Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,993 posts)
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:14 AM Oct 2016

Politico: Confessions of a Trump Fact-Checker

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/one-month-253-trump-untruths-214369

I’m now spending much of my time immersed in Trump’s dishonesty. I’m the Washington correspondent for Canada’s Toronto Star newspaper, and since September 15, I’ve published a daily tally—or as close to a daily tally as I can produce while also sleeping occasionally—of every false claim the Republican presidential candidate has uttered in a speech or interview. At the end of each day or the beginning of the next, I tweet a screenshot of the list, then publish it on our website, thestar.com.

The fewest inaccuracies I’ve heard in any day is four. The most is 25. (Twenty-five!) That doesn’t include the first two debates, at which I counted 34 and 33, respectively. Over the course of 33 days, I counted a total of 253 (including some that repeat).

I’m not doing anything particularly innovative with what I call #TrumpCheck. Trump has been dutifully fact-checked all campaign by several others, including Politifact and the Washington Post’s excellent Glenn Kessler and Michelle Ye Hee Lee. American readers who have bitterly joked that America’s fact-checking has been outsourced to Canada are far too hard on their own journalists. Some of each list I make borrows from the analysis of Americans.

What I’m doing differently, though, is keeping count. Because I think the count is a story in itself. And it seems that at least some of the American electorate agrees. The TrumpCheck lists have been more widely read, retweeted and shared than anything I’ve ever written, even the stuff I wrote about a crack-smoking mayor. They have put me in the crosshairs of trolls who had been wonderfully unaware of my existence. And they have shown me, again, the limited power of truth to reach people who are sure they already know it.

-snip-
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)
1. Almost any of his lies would have been deadly for other candidate
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:23 AM
Oct 2016

He has been given an endless virtual free pass for ratings purposes.

Can't think of any other explanation.

SamKnause

(13,107 posts)
2. His supporters can not distinguish fact from fiction.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:28 AM
Oct 2016

Therein lies the problem.

They have no interest in facts.

Trump knows this and can manipulate his supporters.

The Republican party has no interest in facts.

Therefore Trump represents the Republican party perfectly.

Martin Eden

(12,869 posts)
3. I'd like to know what historians will say about this election 50 or 100 years from now
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:39 AM
Oct 2016

Living through it now, the rise of Donald Trump and his 40% (approx) support is a national shame and embarrassment as far as I'm concerned.

Cha

(297,270 posts)
4. This is a wonderful service from Daniel Dale of the
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 08:54 AM
Oct 2016

Toronto Star!

Steve Benen kept track of all of mitt's lies in 2012.

Mitt Romney tells 533 lies in 30 weeks, Steve Benen documents them

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2012/08/29/mitt-romney-tells-533-lies-in-30-weeks-steve-benen-documents-them/

That's not chicken scratch.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politico: Confessions of ...