Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grossproffit

(5,591 posts)
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 03:57 PM Oct 2016

Flashback in History. Michigan Governor race Blanchard vs. Engler. Don't assume. VOTE!

Flashback 1990 Michigan.

Gov. Blanchard was set to be reelected Governor of Michigan and was ahead in every poll, and by large numbers. People, like my aunt, who still feels guilty to this day, stayed home. Her friends stayed home, too. Many, many people stayed home. It was a gimme, right? Blanchard was going to win reelection and win big.

Blanchard lost by 17,000 votes.

Never assume. Vote.








8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kevink077

(365 posts)
1. A little different scenario
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 04:08 PM
Oct 2016

This was not during a presidential year. Englar ran an outstanding clever campaign. Blanchard was lackluster. .plus Engler ran as a moderate. You are correct you can never assume as Blanchard did. Clintons campaign is not assuming.

grossproffit

(5,591 posts)
7. This is about voters assuming, not candidates. Many didn't vote because they thought he'd win by
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 04:43 PM
Oct 2016

a large amount. Problem is that others assumed the same thing and they didn't show up to vote either.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
4. I think most people on DU will vote if they are of age.
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 04:18 PM
Oct 2016

But yes, it is best to vote and vote early and then help others on election day (if you can) get to the polls.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
5. Flashback to history that is both more recent and Presidential election-related
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 04:21 PM
Oct 2016

MN had the highest turnout in the nation in 2012 with polls consistently showing a safe Obama lead outside the MOE. His actual margin of victory was almost 50% greater than the final RCP average.

The two "states" with the greatest INcrease in turnout from the far more interesting 2008 elections were both 40%+ margin of victory dark-colored mortal locks for opposite parties, Utah and DC.

The states where Obama outperformed his final polls by the greatest number of points in 2012 were all easy precalls with unassailable margins, one where he was a certain winner (HI) and two where he had zero chance (AK and MS).

There is an almost complete absence of correlation between turnout and margin of victory for Democratic states (-0.04) and yet a sort of possible negative correlation for Republican States (-0.34). In other words if there is a party which has to worry about complacency depressing turnout, it ain't ours.





Tanuki

(14,922 posts)
8. And just this year, HRC was expected to win the Michigan primary, but lost to Sanders. Never, ever
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 05:22 PM
Oct 2016

take anything for granted until every vote has been cast and counted! Michelle Obama has reminded people in each of her speeches that only a few votes can make all the difference in a precinct, and the results of the entire election can turn on a small number of individual precincts. Vote, and GOTV in every way you can! All hands on deck, every shoulder to the wheel. One need only consider the alternative:


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Flashback in History. Mic...