016

If the reaction are over the top, you can tell them yourself if you care. I Will do as I please. You do you, boo boo. Do you.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
204. You're on a soapbox about "what DU should be" even as your membership there has been revealed?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:15 AM
Oct 2016

Wow, thanks for the laughs. So, so many laughs.


 

randome

(34,845 posts)
222. What is JPR trying to accomplish? Airing every conspiracy theory they can come up with?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:59 AM
Oct 2016

Some of us are glad imbeciles like MannyGoldstein are gone from here.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.
[/center][/font][hr]

Cha

(297,244 posts)
116. Yeah, she did.. they're advocating for trump And, you're excusing
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:06 AM
Oct 2016

them.

There's nothing "petty or gloating" about pointing out the idiocy of pumping up a sexual predator for potus and twisting themselves into knots.. over Hillary.

It's a damn PSA. So glad they have their own little site to whine about Hillary and aren't around here anymore.

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
122. It takes no time at all, it's a vending machine of stupid.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:12 AM
Oct 2016

Put in your coins, click most any link there, out tumbles foolishness. Done.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
143. "A vending machine of stupid."
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:51 AM
Oct 2016

That is a BRILLIANT summation!!! There literally isn't a thread there that doesn't reek of stupid.

My personal faves are the comments about HRC's health. Apparently she's dying of Parkinson's
/Alzheimer's/epilepsy/et al, walks around in a full body brace because she can't stand upright, and uses a body double to do campaign events because she's too sick to attend.

They actually BELIEVE this stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
148. Yeah, they were posting close-ups of her pants and insisting metal bolts fell out
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:01 AM
Oct 2016

because her body brace broke, and that folds in her pants indicated a pee bag (forget what they're called). Right this second there are some of them combing those emails looking for evidence of the health problems that will bring her down, finally.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
155. I know - can you believe people are THAT gullible?
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:10 AM
Oct 2016

Apparently no one who posts there has ever actually seen someone walk with just a leg brace, no less a full-body brace. They've also never known anyone with any of the diseases they insist Hillary is dying of.

They even insisted that the "Hillary Shimmy" at the debate was actually a seizure!

Well, stupid is as stupid posts.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
280. For real!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:47 PM
Oct 2016

That story is mild compared to some of the other CTs. One of them involved Hillary giving a campaign speech from her bedroom (being too sickly to go outside) against a blue screen, her image later being superimposed in a video in front of a crowd.

The "crowd" of course were all HRC staffers, sworn to secrecy about the fact that she wasn't really there.

And then there's the body-double story, whereby someone who looks, acts and sounds just like HRC has actually been the one giving speeches on the campaign trail.

Did you know that Obama is planning to declare war on Russia as a "distraction" from the news - which will be breaking any minute now - that he has master-minded and overseen massive cover-ups of Hill's crimes?

Alex Jones is an amateur compared to the lunatics on JPR.

Response to zentrum (Reply #110)

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
203. Lol, active JPR member exposed!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:12 AM
Oct 2016

So hilarious when some people are not smart enough to use a different username when they join a hate-site like that.

obamanut2012

(26,077 posts)
253. Oh, everything totally is as the OP says
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:36 PM
Oct 2016

And, Skinner meant to other legit DUers, not to Trump supporters.

Response to bravenak (Original post)

Response to bravenak (Original post)

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
121. More comic relief.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:11 AM
Oct 2016

It cracks me up when one of them declares 'I refuse to choose between the lesser of two evils.' As though it's a brilliant thought, or effective strategy.

Never mind that they can choose among the lesser of four or five evils. Or that all voting involves those choices. Unless they believe some supreme benevolent leader can override congress and the courts and other voters on every matter of significance to them.

Cha

(297,244 posts)
135. Right. They will NOT Stop US.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:42 AM
Oct 2016

Anybody who supports trump is fair game.. it's so "ridiculous" as Sarah Silverman would say.

It's dead serious but I take the Seth Meyers and Trevor Noah route.

sheshe2

(83,771 posts)
184. OMG OMG OMG
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:07 AM
Oct 2016

Not going back there....

Did they say it was Hillary?

Lol~ I kid. I know the Enquirer nor JPR would say stuff like that!

Response to bravenak (Original post)

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
198. That site's "about us" page is REALLY REALLY REALLY out of date.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 07:02 AM
Oct 2016

Apparently they still think that Bernie Sanders is going to be the president!

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
213. The thing that upsets me the most...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 AM
Oct 2016

Is that these folks should fucking know better. They have given in to base emotion, accepting anything, even from far-right nutty sources to feed an irrational hate of HRC. And they have somehow managed to convince themselves that Donald "Pussy-grabber" Trump is somehow better.

Of course, I think the site is no probably 60% right-wing trolls. It is kind of amusing that they are trolling each other. But there are some supposed "progressives" lapping that shit up too.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
217. That is the maddening thing to me too
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:57 AM
Oct 2016

How the fuck did they convince themselves that Hillary was the archetype of evil and come to support TRUMP? WTF? I was actually hoping for a while that they would turn things around and move forward. Sad to see them go out like that.

Gothmog

(145,264 posts)
215. The JPR posters are sad people who believe any and all conspiracy theories
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:55 AM
Oct 2016

I enjoy reading that board just to laugh at the silly and dumb conspriacy theories

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
225. Don't be
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:02 AM
Oct 2016

It started out to support Bernie. Makes sense to have joined. It has devolved and most with sense have left there.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
229. Yeah, I joined because they had a lot of pro-Bernie stuff.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:06 AM
Oct 2016

After Bernie conceded and endorsed Clinton it went to shit.

brer cat

(24,565 posts)
226. You live up to your name
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:03 AM
Oct 2016

every time you wade into that cesspool to keep us informed. You also post the most entertaining threads! Love you, girl...keep it up!

brer cat

(24,565 posts)
233. We could have a bake sale
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:34 AM
Oct 2016

to buy you a hazmat suit! I'll make something chocolate with lots of nuts. That will give you courage, strength, and stamina. Never underestimate the power of chocolate and nuts if consumed by a woman on a mission!

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
246. You deserve it!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:20 PM
Oct 2016

You're living up to your name, bravenak. You go to JPR so we don't have to.

As for hazard pay, how about a hot fudge sundae instead? Or a beer?

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
230. Everybody on that site represented the worst of DU.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 09:09 AM
Oct 2016

Conspiracy theorists,MRA supporters,pro Russia loonies and freepers posing as progressives,DU should be happy they aren't stinking up this place anymore.

Response to bravenak (Original post)

MineralMan

(146,313 posts)
258. On November 9, some of the posters there
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:45 PM
Oct 2016

will return to DU. A few are banned here, but most are not. I have visited JPR as a reader a few times, and recognize many of the screen names there, at least those who have not changed them.

Some number of them are people who "held Obama's feet to the fire," starting on the day after the election in 2008. Some never had a single good word to post about President Obama. Some of those will return to DU on November 9 and will begin to "hold Hillary's feet to the fire" in much the same way.

In my opinion, though, they have openly revealed themselves as people who are really not about helping a Democratic administration get the most possible done that is progressive. In this election campaign, I've seen more clearly what some of them are about.

They'll be back on DU soon, "holding Hillary's feet to the fire." I'm not going to be listening, though. I'll recognize them and simply not visit their threads. They will, once again, not be about helping our new President succeed. That's not their goal at all.

It's too damned bad, I think. But they will be back shortly and resuming their posting here.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
264. I've noted this phenomenon...this tendency to scurry back under the tent flaps
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:30 PM
Oct 2016

in other threads, and I suggest a different approach.

This time, we simply do not cede the ground. Not November 9, or any day after.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
267. I expect to use the subject line
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:40 PM
Oct 2016

"^^^^supported Trump in the general election^^^^" accompanied by links for those who pretend to be advocating for progressivism here after joining forces with David Duke in the general election.

fifthoffive

(382 posts)
261. Haven't been there in a while.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:59 PM
Oct 2016

Been a member here a long time, but don't post often.

I was a Bernie supporter, and was saddened by the vitriol flowing both ways on DU during the primary season. Gave JPR a look, but it soon became clear there was a lot of delusion amongst the disappointed and gave up on it fairly quickly.

Sorry to hear it's only gotten worse. Hopefully the fever will break after the election and some will come to their senses. I'm afraid a cure before the election is a pipe dream.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,173 posts)
265. Here you can't whisper anyting bad about Hillary
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:34 PM
Oct 2016

There you can't whisper anything good about Hillary.

sigh.


A lot of good people went there, including myself, after it was looking like Bernie lost, and even before Hillary was announced officially the nominee, we were censored from promoting Bernie or his ideas. Or criticize the process. This despite the proven charges that DWS was working behind the scenes to smear Bernie. I just wish more on here would be sympathetic to the anger and disappointment that caused.

I miss posters like Sabrina who is a fighter and always had something great to say. I miss a lot of posters who made this a place to discuss diverse opinion within our supposedly big tent.

Yes there are extremist idiots on JPR that are perfectly happy to burn down the country thinking it will all be for the best. Including a lot of new trolls that wouldn't last a day on DU. But I think there are many that see DU now as a hostile place for anyone who has even the slightest disagreement with the direction of the party. And this kind of piling on in this thread does not help.

I hope after the election that the more brighter ones come back. Many already have I suspect, especially after Bernie publicly endorsed Hillary and implored his supporters to vote for Hillary. I am one. So just remember that many Bernie supporters are still here. I just hope this place can go back to bravely discussing all political viewpoints, even the ones that make the status quo uncomfortable.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
266. the vast majority of Bernie supporters have lined up behind
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:37 PM
Oct 2016

Hillary for a variety of reasons, basically because they know what time it is.

Sabrina is a Trump supporter now--still want her to come back here? My take is that all of those who took the same side as David Duke, Ralph Reed, and Jeff Sessions during the general election should never, ever, ever, ever come back here, and if they do, they should be shunned.

Not all enemies are traitors, but all traitors are enemies.

There will be at least 4 years to criticize Clinton. It's pretty simple, during general election season it's only who are playing for our team here. Not Evan McMullin voters. Not Gary Johnson voters. Not Jill Stein voters. And for goodness sake no Trumpholes.



NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
275. Let's be clear.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:14 PM
Oct 2016

Bernie supporters were never censored for promoting Bernie or his ideas. Those now at JPR fled DU because once Hillary was the nominee, they couldn’t continue to bash her. For many of them, that was the only reason for being here in the first place. So they went to a site where they could post anti-HRC/anti-Dem bullshit all day long.

”I think there are many that see DU now as a hostile place for anyone who has even the slightest disagreement with the direction of the party. And this kind of piling on in this thread does not help.”

Their idea of voicing a “slight disagreement with the party” is to accuse Democrats who didn’t support Bernie of being corrupt sell-outs – a list which includes Obama, John Lewis, Liz Warren, Howard Dean, Al Franken, and many, many more. As we can see by browsing JPR, they continue to spew their hatred of Democrats and the party as a whole.

The reason people are “piling on” in this thread is because the hostile, vitriolic environment directly caused by those former DU posters who are now at JPR has almost completely disappeared since they left. Many of us – I would even venture to say most of us – do not want them back. It has been a joy to post here again knowing that we can actually support our (D) candidates, without being told that we have our heads up our asses because we refuse to see how totally corrupt our candidates and our party actually are.

During the primaries, 85% of DU posters were Bernie supporters, which meant they were 85% of the jury pool. A lot of long-time DUers left after having their posts repeatedly alerted on, juried, and hidden while, at the same time, some of the most vile things posted by Bernie supporters were left to stand. So spare me the “many see DU as a hostile place” speech – when it came to making DU a “hostile place”, many now at JPR were expert at promoting hostility at every turn.

Yes, many Bernie supporters are still here – they’re HRC supporters now. They are standing with our nominee and our party, in the same way we HRC supporters would have stood with Bernie had he been the nominee.

I am a Democrat. I have no interest in welcoming back people who are supporting a racist misogynist like Trump, who have accused Democrats of “stealing” the election from Bernie, who spew RW talking points on a daily basis, and who insist that the Clintons have murdered dozens of their political adversaries.

They can keep that shit on their own site, and wallow in it to their heart’s content.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
278. This of course
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:37 PM
Oct 2016

And now, lo and behold, one can speak their mind without the dreaded

" you have DU mail....one of your posts was hidden"

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
281. Really.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:53 PM
Oct 2016

It became almost a daily occurrence for some people - which is why many of them left DU and never returned.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,173 posts)
285. As clear as an unmuddied lake
Thu Oct 20, 2016, 02:05 AM
Oct 2016

There was a lot of bad mouthing going on on both sides during the primaries.

Bernie people had to deflect all kinds of invented smeers like he didn't care about black Americans concerns, and if those didn't work DWS had a few more up her sleeve it turns out. In here he was spoken as living in a fantasy with his whacky single payer ideas, free tuition, and how dare he stretch out pushing his own plan for the country all the way to the DNConvention! We were all Bernie Bros. I guess we transcended gender.

And the Bernie supporters faux pas was not to invent new ugly smeers, but simply to remind people of events and decisions that she herself made in the past. We are not fighting the primary now, but those questions were important to ask, but it made some uncomfortable. Many times all we got back were personal insults.

And on top of all that, as you admit, 85%, although I'd say you are being a little generous, were Bernie supporters. And you infer that this 85% were unfairly censoring Hilary supporters posts with jurys? First off you do not know that, and second it could be explained in that out of proportion balance of supporters.

My point was that politics, like personalities, are never seen as, in reality black or white. I joined JPR as a knee jerk need for solace, but find it more and more ugly. I think it is being infiltrated by a lot of outside Trump supporters. Many of that large percent of Bernie supporters here tried it out. Some still post on both sites. Political views are meant to be shared.

But I do agree that this is not the time for giving the Republicans and Donny any ammunition. We are all together for Hillary. Trump must be stopped. Its unproductive to drag up the past at some point, it becomes more about looking forward and both supporting when deserved and holding feet to the fire also during the next few years.

But I still maintain that there are a lot of intelligent people that should come back hopefully, minus the right wing trolls, and be a part of the discussion. It would make for a richer environment of ideas.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
286. The 85% Bernie supporters number ...
Thu Oct 20, 2016, 03:44 AM
Oct 2016

... comes from Skinner - who is probably in a position to know such things.

The "there was bad-mouthing on both sides" argument doesn't wash. When 85% of jurors are adjudicating what the other 15% are posting, the end result is obvious.

I do not want to engage in discussion with people who are now advocating for Trump, nor those who insist the election was "stolen" from Bernie, nor those who consider Breitbart, FOX-News, and James O'Keefe(!) to be reliable news sources.

If discussing politics with such people is your idea of "a richer environment of ideas", that's your prerogative. I don't.

You seem to be ignoring the fact that what gets posted on JPR is open to anyone who wants to see it. We KNOW who these people are, we KNOW what they've said. That's why a LOT of us don't want them back here. The "True Progressive (TM)" masks came off a long time ago.

As I've said, let them spew their bullshit on their own site. There's no reason to let them drag it back here. They add nothing of substance to the discussion.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
268. Usually DU burn boards are amusing, but that one is just tragic.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:43 PM
Oct 2016

It's like Alex Jones had hundreds of little spider babies.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
272. Hi, brave.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 05:41 PM
Oct 2016

Still the most intrepid sister warrior I know. I always picture places like that to be the swamps in the original Zelda game. Just wade in and slap slimes and monsters. You get mega points.

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
288. And after the election when returning/reincarnated trolls/Democrat-haters return,
Thu Oct 20, 2016, 04:20 AM
Oct 2016

I hope that all of us who know them for what they are will be believed, not called "rah rah cheerleaders" who don't want to "hold Democrats' feet to the fire" and want to "shut down discussion" and so on. We've been through this too many times.

Demsrule86

(68,576 posts)
297. The feet to the fire crowd allows the GOP to win mid-term elections
Thu Oct 20, 2016, 09:14 AM
Oct 2016

by demoralizing and suppressing Democratic votes...any who do this are suspect in my opinion and not Democrats. I think we have seen their true colors during the primary and at JPR...had we supported our president in 10, it would have been much better for progressives and for the country.

Response to bravenak (Original post)

betsuni

(25,531 posts)
291. Oh honey, nobody cares because those JPR trolls are perfectly described as terrible liars.
Thu Oct 20, 2016, 04:53 AM
Oct 2016

Time for beddy-boo, no?

Response to betsuni (Reply #291)

Response to bravenak (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So I headed over to JPR t...