Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOnly 15 days left – but it seems like a lifetime
If you havent noticed, I am a bit of political addict; I find the electoral process facilitating, especially when we are electing the person who will occupy the most powerful position in the world. For at least the last year and three months I have watched and read with deep interest as much as possible about the entire Presidential election process.I consider myself a progressive, but not someone on the far left. I guess you could say I am left of center further to the left on social issues, not quite as far from center on monetary issues. I have been a Hillary Clinton supporter from the beginning. I also supported Hillary in 2008 before she dropped out of the race and then I became a huge Barack Obama fan. Given my political views I found none of the prospective Republican nominees remotely appealing, though some were less distasteful than others.
When I learned that a little known independent Senator from Maine named Bernie Sanders, an ultra progressive, was challenging Clinton for the nomination, I wasnt worried. However, Bernie gave a much better account for himself than I ever thought possible. Once he realized he could win I think at first that he entered the race primarily to pull Hillary to the left his attacks exposed weaknesses in Clintons persona that I thought might be exploited by the right Republican candidate in the general election. I was surprised by the size of Bernies support and very surprised by the enthusiasm of his supporters, though I probably should not have been. I have always known that the further to the left or to the right people are, the more intense they are about their politics. I was also exposed to another political truth; victory goes not to the candidate with the most enthusiastic supporters, but to the candidate with the most supporters, provided they are willing to go out and vote.
On the Republican side it was more difficult for me to pick a favorite. On one hand, given the possibility that the Republican nominee might win the general election, I would normally have preferred that it would have been someone more centralist, more reasonable. On the other hand I believed that the more centralist and reasonable the Republicans nominee, the better his chances of beating Hillary. Ultimately I decided that it would be better if Republican voters blew up their primary and nominated the most irrational, most far out candidate. So ultimately Cruz and Trump became my favorites. Grass roots Republicans, in full rebellion, lived up to my low expectations and whittled down the field to Cruz and Trump. Out of the two I preferred Trump, the less disciplined candidate who I believed, and still believe, would be the easier of the two to beat. However, given the chaos and embarrassment that Trump has visited on this country since the Republican Convention, had I known then what I know now, I think I would have preferred Cruz.
However, throughout the primaries and into the general election season I was a happy camper. After the Republican National Convention reminded me a journey through a dank and dreary cave, the Democratic National Convention hit a high note Then Trump took the bait dangled in front of him like a bass devouring a big, juicy shad and starting attacking the Kahns, a Gold Star family. Reprehensible as that was, it pealed away the layers and revealed to American voters the real Donald Trump, and that is not a pretty site.
Then until the first debate it became a monotonous litany of Trumps attacks, lies (lots of lies), rants, whining, and numerous reminders from The Donald about of how great he is. If ever there has been a man with a clearer case of egotistical, narcissistic disorder it had to be someone we have never heard of who wasted away in an insane asylum. Yet he managed to not only hold onto his most deplorable supporters, he picked up enough support from normally sane Republicans to largely close the gap in the polls which had developed after the conventions.
Click here to read the last few paragraphs:
Only 15 days left but it seems like a life time
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 467 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Only 15 days left – but it seems like a lifetime (Original Post)
CajunBlazer
Oct 2016
OP
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)1. Overdone = two weeks to go.
LeftInTX
(25,595 posts)2. I pretty much agree
I voted for Bernie in the primary, but I also felt Clinton's experience was an asset.
I agree about the Cruz/Trump premise. I thought Cruz would be easier to beat. Since Trump was in the public for so many years, the public felt they "knew him" or "like him". I thought at the very least his entertainment/showmanship persona would be an asset. (The creep doesn't even have a sense of humor. I've never watched the Apprentice, but assumed that in order to star in a show you have to get along with people or be entertaining or something)
I thought maybe his business wheeling/dealings would show he was capable of compromise.
Naa, he turned out to be a nasty, vindictive, nobody. His only asset is he has made a bunch of money.