Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:18 PM Oct 2016

Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC *must GO*. Man! She's no longer hiding her dislike for Hillary Clinton.

At the moment doing a passive-aggressive attack on Hillary as she bombards Brian Fallon with the stupidest questions about Benghazi, as if it's a done deal and Hillary has been found guilty of what happened there!

Uh no, Andrea. Listen to what Brian is telling you for once, and put this Benghazi non-scandal to bed already. Sheesh.

Benghazi!
WikiLeaks!
E-mails!
Trust issues!
Health problems!

Andrea is going down the entire Republican attack list like a good shill.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC *must GO*. Man! She's no longer hiding her dislike for Hillary Clinton. (Original Post) BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 OP
When did Mitchell EVER hide her anti-Hillary stance? Paladin Oct 2016 #1
Well, she played coy for the longest time. Now she's blatant about it. I feel she's worse than Joe BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #4
Did she ever hide her dislike for Hillary? and, since she Cha Oct 2016 #2
Hide? Maybe not. But she played 'coy' for a while. BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #5
I think it's personal. They may have been "friendly" at some point and she felt she deserved special Dream Girl Oct 2016 #3
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2016 #7
+2. It sure appears that way. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #16
Stop watching her... Blue Idaho Oct 2016 #6
YEP, and what is really bizarre is she sucks, I mean REALLY sucks Cosmocat Oct 2016 #13
I agree... Andrea Mitchell is awful to listen to TheDebbieDee Oct 2016 #17
You forgot the "tranparency" complaint BSdetect Oct 2016 #8
That's right! That 'transparency accusation' that she propagated in the most negative way, over and BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #10
Andrea is a back stabber. riversedge Oct 2016 #9
A snake in the grass...you don't see her coming...eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #11
Not just that, she can't do her job. Laffy Kat Oct 2016 #12
Yet it's so strange that when she's spewing Republican talkingpoints at Clinton surrogates, her BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #14
I'd get rid of Chuck Todd first. Panich52 Oct 2016 #15
She's a crap reporter from the word go, and saltpoint Oct 2016 #18
She's a dreadful little harpie! So much hate! It's disturbing. NurseJackie Oct 2016 #19
Leave her on and watch her become irrelevant after HRC gets Ilsa Oct 2016 #20
She needs to be retired... HipChick Oct 2016 #21
She's been doing this for months on end Dem2 Oct 2016 #22
I have been tweeting her today... Her hate is so apparent!! AmericanMan1958 Oct 2016 #23

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
4. Well, she played coy for the longest time. Now she's blatant about it. I feel she's worse than Joe
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:24 PM
Oct 2016

Scarborough because he doesn't hide that he's a Republican, so you know what you're getting.

With Andrea, she still gets to be seen as 'non-partisan' but spews Republican talking points as if they're truth when they've all already been debunked. Thoroughly!

Cha

(297,249 posts)
2. Did she ever hide her dislike for Hillary? and, since she
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:22 PM
Oct 2016

doesn't want Hillary she wants a sexual predator in the White House.

Andrea is disgusting.

Hey, BlueCali

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
5. Hide? Maybe not. But she played 'coy' for a while.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:27 PM
Oct 2016

And, of course, she wants that sexual predator in the White House. Andrea is ABC - Anyone But Clinton.

Then she can whine about how bad the country is going and that Democrats are to blame for not convincing Republicans to do the right thing.

The woman should go get a job at Fox.

Hey, Cha!

 

Dream Girl

(5,111 posts)
3. I think it's personal. They may have been "friendly" at some point and she felt she deserved special
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:23 PM
Oct 2016

access, but hasn't gotten what she feels she's entitled to. She still usually gets the first question in Hillary's press avails, but not extensive follow ups. She has it in for Hillary... a few weeks ago when Podesta's emails were leaked, she appeared on some show clutching a print out...she was breathless, almost trembling with excitement, explaining that they hadn't yet been able to review them but she was hoping for some yummy scandalicious stuff. She was so excited. She's really looking for the big scoop.

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
6. Stop watching her...
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:27 PM
Oct 2016

The only way she will lose her job is if her ratings tank. So switch off the TV or switch to CNN. Frankly CNN's coverage is better during her time slot. So if you really want to see her go - switch her off and tell the network what you are doing. If we all do that - your wish will come true.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
13. YEP, and what is really bizarre is she sucks, I mean REALLY sucks
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:45 PM
Oct 2016

She is an on screen "talent" with absolutely no talent for being on a screen.

After DECADES, she remains a very passive and intimidated public speaker, who stutters, mumbles, can't put more than two sentences together before having to hem and haw, and has absolutely no personality, I mean LITERALLY not personality.

WTF they run her out there to begin with is a mystery.

Her ratings have to be in the sub floor of the basement.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
17. I agree... Andrea Mitchell is awful to listen to
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:41 PM
Oct 2016

She stutters and stumbles over her words. Only Dr Nancy Sneiderman could outdo the bumbling, stumbling, mumbling, stuttering, stammering Andrea Mitchell!

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
10. That's right! That 'transparency accusation' that she propagated in the most negative way, over and
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:40 PM
Oct 2016

over and over...

Laffy Kat

(16,381 posts)
12. Not just that, she can't do her job.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:43 PM
Oct 2016

She stutters, loses words, and looks like a deer in the headlights half the time. It's painful to watch.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
14. Yet it's so strange that when she's spewing Republican talkingpoints at Clinton surrogates, her
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 12:46 PM
Oct 2016

bumbling seems to miraculously clear up. It's when she has to do her job as a journalist that she stutters, can't find the words, and looks like a panicked deer in the headlights - and yes, it's painful to watch.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
18. She's a crap reporter from the word go, and
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 01:43 PM
Oct 2016

still is.

I don't know what her issue is with Clinton, but she definitely has one.

That network could do a lot better than Andrea Mitchell.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
19. She's a dreadful little harpie! So much hate! It's disturbing.
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 02:14 PM
Oct 2016

It's time for her to retire ... or just head on over to Fox. (Maybe she'll get a gig at Trump-TV.)

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
20. Leave her on and watch her become irrelevant after HRC gets
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:19 PM
Oct 2016

Her programs moving in a democratic congress.

AmericanMan1958

(520 posts)
23. I have been tweeting her today... Her hate is so apparent!!
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 06:48 PM
Oct 2016

When @mitchellreports looks @HillaryClinton, it is a reminder of a strong/educated woman, Andrea Mitchell will never be. Get a clue, Andrea!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC ...