Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumChannelling Trump - The Economist
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21709071-candidates-fan-base-has-what-it-takes-support-new-tv-service-channelling-trump?fsrc=scn/tw/te/pe/ed/channellingtrump"SNIP..........
AS HIS chances of making it to the White House have narrowed in recent weeks, another avenue has opened for Donald Trump. The notion that he might start his own media network has been the subject of speculation for months. Now industry executives are discussing the possibility in some detail.
In September the Republican candidates son-in-law, Jared Kushner, owner of the New York Observer, asked his friend Aryeh Bourkoff, a banker who has been a dealmaker in the media industry, for advice. (A spokeswoman for Mr Bourkoff said he personally had no interest in such a project). Mr Trump himself has denied any intention to start a network. But a look at the numbers suggests that Trump TV could be a success, media folk sayfar from a juggernaut like Fox News, which has revenues of more than $2 billion a year, but lucrative nonetheless.
Such a product would have a good shot at going mainstream because Mr Trump could sell it directly to consumers over the internet, as a subscription streaming service. The Trump brand may now be too toxic for a publicly-owned media company to go into business with him. I would suspect there would be internal protests from women, Muslims and Hispanics and probably many others as well, says Jeff Gaspin, former chairman of NBC Universal Television Entertainment (the company that made Mr Trump a reality-TV star with The Apprentice). An internet-only service would solve that problem. And industry analysts argue that his recent stepping up of attacks on the media and on Hillary Clinton for allegedly rigging the election have stoked the passions of his strong supporterswhich could help turn more into Trump TV subscribers.
The business model could well look like former Fox News personality Glenn Becks subscription streaming network, which shortly after its launch in 2011 claimed 300,000 subscribers, each paying $9.95 a month (though it has since sputtered). Mr Gaspin, who has helped launch similar subscription services in the past, reckons that Mr Trump, with his committed fan base, a social-media following of 24m on Twitter and Facebook, and his talent and energy for self-promotion, could quickly attract 250,000 to 500,000 subscribers. At $100 a year each that would equate to $25m to $50m in revenue, on perhaps $7m to $8m in production costs.
...........SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 770 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Channelling Trump - The Economist (Original Post)
applegrove
Oct 2016
OP
Do they really think they can enough of his fans to pony up subscription fees? The fans are not...
TreasonousBastard
Oct 2016
#3
Laffy Kat
(16,381 posts)1. Fine. At least we'd have the choice to not subscribe.
And I suspect it would do well for a while, until the novelty wears off. His followers will eventually dwindle down to nothing.
applegrove
(118,659 posts)2. Yes. People would get tired of him. It is happening already.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)3. Do they really think they can enough of his fans to pony up subscription fees? The fans are not...
like Beck's, or Howard Stern's-- they are not interested in his words of wisdom but in how he could change the way the country works.
His Apprentice stuff was on a long slide downhill as the concept started wearing thin.
canetoad
(17,160 posts)4. Monetise the deplorables.
Palin tried it, so did Beck. What makes him think his low-information supporters will pay.