2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAndrea Mitchell on MSNBC *must GO*. Man! She's no longer hiding her dislike for Hillary Clinton.
At the moment doing a passive-aggressive attack on Hillary as she bombards Brian Fallon with the stupidest questions about Benghazi, as if it's a done deal and Hillary has been found guilty of what happened there!
Uh no, Andrea. Listen to what Brian is telling you for once, and put this Benghazi non-scandal to bed already. Sheesh.
Benghazi!
WikiLeaks!
E-mails!
Trust issues!
Health problems!
Andrea is going down the entire Republican attack list like a good shill.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)Certainly never at any recent time.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Scarborough because he doesn't hide that he's a Republican, so you know what you're getting.
With Andrea, she still gets to be seen as 'non-partisan' but spews Republican talking points as if they're truth when they've all already been debunked. Thoroughly!
Cha
(297,249 posts)doesn't want Hillary she wants a sexual predator in the White House.
Andrea is disgusting.
Hey, BlueCali
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)And, of course, she wants that sexual predator in the White House. Andrea is ABC - Anyone But Clinton.
Then she can whine about how bad the country is going and that Democrats are to blame for not convincing Republicans to do the right thing.
The woman should go get a job at Fox.
Hey, Cha!
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)access, but hasn't gotten what she feels she's entitled to. She still usually gets the first question in Hillary's press avails, but not extensive follow ups. She has it in for Hillary... a few weeks ago when Podesta's emails were leaked, she appeared on some show clutching a print out...she was breathless, almost trembling with excitement, explaining that they hadn't yet been able to review them but she was hoping for some yummy scandalicious stuff. She was so excited. She's really looking for the big scoop.
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)The only way she will lose her job is if her ratings tank. So switch off the TV or switch to CNN. Frankly CNN's coverage is better during her time slot. So if you really want to see her go - switch her off and tell the network what you are doing. If we all do that - your wish will come true.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)She is an on screen "talent" with absolutely no talent for being on a screen.
After DECADES, she remains a very passive and intimidated public speaker, who stutters, mumbles, can't put more than two sentences together before having to hem and haw, and has absolutely no personality, I mean LITERALLY not personality.
WTF they run her out there to begin with is a mystery.
Her ratings have to be in the sub floor of the basement.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)She stutters and stumbles over her words. Only Dr Nancy Sneiderman could outdo the bumbling, stumbling, mumbling, stuttering, stammering Andrea Mitchell!
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)Mitchell is such a drag.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)over and over...
riversedge
(70,236 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,381 posts)She stutters, loses words, and looks like a deer in the headlights half the time. It's painful to watch.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)bumbling seems to miraculously clear up. It's when she has to do her job as a journalist that she stutters, can't find the words, and looks like a panicked deer in the headlights - and yes, it's painful to watch.
Panich52
(5,829 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)still is.
I don't know what her issue is with Clinton, but she definitely has one.
That network could do a lot better than Andrea Mitchell.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's time for her to retire ... or just head on over to Fox. (Maybe she'll get a gig at Trump-TV.)
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Her programs moving in a democratic congress.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Katy Tur needs to take her spot
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Why are you watching her? I never do.
AmericanMan1958
(520 posts)When @mitchellreports looks @HillaryClinton, it is a reminder of a strong/educated woman, Andrea Mitchell will never be. Get a clue, Andrea!